MoD says under new offset policy foreign firms will only get big defence contracts if they spend equivalent amount in UK<\/p>\n
Wes Streeting, the defence secretary, was on the interview round this morning, announcing a new aspect of defence procurement policy. The Ministry of Defence is now saying that, if overseas suppliers win UK defence contracts, they will be required to spend the equivalent amount in the UK.<\/p>\n
Explaining the policy, the MoD says<\/a>:<\/p>\n double quotation markBritish workers, businesses and apprentices will benefit from major changes which will see more defence work carried out in the UK thanks to the launch of a world-leading Offsets policy.<\/p>\n Under the new rules, overseas companies that win significant UK defence contracts will be required to invest back into Britain, through new British jobs and apprenticeships, opening UK factories, investing in domestic suppliers, transferring technology and innovation know-how.<\/p>\n This means contracts worth over \u00a350m will be considered for offsets. The contractors will be required to deliver such benefits to the UK that could reach the same value as the contract, for example a \u00a3100m contract could see new jobs, facilities, or skills training up to the same \u00a3100m value in the UK.<\/p>\n The government is prioritising buying British defence contracts wherever possible. Where it must buy defence equipment from overseas, this new approach will ensure British workers and businesses still benefit.<\/p>\n John Healey, the chancellor, and Streeting are formally announcing this on a visit to BAE Systems Scotstoun in Glasgow today.<\/p>\n The MoD says countries like Poland, Norway and the Netherlands use similar offset policies. Further details of how this will work are set out in an offset policy paper<\/a> published today.<\/p>\n Streeting said:<\/p>\n double quotation markEvery pound we invest in defence should be judged by what it does for Britain. That\u2019s why we are backing British by buying British wherever we can.<\/p>\n Even when that is not possible, we are acting to ensure that any investment brings jobs, skills and investment back home, strengthening our national security by boosting our domestic industry.<\/p>\n In the past, the conventional globalist, free market approach to defence procurement operated on the basis that cost and quality were all that mattered and that, if a foreign firm could supply kit better and more cheaply than anyone else, that was enough. But the US is not the only country that has become protectionist in recent years, and this is a good example of Europe prioritising local employment in government procurement.<\/p>\n Share<\/a><\/p>\n Updated at\u00a006.01 EDT<\/p>\n Key events<\/p>\n Voters regard Healey’s budget as one of fairest for years, poll suggests<\/p>\n Yesterday the Institute for Fiscal Studies (see here<\/a>) and the Resolution Foundation (see here<\/a>) delivered fairly negative assessments of the budget. But mostly the gloom was triggered by the thinktanks said about the overall state of the economy and the public finances; they were critical of John Healey for deferring difficult choices, but less hostile about the decisions he did actually announce.<\/p>\n However, according to YouGov, voters are quite positive. They regard it as one of the fairest budgets for years.<\/p>\n This is how Dylan Difford explains the figures in his YouGov write-up<\/a>.<\/p>\n double quotation markThe public\u2019s initial reaction to John Healey\u2019s first budget is in some key respects broadly positive, with nearly half of Britons (45%) regarding the budget as being fair, relative to just 20% seeing the measures announced as not fair.<\/p>\n This is a notable improvement on last year, when Rachel Reeves\u2019 second budget was declared \u2018not fair\u2019 by a near-inverse margin of 48% to 21%<\/a>. In fact, on this measure, this is one of the most positively received budgets in recent times. In data going back to 2010, only George Osborne\u2019s first budget in 2010 and Rishi Sunak\u2019s Covid budgets of 2020 and March 2021 have been judged \u2018fair\u2019 by a greater proportion of Britons (50-55%).<\/p>\n The Covid budgets were both giveaway, rescue budgets, and so it is not surprising they polled well. Osborne\u2019s first budget was an austerity budget<\/a>, and it is not a model popular with Labour MPs, but it probably polled well on fairness because the pain was spread across all groups in society.<\/p>\n Polling on budgets Photograph: YouGov<\/p>\n The YouGov figures also show that only 15% of people think their family finances will improve as a result of the budget. That may not sound much but, as Difford says, \u201cthis is a sharp and favourable contrast with last November\u2019s budget, which 50% of Britons believed would leave them and their family worse off, compared to a mere 3% feeling they\u2019d be better off.\u201d<\/p>\n In fact, Healey and his first budget outperform Rachel Reeves and her budget last year on every measure assessed in the polling.<\/p>\n Polling on Healey\u2019s first budget v Reeves\u2019 last budget Photograph: YouGov<\/p>\n Yesterday one of the criticisms of the budget from the Resolution Foundation was that the energy cost of living support package helped the rich almost as much as the poor. That meant it was \u201cpoorly targeted\u201d<\/a>, said the RF, applying a progressive, social justice definition of fairness. What the YouGov poll suggests is that voters as a whole judge fairness differently; it is probably precisely because most households get the \u00a3100 energy payment <\/a>that people regard it as fair.<\/p>\n In their London Playbook briefing<\/a> for Politico yesterday, Sam Blewett and Megan McElroy said Healey used focus groups extensively before finalising his measures.<\/p>\n double quotation markGovernment officials say they focus-grouped all this relentlessly. Playbook was told these sessions helped convince ministers to go for wider support payments for council tax bands A-D rather than the initial plans to go with something more targeted. It was the supposedly better-off voters who were complaining about the pinch as well.<\/p>\n The polling showed it worked.