People who work from home could soon have a six-month reprieve from being forced back to the office. (Source: Getty) <\/p>\n
A union is pushing for workers to be given a six-month notice period before being forced back to the office<\/a>. The Fair Work Commission (FWC) is currently investigating whether changes need to be made<\/a> to the Clerks Award, a test case that could spark similar adjustments to other work contracts across the country.<\/p>\n The Australian Services Union (ASU) believes staff deserve to have the right to work from home<\/a> (WFH), but if circumstances change, they need to have enough time to get their affairs in order. ASU national secretary Emeline Gaske said this clause would be essential to workers who might have certain commitments<\/a>.<\/p>\n \u201cA fair notice period is a critical protection that recognises the reality of people\u2019s lives. For many people, particularly women, working from home is deeply integrated into how they manage their family and caring responsibilities.<\/p>\n \u201cSuddenly removing that arrangement isn\u2019t a simple change \u2013 it pulls a thread that can unravel a family\u2019s entire routine.<\/p>\n “It means finding new after-school care where there are often long waiting lists, rearranging transport, or finding alternative support for an elderly parent.\u201d<\/p>\n Big-name companies like Amazon<\/a>, Woolworths<\/a>, and Coles<\/a> have told staff they have to return to the office after several years of WFH privileges.<\/p>\n Do you have a story? Email stew.perrie@yahooinc.com<\/p>\n Some only have to come in a few days, while others now have to come back from Monday to Friday, as it was before the pandemic.<\/p>\n Some offices have adopted a staggered approach to give workers time to adjust, while others have only been given a few weeks to go from full WFH to being in the office full-time<\/a>.<\/p>\n Gaske wants to prevent that latter circumstance from happening to people on the Clerks Award, as the union believes employers shouldn’t be able to ‘pull the rug out from under their employees’.<\/p>\n The ASU has submitted its proposal to the FWC over how WFH rights should operate for the roughly 1.8 million workers on the Clerks Award.<\/p>\n At the moment, these workers have the right to make a WFH request<\/a> and explain why they should be allowed to do it.<\/p>\n But this is only available to workers who have been with their employer for at least 12 months and are pregnant, a parent, someone with a disability, over the age of 55, a carer, or someone experiencing domestic violence.<\/p>\n Story Continues <\/p>\n The ASU wants there to be a built-in presumption that when a staff member applies to work remotely, it will be approved.<\/p>\n The employer and employee would have to try to reach an agreement to accommodate the staff member’s request, and if that can’t be done, then the worker would need at least 26 weeks’ notice before returning to the office.<\/p>\n This would also apply to employers seeking to vary or pause a worker’s current WFH setup.<\/p>\n An ASU survey recently found a whopping 98 per cent of respondents felt WFH rights were important or extremely important to them.<\/p>\n A separate poll of nearly 8,500 Yahoo Finance readers discovered 59 per cent would leave their job if they couldn’t work from home.<\/p>\n New research from Roy Morgan also found 46 per cent of employed Australians work from home<\/a> at least some of the time, with that figure rising to 51 per cent for full-time workers<\/a>.<\/p>\n The union said this should serve as a wake-up call for bosses that things have changed massively since 2019.<\/p>\n \u201cWorking from home is now a permanent feature of the modern Australian workplace, and our submission will make it clear that the location of work does not diminish its value,\u201d Gaske said.<\/p>\n The ASU’s submission comes after other groups have proposed to the FWC<\/a> that WFH rights could continue to operate, but workers might have to give up certain work perks like penalty rates<\/a>, minimum hour requirements, overtime pay<\/a>, and rest breaks.<\/p>\n The Clerks Award covers roles such as administrative assistants, receptionists, and bookkeepers.<\/p>\n HR expert Lara Nercessian told Yahoo Finance<\/a>\u00a0a lot is riding on the FWC investigation, as it could start a domino effect with other work contracts.<\/p>\n “A lot of businesses and organisations are going to be quite apprehensive in terms of the way that this unfolds,” she said.<\/p>\n “After their significant efforts and attempts to get people back into the office full-time, I think a lot of organisations may see it as undoing the work that they’ve done.”<\/p>\n But this also comes at a time when moves are being made to protect WFH rights for all workers in two Aussie states.<\/p>\n The Victorian government wants to enshrine a legal right<\/a> for employees to WFH at least two days a week.<\/p>\n It’s the first attempt at a state-wide mandate for public and private sector workers who could reasonably do their work from home.<\/p>\n The South Australian Greens are also preparing a bill<\/a> that could grant public sector workers the right to work from home at least one day a week.<\/p>\n But state Premier, Peter Malinauskas, has already indicated the proposal won’t go very far.<\/p>\n \u201cTo mandate things, I think, runs the risk of having unintended consequences,\u201d he said.<\/p>\n \u201cAnd occasionally I think employers should have the ability to say, \u2018Look, we\u2019re paying you to do a particular task and this is where I need you to perform those tasks.'”<\/p>\n Get the latest Yahoo Finance news – follow us on Facebook<\/a>, LinkedIn<\/a> and Instagram<\/a>.<\/p>\n ASU national secretary Emeline Gaske said workers need to be given enough time to adjust to return-to-office mandates. (Source: AAP) <\/p>\n