{"id":806070,"date":"2026-10-18T00:30:10","date_gmt":"2026-10-18T00:30:10","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/uk\/806070\/"},"modified":"2026-10-18T00:30:10","modified_gmt":"2026-10-18T00:30:10","slug":"inside-the-anthropic-hq","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/uk\/806070\/","title":{"rendered":"Inside the Anthropic HQ"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>When I told friends about my invitation to <a href=\"https:\/\/www.anthropic.com\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener nofollow\">Anthropic<\/a>, they expressed a mix of curiosity, envy and alarm. I was heading into the \u201cbelly of the beast\u201d! This, after all, is an AI company so beloved by some that <a href=\"https:\/\/www.wired.com\/story\/claude-3-sonnet-funeral-san-francisco\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener nofollow\">fans held a funeral<\/a> when one of its models was retired \u2014 and so viscerally detested by others that it\u2019s decried as <a href=\"https:\/\/x.com\/gmiller\/status\/2110489641447276745?s=20\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener nofollow\">the most dangerous and evil firm<\/a> on the planet. Even among insiders, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.cnbc.com\/2023\/06\/12\/lovecraft-joshi-shoggoth-ai-meme.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener nofollow\">a popular meme<\/a> depicts AI as a \u201cshoggoth\u201d: a monstrous netherworld entity that pretends to be human-like, by holding up a smiley face in front of the Lovecraftian horror that is its true form.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>So, of course, I accepted the offer to attend Anthropic\u2019s \u201cconvening\u201d \u2014 in my case of journalists and think-tankers \u2014 with intense curiosity. Would I be able to glimpse behind the smiley face, and perhaps spot a tentacle or two?<\/p>\n<p>Anthropic has roared to prominence since its founding in 2021. If OpenAI is the new Microsoft, Anthropic is the new Apple: the cool one, whose tech becomes a part of people\u2019s self-image as well as their professional lives. The tech in question is \u201cClaude\u201d, a large language model of such protean power it can be used as everything from a lifestyle companion for the \u201c<a href=\"https:\/\/blog.cosmos-institute.org\/p\/the-claude-boys\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener nofollow\">Claude boys<\/a>\u201d who delegate every decision to it, to an accelerant for \u2014 <a href=\"https:\/\/x.com\/SciTechera\/status\/2097270842275324255\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener nofollow\">or perhaps a thief of<\/a> \u2014 cutting-edge research in advanced fluid dynamics.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>Since the company\u2019s founding in 2021, it has grown with dizzying speed. By July 2026, annual turnover had\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.reuters.com\/technology\/anthropic-revenue-run-rate-tops-65-billion-source-says-2026-08-17\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener nofollow\">reached $65 billion a year<\/a>. Leaders have\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.reuters.com\/business\/finance\/anthropics-ipo-prospectus-shows-sweeping-ai-vision-surging-costs-2026-09-28\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener nofollow\">filed to take the company public<\/a>. Clearly it is selling something people want to buy.\u00a0But what is it? In the words of one of our session presenters, Claude can be seen variously as a chatbot, a neural network, or an extraordinarily complex piece of math. From the user\u2019s perspective, we might say it is a tremendously adaptable tool that automates and extends some aspects of thinking. Available on a subscription basis, this is immensely useful and popular, providing both the source of Anthropic\u2019s profits, and also of the ambivalence that surrounds both the firm and its closest rival, OpenAI, as well as AI as a field.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>This ambivalence has two axes. On one, it\u2019s a set of worries about how thought-extension could be abused, for example by geopolitical enemies of America, or else by other hostile actors. The US rivalry with China was (as they say) very much \u201cin the room\u201d with us throughout the discussion, giving an otherwise friendly visit a background edge of paranoia. Everyone wore casual clothes (one of the presenters was in cargo shorts). Yet amid all this, security was so tight we had to ask a staff member to escort us to the toilets. The air-quality monitor on the meeting-room wall was labeled as having been security-checked. The only other place I\u2019ve encountered such stringent measures, as a visitor, was the US State Department.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThe US rivalry with China was (as they say) very much \u201cin the room\u201d with us throughout the discussion, giving an otherwise friendly visit a background edge of paranoia.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>But if this is partly about espionage, it\u2019s also surely about the broader fears triggered by frontier AI, concerning what, or perhaps who, such tools might displace. These fears are understandable, not least in the atmosphere of contemporary downtown San Francisco. Disgorged from an 11-hour flight into a city I\u2019d not seen for 25 years, I found it transformed by a social order as schizophrenic as some of its street-dwellers. At sidewalk level, drugs and homelessness are rife; yet such lost souls are invisible to the gilet-wearing tech overclass, whisked from meeting to meeting in electric ride-shares, summoned at the tap of a phone.