Daniel Knighton/Getty Images
After half a century in Cypress, California, Yamaha Motor Co. is packing up and heading east, way east.
The Japanese manufacturer announced it is relocating its U.S. headquarters to Kennesaw, Georgia, citing the need to cut costs and streamline operations amid rising tariff pressures (1). The move, which begins this year and runs through 2028, means Yamaha will also be selling off its California fixed assets outright, including land, offices and warehouses.
In a statement on Feb. 26 (1), Yamaha said it is “undertaking structural reforms aimed at improving the profitability of its U.S. operations in response to cost increases resulting from U.S. tariffs and changes in the market environment.”
Translation: the math stopped working in California, and it now works in Georgia.
Georgia Gov. Brian Kemp was quick to welcome the news.
“After many years of great partnership, we are honored and proud to welcome Yamaha’s American headquarters to the No. 1 state for business,” Kemp said on March 10. “This is another loud and clear testament to what we offer job creators from around the world” (2).
Yamaha’s move isn’t a one-off headline. It’s the latest chapter in a story that has been building for more than a decade.
According to research by the Public Policy Institute of California, 789 companies moved their headquarters out of California from 2011 to 2021, roughly 1.9% of all headquarters in the state at the start of that period. The number of firms who moved their headquarters out of the state went up over time, while the number moving in declined. California also lost an estimated 77,600 jobs due to those moves (3).
And the trend hasn’t slowed.
In 2025, several major relocations out of California were announced. Chevron, John Paul Mitchell Systems and Realtor.com are all moving to Texas (4). While In-N-Out Burger, a California institution since 1948, made waves when it announced a move to Tennessee, with its CEO citing the difficulty of raising a family and running a business in the state.
The broader list of California defectors in recent years includes Oracle, Tesla, SpaceX, Charles Schwab, Hewlett Packard Enterprise and Palantir, household names that collectively represent billions in tax revenue and tens of thousands of jobs.
Moving company data tells the same story from a different angle: U-Haul ranked California dead last among “growth states” for the fifth consecutive year for 2024; Atlas Van Lines reported that 60% of its 2024 California shipments were outbound, compared to just 40% inbound; while United Van Lines had similar findings — 58% outbound to 42% inbound (5).
The fiscal outlook adds to the pressure. California faces a projected $50 billion to $70 billion deficit in 2025-2026, a near one-eighty from the $97 billion surplus it recorded in 2021-2022, according to reporting by The Real Deal (4). Tax revenue can erode quickly when, as the outlet notes, “wealthy residents and major employers leave.”
The contrast between how California and Georgia approach job creators couldn’t be sharper, and the gap has become a centerpiece of the economic debate around corporate relocation.
California levies the highest state income tax rate in the nation at 13.3% on top earners (6) (compared to 5.19% in Georgia) and its corporate income tax rate of 8.84% (7) is among the steepest in the country. But taxes are only part of the picture.
According to the Hoover Institution (8), businesses leave California due to “taxes, regulations, litigation costs, labor costs, energy and utility costs, and employee cost of living.” California’s permitting process is widely regarded as one of the most cumbersome in the U.S., and its regulatory environment can mean high compliance costs.
Georgia has deliberately built its identity around being the opposite of that. The state has now been recognized as No. 1 for business by Area Development magazine for 12 consecutive years, an unmatched record in the publication’s history (9). The ranking is based on scores from consultants who work directly with companies making real investment decisions.
Gov. Kemp, himself a former small business owner, recently laid out the state’s approach in plain terms in an interview with Forbes (10).
“We have stayed true to a simple formula: trust job creators and get government out of the way,” he said. “That’s why it has been a priority to tackle the top three things that kill deals: a burdensome tax code, slow permits and lack of available sites.”
Kemp went on to describe Georgia’s investment in what he calls “speed to market” policies — a concept that deserves attention from any company evaluating a relocation.
Read More: 8 essential money moves to make once you’ve saved $10,000
Read More: You can now invest in this $1B private real estate fund starting at just $10
“We invested heavily in our Rural Site Development Initiative, where the state partners directly with local development authorities to grade land, put in infrastructure and turn what some partners have called ‘fields of dreams’ into ‘ready-made sites’ before a company even looks at them,” he explained.
“… Through our Georgia Ready for Accelerated Development (GRAD) program, we do the heavy lifting upfront so that when a business is ready to build, they aren’t waiting on us.”
For a manufacturer like Yamaha, racing to restructure its U.S. operations amid tariff pressures, the ability to move quickly is not a minor convenience. It’s a material business advantage.
It would be unfair not to note that the California story is more complicated than a pure exodus narrative.
Migration data shows a large decline in the number of higher-income adults moving out, 28% fewer leaving in 2024 versus the peak in 2021 (11). California’s population has also grown in recent years, buoyed by international immigration that offsets domestic outflows (12).
And the state retains extraordinary advantages: the largest economy of any U.S. state, world-class research universities, deep venture capital networks and unmatched concentration of tech talent.
Researchers at the Public Policy Institute of California have also cautioned that headquarter relocations should not be viewed in isolation. Far more headquarters launched (17%) or closed (30%) over the same period than relocated, and those latter events had a larger impact on employment overall (3).
Still, the direction of travel, both literal and figurative, is hard to ignore. California had the highest net outflow of domestic companies across the U.S. from 2015 to 2025 (13).
Yamaha’s decision to leave California isn’t a dramatic act of protest. It’s a business decision, made by executives weighing costs against returns.
But when that calculus plays out the same way, in favor of states like Georgia, Texas, Tennessee or Florida, hundreds of times over a decade, the cumulative effect reshapes not just corporate maps, but tax bases, job markets and the economic fortunes of millions of people on both sides of the ledger.
Join 250,000+ readers and get Moneywise’s best stories and exclusive interviews first — clear insights curated and delivered weekly. Subscribe now.
We rely only on vetted sources and credible third-party reporting. For details, see our editorial ethics and guidelines.
Yamaha Motor Co., Ltd (1); WALB News 10 (2); Public Policy Institute of California (3), (11); The Real Deal (4); KTLA 5 Morning News (5); Tax Foundation (6), (7); Hoover Institution (8); Area Development (9); Forbes (10); Los Angeles Times (12); Financial Times (13)
This article provides information only and should not be construed as advice. It is provided without warranty of any kind.