Sheryl Davis, pictured in 2024, was once San Francisco’s most powerful civil rights watchdog. On Monday, she was arrested after District Attorney Brooke Jenkins filed a raft of felony financial misconduct charges against her.
Manuel Orbegozo/For the S.F. Chronicle
James Spingola, pictured in 2018, is the former CEO of Collective Impact, a nonprofit Davis funded. He was also arrested on felony financial misconduct charges on Monday.
Santiago Mejia/S.F. Chronicle
Regarding “Top S.F. official who led Dream Keeper equity program charged with felonies: ‘abuse of power’” (San Francisco, SFChronicle.com, March 30): The arrest of Sheryl Davis and James Spingola demands what our justice system requires: a fair and full investigation, and the presumption of innocence until guilt is proven.
That standard must be applied with integrity, however, because there is more at stake than a criminal case.
San Francisco’s African American community has endured decades of displacement, divestment and erasure. Our population has declined dramatically. Our neighborhoods have been transformed beyond recognition.
Article continues below this ad
Against that tide, programs like the Dream Keeper Initiative represented a rare and intentional investment in Black life in this city — an acknowledgment that the promise of San Francisco must extend to all its residents.
The alleged actions of individuals, however serious, must not become ammunition against an entire community, nor be used to further malign Black leadership or to justify rolling back investments in African American education, housing, economic development and community health.
San Francisco Chronicle Logo
Make us a Preferred Source to get more of our news when you search.
Add Preferred Source
The mission behind these investments is bigger than any individual. No scandal should be permitted to erase the legitimate needs that gave rise to them, and San Franciscans of conscience must not allow that to happen.
The Rev. Devon Jerome Crawford, senior pastor, Third Baptist Church of San Francisco
Article continues below this ad
Diablo Canyon unnecessary
Regarding “California should extend Diablo Canyon nuclear plant’s lifespan to address state’s energy needs” (Open Forum, SFChronicle.com, March 30): Renewable generation plus storage is a more cost-effective, flexible option for power than keeping Diablo Canyon nuclear power plant running.
There was plenty of excess generating capacity before Diablo Canyon’s life extension was approved, and more is added every year.
Renewables and storage also create many more good-paying jobs than Diablo Canyon, where many of the employees are temporary contractors. Extending the life of Diablo Canyon will postpone, not eliminate, its decommissioning, which will cost ratepayers $4 billion.
In the meantime, additional spent nuclear fuel will be created and stored on site, creating a long-term hazard with no existing solution.
Article continues below this ad
Only Chavez could lead
Regarding “Why is the Filipino American who co-founded the UFW with Cesar Chavez nearly forgotten?” (Opinion, SFChronicle.com, March 26): It certainly is easy to Monday morning quarterback a movement that had a lot of moving parts.
From the Filipino American farm workers to Dolores Huerta and the volunteers and intellectuals who supported the movement, all were instrumental in shaping the message to the American public.
But it was left to Cesar Chavez to carry the message forward and be the leader of an emerging union to fight the agricultural industry that had subjugated workers in the fields.
Article continues below this ad
Could someone else have carried the banner of the United Farm Workers and kept it from imploding into acrimony and infighting amongst all the powerful personalities?
No. That task was left to Chavez.
Yes, change the name of all the parks, public buildings and streets named after him and banish his name as an iconic leader.
That can’t change how the UFW became a force, not despite Chavez, but because of him.
Sergio Carabarin, San Jose
Article continues below this ad
No kings in Oakland
Regarding “Barbara Lee thinks ‘strong mayor’ reforms could help fix Oakland’s problems. The council stands in her path” (East Bay, SFChronicle.com, March 27): Monday’s Chronicle print edition juxtaposed a story about the No Kings protests with one about Barbara Lee wanting to be a “strong mayor” in Oakland.
I don’t live in Oakland, but I hope that voters there can see the similarities.
A strong mayor concentrates power in a single person, much the same way our president wants to wield his executive power. I believe democracy in Oakland will be stronger if decisions are made by the City Council, allowing multiple voices of the community to be heard and a consensus through compromise.
Guest opinions in Open Forum and Insight are produced by writers with expertise, personal experience or original insights on a subject of interest to our readers. Their views do not necessarily reflect the opinion of The Chronicle editorial board, which is committed to providing a diversity of ideas to our readership.
Read more about our transparency and ethics policies
Oakland should have a strong democracy, not a strong mayor. It would be a shame to go to a No Kings protest one day and vote for a king-like system the next.
Of course, San Francisco should reconsider its king-like system as well.
Victor Damiani, San Francisco