A ship passes under the Golden Gate Bridge for the Parade of Ships during Fleet Week in October. 2024. A lengthy new report deemed the bridge exceptionally safe from ship strikes.
Lea Suzuki/S.F. Chronicle
A cargo ship makes its way under the Golden Gate Bridge in hazy air in 2023.
Carlos Avila Gonzalez/S.F. Chronicle
The John S. McCain, an Arleigh Burke-class destroyer, is escorted beneath the Golden Gate Bridge during the Parade of Ships at Fleet Week in October 2021.
Jungho Kim/For the S.F. Chronicle
The John P. Murtha, a Navy amphibious transport ship, arrives under the Golden Gate Bridge for Fleet Week in October 2023.
Josh Edelson/For the S.F. Chronicle
In 1933, decades before modern engineering standards, construction began on the Golden Gate Bridge.
Now, nearly a century later, a 206-page engineering report looked at a worrying prospect: the risk of a massive ship striking the base of a tower.
Article continues below this ad
The Golden Gate Bridge, the analysis found, is exceptionally safe.
“We’re very happy that those who designed the bridge designed it the way they did so we don’t have to worry,” Golden Gate Bridge District Engineer John Eberle said at the March meeting of the district’s board of directors.
Engineers modeled worst-case scenarios, including ships veering off course, striking at speed and hitting critical supports, according to the report published in March. They found the bridge has multiple layers of defense that make collapse extremely unlikely.
San Francisco Chronicle Logo
Make us a Preferred Source to get more of our news when you search.
Add Preferred Source
The study estimates the probability of a ship strike causing a collapse at roughly 1 in 40,000 to 70,000 in any given year. The modern benchmark is less than 1 in 10,000.
Article continues below this ad
And those estimates don’t take account of nonstructural safety measures like tug escorts and vessel traffic control, meaning the actual risk is likely even lower.
The report was commissioned by the bridge district following the collapse of the Francis Scott Key Bridge in Baltimore, which was due to a ship strike. Concern quickly surged nationwide about whether other major bridges, especially older ones, could withstand similar impacts. The National Transportation Safety Board identified 68 bridges across the U.S. and recommended their owners take on complex vulnerability assessments, including San Francisco’s landmark span.
The Bay Bridge was not subject to this recommendation, but Bay Area Toll Authority staff are preparing to brief officials on vessel strike vulnerabilities next month. Similar studies for the Antioch, Benicia-Martinez, Carquinez, Richmond-San Rafael and San Mateo-Hayward bridges, commissioned by Caltrans at the request of the National Transportation Safety Board, are underway.
The resilience of the Golden Gate Bride partly comes from sheer strength. The south tower, on the San Francisco side, is described in the report as a “robust structural feature like no other” and is surrounded by a reinforced concrete protective shell up to 28 feet thick. It can withstand about 50,000 kips of force, or roughly 25,000 tons. In many cases, engineers found, a ship would crumple and absorb its own impact energy before it could seriously damage the structure.
Article continues below this ad
The bridge also has geographic defenses.
The north tower, on the Marin side, is considered the most vulnerable point. While it lacks the south tower’s thick protective barrier, shallow water surrounding the tower acts as a natural shield. Fully loaded ships sit deeper in the water and would likely run aground before colliding with the structure.
Instead, the main risk comes from lighter, partially loaded vessels that travel higher in the water and could hit the tower’s steel legs. Even then, engineers said, the chance of a collapse remains extremely small.
While thousands of ships travel under the bridge in one of the busiest waterways in the United States, only 25 vessels large enough to cause damage pass under the bridge’s massive 4,200-foot span each day on average, and large vessels rarely pass close to one another.
And unlike many ports, there is no defined navigation channel beneath the span. Still, ships tend to follow broad, predictable paths, which reduces the chance of a direct strike.
Article continues below this ad
A catastrophic failure would require a rare chain of events. A ship would have to drift off course, plow through natural barriers and strike with enough strength.
Engineers say the probability of such a scenario is exceedingly small.
The bridge is also undergoing a major seismic retrofit, including $870 million worth of upgrades to both towers and spans at the structure’s north and south ends.