\n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe recent closure of a California oil refinery \u2014 and plans to shutter another in the near future \u2014 have some experts warning of potential fuel shortages and price spikes in Nevada and other Western states that depend on the Golden State.California supplies roughly 88% of Nevada\u2019s fuel, including diesel and jet fuel. But Phillips 66 closed a refinery in the Los Angeles area in October, and earlier this year, Valero submitted a notice that it plans to close a Bay Area refinery by April 2026. Combined, the two refineries produce 284,000 barrels of oil per day, about 17% of the state\u2019s refining capacity.Though there are several reasons for refinery closures, it comes as California is trying to achieve net-zero carbon emissions by 2045, including by slashing oil use.\u201cIf you limit the supply of fuel coming out of California, you\u2019re going to see that cost increase,\u201d Paul Enos, CEO of the Nevada Trucking Association, told The Nevada Independent. \u201cThe policies that they make there have an impact (on) every citizen of Nevada.\u201dGov. Joe Lombardo has repeatedly raised concerns about Nevada\u2019s fuel insecurity, framing it as a safety issue if shortages cripple transportation hubs or first responder operations. Along with the Nevada Commission on Homeland Security, Lombardo recently formed a fuel resiliency subcommittee that he said is designed to \u201cdevelop long-term strategies that strengthen our infrastructure, diversify supply routes, and protect Nevada\u2019s future.\u201dThe potential for a rise in prices from the refinery closures is what will mitigate potential shortages, said Elliott Parker, professor and economics chair at UNR.\u201cYou\u2019ve got to get people to drive less if you have less supply,\u201d he said. \u201cThat comes with a cost \u2014 if you don\u2019t let the prices go up, then you will have shortages.\u201dThe need for \u2018bipartisan, regional communication\u2019Almost all the gas, diesel and jet fuel consumed in the Las Vegas Valley is transported via the CalNev pipeline, which runs from Los Angeles to Las Vegas; another gas line runs from the Bay Area to Reno, and a third runs from Salt Lake City to Las Vegas.In 2019, the fuel line that runs between the Bay Area and Reno was shut down as wildfires burned in California; in 2023, Gov. Joe Lombardo declared a state of emergency when the pipeline between Las Vegas and Los Angeles (which also serves Nellis and Edwards Air Force bases and McCarran International Airport) was temporarily shut down.Earlier this year, the CalNev pipeline was again temporarily shut off because of wildfires.Interspersed with the disruptions, California has passed multiple pieces of legislation targeting the oil industry, including creating an independent watchdog to monitor oil companies for price gouging; passing an electric vehicle mandate to eliminate the sale of new, gasoline-powered vehicles (which has since been blocked by the Republican-led U.S. Senate ); and authorizing state energy regulators to require refineries to maintain a minimum inventory of fuel.Lombardo, a Republican, and Democratic Arizona Gov. Katie Hobbs in 2024 jointly penned a letter to California’s Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom, expressing the need for \u201cbipartisan, regional communication\u201d when it came to California passing legislation that could have ripple effects on Western fuel supplies.Four decades ago, more than 40 refineries operated in California. Now, the state is on pace to have just seven by the end of 2026 because of high operating and regulatory compliance costs, the political environment, conversions to bio and renewable fuels, and various state directives, Mische wrote in a paper.Some companies have consolidated while others have focused on production at more efficient facilities \u2014 but the reduction has shrunk the state\u2019s refining capacity from 2.38 million barrels of oil per day to 1.64 million barrels.The closures, though, are aligning with California\u2019s initiatives to reduce driving and lower carbon emissions. While California\u2019s population was 6% higher in 2024 than in 2010, gasoline sales were 5% lower, said Elliott Parker, professor and economics chair at UNR.\u201cIn a sense, the California policy is working to make gas more expensive to get people to switch to electric vehicles and hybrid cars,\u201d he said.\u2018Scary for consumers\u2019With the refinery closures, some experts are forecasting price spikes as high as $8 per gallon \u2014 others are projecting more modest increases under $1.50 per gallon.Nevadans already pay well over the national average because of its reliance on California fuel, which consistently ranks among the most expensive for gas. As the national average for a gallon of gas dipped below $3 for the first time in four years in December, Nevadans continued to pay 75 cents to $1 more.Nevada gets the remainder of its fuel from Utah, where at least one lawmaker is floating a bill for the state\u2019s 2026 legislative session that would reassess its gas tax structure by shifting the levy onto fuel exports, such as the gas that makes its way into Nevada.Nevada is \u201cin a very vulnerable situation,\u201d said Michael Mische, a University of Southern California associate professor and industry expert.Sinclair Gas has announced potential expansions into Nevada, but any pipeline and infrastructure construction would take time. By next summer, Nevadans are likely to start feeling pain at the pump, said Miranda Hoover, state executive for the Energy and Convenience Association of Nevada, a trade association that represents liquid fuel and lubricant distributors, transporters, retailers and convenience store owners.\u201cIt\u2019s very scary for consumers, businesses (and) families working on a tight budget,\u201d she said.Low-income households and small businesses, which already spend a higher share of income on transportation and often have limited ability to reduce driving or absorb sudden cost increases, are hit first and hardest by price spikes, Caitlin Gatchalian, Nevada representative at the Southwest Energy Efficiency Project, wrote in an email.