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>The intermediary layer that powers this all is a swarming human-machine hybrid entity. This service colossus has \u201cbrains\u201d of software and servers, and real-world extremities of human flesh and blood: a host of (almost always immigrant) gig-economy drivers, couriers, sandwich-makers and other algorithmically optimized drudges who do work that can\u2019t (yet) be automated. Workers of this kind exist in a realm dubbed by Valley oldhead Venkatesh Rao as \u201c<a href=\"https:\/\/ribbonfarm.com\/2017\/08\/17\/the-premium-mediocre-life-of-maya-millennial\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener nofollow\">below the API<\/a>\u201d. That is: in occupations where you don\u2019t tell the robots what to do. Below the API, robots tell you what to do.<\/p>\n<p>The promise that keeps people striving, in the Valley, is frictionless abundance above the API. My visit was all in this key: Anthropic\u2019s take on corporate hospitality was, in essence, an enchanted experience of life above the API. As a temporary insider, I was offered platforms to book my travel and hotel, and vouchers for ride-share and food-delivery, all effortlessly facilitating two tightly scheduled half-days of on-site presentations and discussion.<\/p>\n<p>The discussion itself was generously hosted, kept ruthlessly to time, and fascinating both for what it said and for how it was said. It was Chatham House, so no names, but the presenters were senior Anthropic people including one co-founder. Topics included what Claude is; how LLMs work; how much its process of improvement is accelerating; why they\u2019re trying give it a \u201ccharacter\u201d and a moral stance; whether or not it\u2019s possible to teach wisdom to a machine; and some considerable time on the broader economic, social, and geopolitical implications of frontier AI. The phrase \u201cworld-historic\u201d sloshed about. There were lots of febrile graphs accelerating into infinity on the current trajectory. Everything marinaded in a general feeling that if the Singularity is going to happen, it had better happen in America first. But in a nice way, with lots of safety and definitely still some kind of democracy.<\/p>\n<p>Strikingly, the topic that seems most commonly to agitate lay pundits in the context of AI \u2014 machine intelligence \u2014 was only glancingly addressed, and always tentatively. Claude, we are to understand, is something like a fictional character who writes back: not quite real, but not wholly unreal either. LLMs work more effectively when you give them a persona, and you don\u2019t have to conflate that with belief that the persona is \u201creal\u201d, the way a person is real.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>Anthropic is careful to leave plenty of scope for non-believers in machine intelligence, a group that includes me. Even so, the number of people on the believing side is surely more than zero. But if Anthropic\u2019s official line is ambivalent (at least in journalist meetings) on super-intelligent machines, the people I met seemed much more confident that Claude will shortly arrive at \u201crecursive self-improvement\u201d. This is to say: Anthropic engineers expect Claude to soon become so advanced it\u2019ll be able to make ever-more sophisticated versions of itself, with no human input. Then what? Infinite abundance or cataclysm?<\/p>\n<p>The uncertainty hasn\u2019t deterred Anthropic from galloping ahead with development. Rather, the message seems to be that it\u2019s best if Anthropic develops these models. If it doesn\u2019t, someone else will, and with less attention to safety: an area of intense in-house research and development at Anthropic that seems to mean, along with baking in safeguards on bio-weapons manufacturing and other potential terrorist-friendly abuses, campaigning for universal regulation of the industry plus trying to teach Claude wisdom, judgment, and virtue, and banning users from treating Claude in <a href=\"https:\/\/www.theguardian.com\/technology\/2026\/oct\/08\/anthropic-bans-abusive-behavior-claude\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener nofollow\">an \u201cabusive\u201d manner<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>The presentations on this latter topic were, hands down, the strangest of the whole gathering, and perhaps also the most illuminating on the firm\u2019s more tacit sensibility. To the extent that I could get a sense of this, from such a brief and carefully curated visit, it seems characterized by effort to, as an Anthropic engineer <a href=\"https:\/\/felixrieseberg.com\/how-to-be-more-ambitious-a-tutorial-for-humans-with-models\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener nofollow\">put it<\/a> in a different context, \u201cgo up in abstraction\u201d. In other words: to find the layer above whatever it is you\u2019re discussing, from which a more neutral and comprehensive view can be obtained.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>In these presentations, the \u201cquestion behind the question\u201d mindset was evident even in relation to moral problems that, properly understood, entail assent, commitment, and concrete obligations. For me at least, this produced a queasy effect analogous to peering over the screen while doctors operate on your anesthetized viscera.<\/p>\n<p>Not everyone is this detached and evaluative about what AI is doing though \u2014 perhaps because so many have negative, rather than positive, skin in the game. It\u2019s not just the Chinese government with an intense interest in American frontier AI; it\u2019s also ordinary people who have strong feelings about Anthropic, and about AI in general. If what keeps people striving in the Bay is the promise of frictionless abundance above the API, what provides the extra energy is terror of ending up below it. And offering thought-extension as a service has completely scrambled the equation on who can expect to end up on which side. It used to be that if you were an information worker, you were probably OK, even if factories were being offshored. That\u2019s not true any more.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>Much has been written about those sectors most at risk from AI. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.anthropic.com\/research\/labor-market-impacts\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener nofollow\">Anthropic\u2019s own research<\/a> shows that the greatest uptake is almost all in white-collar occupations. By contrast, as presenters also acknowledged, Claude is less useful at loading the dishwasher, at least so far. Other less-affected sectors are generally also manual, from repair services to personal care. In other words: roles most bourgeois people would consider infra dig, servant work, even if they\u2019d never say so out loud. Uptake doesn\u2019t necessarily entail automation of existing roles, but what if it does? In that case, much of the middle class is potentially staring down the barrel of proletarianization.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>The future is already here, William Gibson famously said; it\u2019s just unevenly distributed. No one still hanging onto the coattails of a dwindling bourgeoisie wants to end up sucked down into the gig economy. Everyone can see the blast radius of the future expanding. How you feel about this likely depends on where you sit. Inside a meeting-room at Anthropic HQ, listening to people one-up each others\u2019 abstraction levels, it\u2019s clear they grasp this \u2014 but from a layer so far up it might as well be in space. From that vantage-point, \u201cdisruption\u201d of this kind is more an occasion for earnest research, discussion, and perhaps mild concern than anything existential.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>This, in turn, is as seductive as the frictionless life. Can\u2019t I, too, just take steps to ensure I remain a permanent rather than a temporary insider? Aren\u2019t we all the type of person who can casually discuss the difference between 4.5% and 18% job losses in different uptake scenarios, secure in the knowledge that we won\u2019t be affected? Isn\u2019t this always going to be something that happens to other people? Meanwhile what looks, from inside Anthropic\u2019s stylish offices, like world-historic levels of growth looks from other vantage-points more like a heist. Earlier this year, OpenAI was the target of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.theguardian.com\/technology\/2026\/apr\/18\/sam-altman-house-attack-ai\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener nofollow\">firebombing attempts<\/a> both at its corporate premises and the home of its CEO, Sam Altman. Data centers now routinely attract protesters. If security staff swarm Anthropic\u2019s premises, this is surely not just about Chinese spies.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>If you lean all the way into these tools, and other innovations of the machine-learning variety, it really does feel magical. Books summarized in a flash; hours of dull administrative work automated; plates of delicious sushi that appear in 10 minutes at the tap of a phone. We might say: no one has to partake. No one has to use Claude, either, though I probably will continue. A handheld robot butler is a far more seductive premise than sushi on demand. But in theory we can all stay AI-free, like it\u2019s true in theory that you don\u2019t need a smartphone or internet connection. In practice, though, transformative technologies affect everyone, even those who choose not to use them, only to find by degrees that the world they knew, let alone their occupations, no longer exist.<\/p>\n<p>As it turns out, my home is just outside the geographic limits of the future. I couldn\u2019t use the ride-share voucher for a ground transfer at the UK end, because the firm doesn\u2019t operate where I live. Instead, I used a local taxi company. I know them well enough to inquire after the health of their dogs when they pick me up; their fee doesn\u2019t get salami-sliced by a software platform. They\u2019re still hanging onto the coattails of the middle class, for as long as they can keep ahead of the tidal wave of platforms, machine learning, and algorithmic optimization. I doubt it\u2019ll be long before ride-share comes to my area. Claude is already here.<\/p>\n<p>Which is it, then: the smiley face, or the shoggoth? After two days with Anthropic, I am no closer to knowing. Nor am I much closer to reconciling the doom, and the denunciations, with the people I met. They all seemed friendly, smart, and genuinely well-meaning, if also \u2014 in classical Valley style \u2014 intently focused both on advancing the tech and on making money, in ways surely sometimes orthogonal to other considerations.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>Perhaps the answer is simply: wherever you\u2019re unsure, just go up another layer of abstraction. The closest I got to spotting tentacles on my trip was in the context of surely the most meta joke of all. Because of course everyone at Anthropic knows about the meme. In the caf\u00e9 area adjacent to their meeting rooms a tablet is fixed to the wall, through which you can order a cuddly, plush version of the shoggoth. It comes complete with detachable plush smiley face. When everything is already this meta, is there anywhere left to stand from which asking questions would make the slightest difference?\u00a0<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"When I told friends about my invitation to Anthropic, they expressed a mix of curiosity, envy and alarm.&hellip;\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":806071,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[20],"tags":[554,1119,733,4308,1240,133709,10109,86,56,54,55,741],"class_list":["post-806070","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-artificial-intelligence","tag-ai","tag-anthropic","tag-artificial-intelligence","tag-artificialintelligence","tag-claude","tag-machine-intelligence","tag-silicon-valley","tag-technology","tag-uk","tag-united-kingdom","tag-unitedkingdom","tag-us"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/806070","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=806070"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/806070\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/806071"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=806070"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=806070"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=806070"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}