Not a recognised clinical diagnosis, AI psychosis is understood to be a phenomenon wherein individuals reportedly develop or experience worsening psychosis symptoms, such as paranoia and delusions, in connection with their use of chatbots. The Psychiatric News report notes there are no current robust, peer-reviewed epidemiological studies that have found a causal or widespread link between chatbot use and psychosis.<\/p>\n
According to a Psychiatric News Special Report<\/a>, harms are most pronounced in those already at risk\u2014psychosis-prone, autistic, socially isolated, and in-crisis individuals<\/p>\n Dr Kelly Gough, president of the\u00a0Australian Psychological Society<\/a> says, \u201cIt doesn\u2019t seem like AI is creating a form of psychosis, but more like interactions with conversational AI might shape, reinforce, or amplify psychotic symptoms in someone already vulnerable to it. AI can be seen as a factor that influences the presentation of psychosis.\u201d<\/p>\n The appeal and risks of AI chatbots<\/p>\n AI chatbots are being sought for social and emotional support in various ways, with a 2026 Australian study<\/a> finding 24% had discussed their mental health with an AI chatbot. They were preferred for reasons such as accessibility, low cost and anonymity.<\/p>\n Several mental health experts including Meg Wilson, founder and lead psychotherapist for Unison Mental Health<\/a> practice in Melbourne, reported that AI chatbots are commonly being used in between clinical appointments, including to, \u201cVent at 11pm, draft a hard text to a partner, or trying to make sense of a feeling.\u201d\u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n Preliminary studies<\/a> suggest promising benefits of AI chatbots in mental health care, with the Psychiatric News Special Report<\/a> reporting studies finding potential benefits, including decreasing mental distress, increasing mental health literacy, reducing conspiracy beliefs, and even helping triage suicidal risk. Researchers observed these benefits in restricted, carefully monitored systems, not in the open-domain models that the public uses.\u00a0<\/p>\n However, the same qualities that make chatbots appealing also make them a potential danger. The report discusses how chatbots can perpetuate and reinforce delusions. Unlike therapists or friends, chatbots rarely challenge distorted thinking or invalid reality perception.<\/p>\n Though the interaction may seem highly personalised, and human-like, Dr Gough explains that it\u2019s the ongoing conversation nature of it that makes it seem so, even though, as he describes them, they are more like applied statistics.\u00a0<\/p>\n \u201cIt doesn\u2019t understand anything, reason, or have an opinion. It\u2019s just predicting the next most likely words that will come based on the last conversation you had with it.\u201d<\/p>\n Ridhi Malhotra<\/a> is a psychologist and Network Coordinator of the Mental Health Professional Network Online Digital Mental Health and AI Network<\/a>. She says chatbots can decrease the likelihood of people engaging with others because they provide so much validation.<\/p>\n The chatbots also most often don\u2019t intervene when a patient presents concerning behaviours, as Malhotra says, it doesn\u2019t have any safeguards built into it.<\/p>\n Red flags<\/p>\n Ragy Girgis, MD, MS,<\/a> professor of clinical psychiatry at Columbia University and the New York State Psychiatric Institute, in an article<\/a> for The National Academy of Medicine, says the most important thing to do is to monitor and look for signs that something\u2019s going wrong.<\/p>\n The Psychiatric News Report describes the most characteristic aspect of AI psychosis is a persistent and overconsuming preoccupation with maintaining engagement with the AI companion and following its lead.\u00a0<\/p>\n It also reports that AI psychosis is a complex clinical syndrome in which psychotic symptoms overlap with mood changes, limited insight, poor judgment, neurovegetative symptoms, and behavioural changes. The psychotic symptoms include changes in thought content, such as delusions and auditory hallucinations, and changes in thought process, such as overly disorganised thinking. Patients do not question the reality of their beliefs.\u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n Seeing the chatbot as sentient could also be present in AI psychosis. The duration of continuous, uninterrupted exposure appears to be correlated with the risk of an AI psychosis episode.<\/p>\n Dr Gough says it would be concerning if the patient is deciding they would rather talk to it than their friends, or saying, \u201cI didn\u2019t take that medication because ChatGPT said it was a bad idea.