{"id":791260,"date":"2026-10-04T02:10:43","date_gmt":"2026-10-04T02:10:43","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/uk\/791260\/"},"modified":"2026-10-04T02:10:43","modified_gmt":"2026-10-04T02:10:43","slug":"sara-bejlek-vs-maddison-inglis-prediction-odds-picks-for-wta-china-open-2026","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/uk\/791260\/","title":{"rendered":"Sara Bejlek vs. Maddison Inglis prediction, odds, picks for WTA China Open 2026"},"content":{"rendered":"<p> Using powerful machine learning and statistical analysis, we have re-simulated the result of Friday&#8217;s Bejlek-Inglis women&#8217;s singles match, forming part of our <a href=\"https:\/\/www.dimers.com\/tennis\/predictions\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">tennis predictions<\/a> coverage.<\/p>\n<p>Our independent predictive model currently gives Bejlek a 73% chance of beating Inglis at the WTA China Open tournament.<br \/>\nAdditionally, Bejlek has a 69% chance of winning the first set. The simulations also show that the oddsmakers have got it right with the +4.5 games spread, with each player projected to have a 50-50 chance of covering, while the over 20.5 games has a 52% chance of hitting, according to our model.<\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>Latest betting odds<\/p>\n<p>We have researched the most up-to-date betting odds in America for this match, which are listed here:<\/p>\n<p>Moneyline: Maddison Inglis +263, Sara Bejlek -303<br \/>\nFirst Set: Bejlek -250, Inglis +200<\/p>\n<p>All odds are correct at the time of publication and are subject to change.<\/p>\n<p>Model picks and best bet<\/p>\n<p>After matching our predictions against the best current odds, we can reveal our picks for each of the major markets in this matchup. Plus, find our best bet for the game below:<\/p>\n<p>Moneyline: Inglis @ +263 via DraftKings<br \/>\nFirst Set: Inglis @ -110 via DraftKings<\/p>\n<p>According to our <a href=\"https:\/\/www.dimers.com\/tennis\/best-bets\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">best tennis bets<\/a>, the top play to make on this match is Maddison Inglis to win the first set.<\/p>\n<p>These picks are based on our probabilities matched against the implied probabilities from the current available odds.<\/p>\n<p>Game info &amp; first serve details<\/p>\n<p>The WTA China Open match between Sara Bejlek and Maddison Inglis is scheduled to commence on Friday at 2:40 AM ET.<\/p>\n<p>Who: Sara Bejlek vs. Maddison Inglis<br \/>\nDate: Friday, October 2, 2026<br \/>\nApprox. Time: 2:40 AM ET\/11:40PM PT<br \/>\nTournament: WTA Beijing, China Women&#8217;s Singles 2026<br \/>\nRound: Round of 64<\/p>\n<p>All dates and times in this article are United States Eastern Time unless otherwise noted.<\/p>\n<p>Conclusion<\/p>\n<p>We predict Sara Bejlek, with a 73% win probability, will likely beat Maddison Inglis at the WTA China Open tournament.<\/p>\n<p>Additional tools and information for betting safely can be found in our <a href=\"https:\/\/www.dimers.com\/responsible-gambling\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Responsible Gambling<\/a> hub.<\/p>\n<p>This article&#8217;s predictions and probabilities are generated by Dimers&#8217; proprietary Tennis prediction model. Our editorial team reviews the resulting content for accuracy and presentation before publication.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Using powerful machine learning and statistical analysis, we have re-simulated the result of Friday&#8217;s Bejlek-Inglis women&#8217;s singles match,&hellip;\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":791261,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[38],"tags":[101,118,56,54,55],"class_list":["post-791260","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-tennis","tag-sports","tag-tennis","tag-uk","tag-united-kingdom","tag-unitedkingdom"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/791260","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=791260"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/791260\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/791261"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=791260"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=791260"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=791260"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}