The group of seven pro-Palestine activists faced a maximum of five-year sentences, a fraction of what was promised if jurors had not deadlocked last month on the top conspiracy charge. Prosecutors announced they will not retry the charges that divided jurors Friday.
Aug 21, 2026
Updated 5:01 pm PT
Juan Carlos LaraKatie DeBenedetti
Pro-Palestinian activist and defendant Em Tillotson hugs a supporter outside the Hall of Justice in San Francisco before a sentencing hearing on Aug. 21 2026 before a sentencing hearing for seven defendants who were found guilty of blocking traffic on the Golden Gate Bridge in 2024. The Golden Gate Bridge demonstration brought traffic to a standstill on April 15, 2024. Defense arguments hinged on whether their actions were “necessary” and thus legally protected to save the lives of Palestinians in Gaza.
(Nina Glick/KQED)
A San Francisco judge sentenced seven pro-Palestinian activists to 30 days in county jail and six months of probation on Friday for their roles in a 2024 protest that stopped traffic on the Golden Gate Bridge for roughly four hours.
The San Francisco District Attorney’s Office also dismissed multiple outstanding charges, including the most serious for felony conspiracy, that the jury failed to reach a consensus on in July.
“Throughout history, civil disobedience has mostly involved accepting legal consequences,” Superior Court Judge Teresa Caffese said before handing down the sentences. “In that spirit, those who blocked the bridge and disrupted the lives of hundreds of commuters should be treated respectfully, but should also be prepared to accept the consequences of their actions.”
Defendant Rocky Chau (right) celebrates with Raye Kahn, a spokesperson for the activists, after the sentencing hearing at the Hall of Justice in San Francisco on Aug. 21, 2026.
Law enforcement had originally arrested more than two dozen people for the Tax Day demonstration, which was organized in opposition to U.S. support for Israel amid ongoing military strikes on Gaza. The seven who went to trial included six who used lockboxes to chain themselves to cars blocking southbound lanes on the bridge, complicating removal efforts. The seventh had served as a liaison between activists and law enforcement.
The sentences are significantly lighter than the 14-to-15-year maximum terms that the seven Bay Area residents — Bhavika Anandpura, River Allen, Sara Cantor, Rocky Chau, Conrad de Jesus, Sarah Ferrell and Em Tillotson — faced at the start of the trial.
Supporters of the seven defendants hug outside of the courtroom after the sentencing hearing at the Hall of Justice in San Francisco on Aug. 21, 2026.
“We have never seen a felony conspiracy charge for a protest,” Deputy Public Defender Anthony Gedeon said. “There is no rationale besides a political motivation.”
Defense attorneys believe their clients’ sentences, which require 15 days in county jail, while the other 15 can be served through the city’s Sheriff’s Work Alternative Program, will ultimately amount to just five days in jail and six in the work program. The jail sentence will be stayed pending appeal, Caffese said Friday.
Each defendant was also given six months of probation and multiple fines and restitution amounting to over $1,300.
The courtroom was quiet as Caffese delivered the sentences, but defense attorneys pushed back on the jail time, requesting an explanation and home detention for their clients, citing various personal reasons.
Caffese denied most of those requests, but she granted Cantor, who has a disability that requires her to use a cane, home detention for half of her sentence.
After the hearing, the protesters’ supporters rallied outside the court.
Defendant Em Tillotson celebrates after the sentencing hearing at the Hall of Justice in San Francisco on Aug. 21, 2026.
De Jesus thanked his co-defendants.
“In them, I have found love and support and a community that I care deeply for,” he said.
“Two years of fighting the DA has taken a toll on us mentally and physically,” de Jesus continued. “However, it only takes a moment to reflect on what Palestinians in Gaza are going through to make us fight even harder for a free Palestine.”
Prosecutors argued in court that the action was a premeditated effort to break the law and trap commuters on the Golden Gate Bridge, both inconveniencing and risking the safety of residents driving into the city.
“People missed doctors’ appointments, nurses were missing from their jobs, children were forced to defecate in bags, people had little to no water,” Assistant District Attorney Angela Roze said during the trial’s opening statements in May. “Because these seven individuals decided that their cause, their message, was more important.”
Defense attorneys argued during the trial that the defendants sincerely believed that by engaging in the April 15 protest, they could prevent the loss of Palestinian lives.
The bridge shutdown was just one of a number of actions across the country meant to disrupt economic activity and pressure the U.S. government to end its material support for Israel.
A supporter places their hand on defendant River Allen’s back outside a courtroom at the Hall of Justice in San Francisco on Aug. 21 2026, during a recess at the sentencing hearing for seven defendants who were found guilty of blocking traffic on the Golden Gate Bridge in 2024.
The Golden Gate Bridge, Highway and Transportation District filed but ultimately dropped a restitution claim against the protesters, arguing that the protest cost it $163,000 in lost bridge tolls. The defendants did pay $5,300 to a group of residents who said they suffered economic losses due to the shutdown, mostly through lost wages for the day.
Caffese addressed the defendants individually, saying that letters of support submitted on their behalf showed that they had backgrounds in community activism and service, and care about laudable causes.
“You are not being sentenced for your beliefs,” Caffese told the group.
“You, the defendants, are not new to civil disobedience,” she said. “Each of you knew you were violating the law.”