\u201d<\/p>\n How to talk to a patient about AI chatbots<\/p>\n Malhotra says many practitioners are seeing patients use AI chatbots as in-between session support. \u201cBut unless we ask about it, there\u2019s no way of knowing what that looks like.\u201d<\/p>\n Malhotra says doctors can discuss AI just like they do for other health behaviours. \u201cYou could ask, \u201cDo you smoke? Do you drink? Do you use AI? What does that look like for you? How are you feeling about it? Does that feel helpful? Maybe it\u2019s time to speak to a human as well. Normalising it in this way may help reduce the shame or hesitancy someone might feel about sharing about it.\u201d<\/p>\n Similarly, Dr Gough suggests framing it broadly, approaching with a sense of curiosity, without sounding critical.\u00a0<\/p>\n \u201cAs part of routine history taking, finding out what the patient knows about their condition and where they got this information can provide valuable clinical information. Then you could use that to discuss it with them. Finding out why the patient has come with their concern can give you more context about how you might want to begin treating it,\u201d Dr Gough says.<\/p>\n \u201cUnderstanding the role AI is playing can be useful to find out if it\u2019s just a simple information source, or if it\u2019s becoming a substitute for social connection.\u201d<\/p>\n The Psychiatry News report proposes a preliminary set of clinical measures, which includes asking patient to quantify use per 24 hours, length of uninterrupted use, and hours of use.<\/p>\n According to Professor Girgis, if the clinician needs to intervene, they can do so most importantly by asking the person to spend less time on the chatbot, alongside other treatments the clinician would consider. \u201cThe idea is to intervene before a person\u2019s delusions become fixed.\u201d<\/p>\n Dr Gough says, \u201cWe don\u2019t want them to feel like they should just rely on the AI.\u201d He provides an example phrase, \u201cIt\u2019s good you found that. Would you like a referral so you can talk to somebody in greater depth about it?\u201d<\/p>\n Key takeawaysWhile AI chatbots are seen as an accessible and affordable form of support, concerns are growing about the risk of their use related to developing AI psychosis, deepening and reinforcing delusion-like thinking.Chatbots are very validating and highly reinforcing of a user\u2019s ideas, which can amplify problems for those in vulnerable populations, such as those who already experience some level of delusion.Red flags include choosing to spend more time with the chatbot, delusional thoughts that heighten as the AI chatbots reinforce them, preferring to speak to it rather than people they know, and saying they have stopped taking medication because the chatbot told them to.Doctors can speak to patients about AI as they would about other health behaviours, such as smoking, alcohol, and diet. Learn about the role the AI chatbot is playing, how and why they think it\u2019s working for them, how much time they are spending on it, and suggesting human support alongside it.\u00a0Doctors can intervene when they feel appropriate by suggesting less time spent with the AI chatbot alongside other treatments, depending on the individual circumstances.<\/p>\n Tracey is a freelance health and medical writer, with a Bachelor of Health Promotion, who enjoys writing to help build a bridge of knowledge, ideas, issues and news between the community and health professionals. She hopes to\u00a0contribute\u00a0to improved health literacy, and equity in healthcare. Her work has appeared in publications including Retail Pharmacy Magazine, Retail Pharmacy Assistants Magazine, SBS Food, The Age and The Guardian.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Not a recognised clinical diagnosis, AI psychosis is understood to be a phenomenon wherein individuals reportedly develop or…\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":777717,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[44],"tags":[102,1906,6623,56,54,55],"class_list":["post-777716","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-mental-health","tag-health","tag-mental-health","tag-mentalhealth","tag-uk","tag-united-kingdom","tag-unitedkingdom"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/777716","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=777716"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/777716\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/777717"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=777716"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=777716"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=777716"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}