<\/p>\n Share<\/a><\/p>\n Updated at\u00a006.52 EDT<\/p>\n MoD says under new offset policy foreign firms will only get big defence contracts if they spend equivalent amount in UK<\/p>\n Wes Streeting, the defence secretary, was on the interview round this morning, announcing a new aspect of defence procurement policy. The Ministry of Defence is now saying that, if overseas suppliers win UK defence contracts, they will be required to spend the equivalent amount in the UK.<\/p>\n Explaining the policy, the MoD says<\/a>:<\/p>\n double quotation markBritish workers, businesses and apprentices will benefit from major changes which will see more defence work carried out in the UK thanks to the launch of a world-leading Offsets policy.<\/p>\n Under the new rules, overseas companies that win significant UK defence contracts will be required to invest back into Britain, through new British jobs and apprenticeships, opening UK factories, investing in domestic suppliers, transferring technology and innovation know-how.<\/p>\n This means contracts worth over \u00a350m will be considered for offsets. The contractors will be required to deliver such benefits to the UK that could reach the same value as the contract, for example a \u00a3100m contract could see new jobs, facilities, or skills training up to the same \u00a3100m value in the UK.<\/p>\n The government is prioritising buying British defence contracts wherever possible. Where it must buy defence equipment from overseas, this new approach will ensure British workers and businesses still benefit.<\/p>\n John Healey, the chancellor, and Streeting are formally announcing this on a visit to BAE Systems Scotstoun in Glasgow today.<\/p>\n The MoD says countries like Poland, Norway and the Netherlands use similar offset policies. Further details of how this will work are set out in an offset policy paper<\/a> published today.<\/p>\n Streeting said:<\/p>\n double quotation markEvery pound we invest in defence should be judged by what it does for Britain. That\u2019s why we are backing British by buying British wherever we can.<\/p>\n Even when that is not possible, we are acting to ensure that any investment brings jobs, skills and investment back home, strengthening our national security by boosting our domestic industry.<\/p>\n In the past, the conventional globalist, free market approach to defence procurement operated on the basis that cost and quality were all that mattered and that, if a foreign firm could supply kit better and more cheaply than anyone else, that was enough. But the US is not the only country that has become protectionist in recent years, and this is a good example of Europe prioritising local employment in government procurement.<\/p>\n Share<\/a><\/p>\n Updated at\u00a006.01 EDT<\/p>\n John Swinney urges Burnham to devolve more powers to Scottish government<\/p>\n In his statement ahead of the devolution summit in Glasgow today, Andy Burnham made it clear that he is interested in transferring more power from Edinburgh to Glasgow. (See 9.11am<\/a>.) But John Swinney, the Scottish first minister, would rather talk about devolving further powers from London to Edinburgh. He issued this statement ahead of the meeting.<\/p>\n double quotation markThe prime minister has made devolution a central focus for his government. However the UK government must ensure that any devolution proposals respect devolution in Scotland. That means working with the Scottish government.<\/p>\n The Scottish government has put forward substantive proposals to the UK government on areas where further devolution would help grow Scotland\u2019s economy and I will press the prime minister, and his government, to work with us to deliver those proposals.<\/p>\n The SNP wants Scotland<\/a> to be fully independent (the ultimate version of devolution). But, pending that, it is also calling for the Scottish parliament to have power over policy areas currently reserved to London. Greater control over taxation, immigration, employment law and energy policy are particular priorities.<\/p>\n Share<\/a>Burnham admits he would have liked more radical first budget<\/p>\n Andy Burnham has admitted his first budget<\/a> as prime minister was not as radical as he would have liked because of the economic uncertainty facing the country, Kiran Stacey reports.<\/p>\n Share<\/a>Burnham says he wants to offer more \u2018regional empowerment\u2019 ahead of devolution summit with Scottish and Welsh leaders<\/p>\n Good morning. Andy Burnham is in Glasgow today for a meeting with the leaders from Scotland and Wales and he says he wants to use it to talk about \u201cthe next stage of devolution\u201d. According to the overnight briefing from No 10<\/a>, he is less interested in giving more powers to the devolved parliaments and more interested in promoting \u201cregional empowerment\u201d in their countries.<\/p>\n In his pre-summit statement, Burnham says:<\/p>\n double quotation markThrough No 10 North, we are rewiring the state. I want to make sure every city and region in the United Kingdom is part of that.<\/p>\n Today I\u2019ll be making an offer to the governments of each nation. Put politics aside and work in partnership with the UK government to develop models of regional empowerment that ensure communities can use their own strengths to unlock their potential.<\/p>\n This is the next stage of devolution. Together, there is no limit to what we can achieve.<\/p>\n Burnham is speaking at a time when Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland have since the May elections (when Plaid Cymru won in Wales) for the first time had first ministers from nationalist parties that want to break away from the UK. John Swinney, the Scottish first minister, and Rhun ap Iorwerth, the Welsh first minister, will be at the meeting today. But Michelle O\u2019Neill, the Sinn F\u00e9in first minister from Northern Ireland won\u2019t be there. She holds power jointly with a DUP deputy, and both of them have to stay away because the DUP has vetoed their attendance<\/a> due to an ongoing row about Drumcree. Some officials will attend instead.<\/p>\n Downing Street says at today\u2019s meeting Burnham \u201cwill say that devolution by default shouldn\u2019t be about the transfer of powers from one parliament to another but should go deeper within nations to empower all places and communities who know best what they need to grow and access opportunities.\u201d<\/p>\n Here is the agenda for the day.<\/p>\n