\u201cThe refinery closures in California expose a real vulnerability in Nevada\u2019s transportation fuel system,\u201d wrote Gatchalian, whose group advocates for clean energy and transportation. \u201cPeople and goods still need to move.\u201dGovernor braces for impactThe newly created fuel resiliency subcommittee will explore options to expand infrastructure and storage, recommend policies for emergency response and coordinate with other agencies to accelerate permitting for critical infrastructure projects. Its first meeting is expected this month.Oil production within the state, however, is unlikely to increase. Nevada lacks substantial crude oil reserves. In 1990, the state reached a high, producing more than 4 million barrels of oil, but that amount has steadily declined. Last year, Nevada produced around 170,000 barrels, a blip in the national production of well over 13 million barrels of oil per day.Citing threats to homeland security if fuel supplies to first responders and transportation hubs are compromised, Lombardo\u2019s office has said it\u2019s critical the state take a proactive approach.\u201cEnergy security touches every part of daily life, and waiting until fuel disruptions are visible to the public is already too late,\u201d Chase McNamara, the governor\u2019s policy adviser on natural resources, told The Nevada Independent.McNamara did not elaborate on who will serve on the subcommittee, but did say it could include somewhere between 10 and 20 appointments.Meanwhile, Sinclair Gas has announced it is evaluating a multiphased expansion across Western fuel markets, particularly in Nevada and California, that would supply as many as 150,000 barrels per day. The first phase, which includes \u201cdebottlenecking\u201d its pipeline from Salt Lake City to Las Vegas, would move a projected 35,000 barrels per day from the Rockies into Nevada with a target operational date of 2028.If the project comes online in time and can deliver its target amounts of oil, that would go a long way toward alleviating Nevada\u2019s issues, Mische said.Sinclair has also floated the idea of building a new lateral pipeline from Salt Lake City to Reno, and a pipeline expansion between Texas and Phoenix could benefit Nevada as major oil companies consider a pipeline between Phoenix and Las Vegas, Hoover said.\u201cWe are looking at any and all options,\u201d she said, including \u201cplanning for the future of energy diversification in the state where we don\u2019t run into this again.\u201dParker, the UNR economist, questioned if Nevada\u2019s government has the clout to sway what happens outside the state. With one-tenth the population of California, \u201cI don\u2019t think there\u2019s much Nevada can do,\u201d he said. \u201cWe\u2019re a small part of the market.\u201dThe bigger question, he said, is what California wants to do.\u201cDoes California want to intervene to try to increase refinery capacity or do they want to say \u2018Yeah, it\u2019s kind of a good thing to have higher prices?\u2019\u201d he asked.___This story was originally published by The Nevada Independent and distributed through a partnership with The Associated Press.\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/p>\n
The recent closure of a California oil refinery \u2014 and plans to shutter another in the near future \u2014 have some experts warning of potential fuel shortages<\/a> and price spikes in Nevada and other Western states that depend on the Golden State.<\/p>\n California supplies roughly 88% of Nevada\u2019s fuel, including diesel and jet fuel. But Phillips 66 closed<\/a> a refinery in the Los Angeles area in October, and earlier this year, Valero submitted a notice<\/a> that it plans to close a Bay Area refinery by April 2026. Combined, the two refineries produce 284,000 barrels<\/a> of oil per day, about 17% of the state\u2019s refining capacity.<\/p>\n Though there are several reasons for refinery closures, it comes as California is trying to achieve net-zero carbon emissions by 2045, including by slashing oil use<\/a>.<\/p>\n \u201cIf you limit the supply of fuel coming out of California, you\u2019re going to see that cost increase,\u201d Paul Enos, CEO of the Nevada Trucking Association, told The Nevada Independent. \u201cThe policies that they make there have an impact (on) every citizen of Nevada.\u201d<\/p>\n Gov. Joe Lombardo has repeatedly raised concerns about Nevada\u2019s fuel insecurity, framing it as a safety issue if shortages cripple transportation hubs or first responder operations. Along with the Nevada Commission on Homeland Security, Lombardo recently formed a fuel resiliency subcommittee that he said is designed to \u201cdevelop long-term strategies that strengthen our infrastructure, diversify supply routes, and protect Nevada\u2019s future.\u201d<\/p>\n The potential for a rise in prices from the refinery closures is what will mitigate potential shortages, said Elliott Parker, professor and economics chair at UNR.<\/p>\n \u201cYou\u2019ve got to get people to drive less if you have less supply,\u201d he said. \u201cThat comes with a cost \u2014 if you don\u2019t let the prices go up, then you will have shortages.\u201d<\/p>\n The need for \u2018bipartisan, regional communication\u2019<\/p>\n Almost all the gas, diesel and jet fuel consumed in the Las Vegas Valley is transported via the CalNev pipeline, which runs from Los Angeles to Las Vegas; another gas line runs from the Bay Area to Reno, and a third runs from Salt Lake City to Las Vegas.<\/p>\n In 2019, the fuel line that runs between the Bay Area and Reno was shut down<\/a> as wildfires burned in California; in 2023, Gov. Joe Lombardo declared a state of emergency<\/a> when the pipeline between Las Vegas and Los Angeles (which also serves Nellis and Edwards Air Force bases and McCarran International Airport) was temporarily shut down.<\/p>\n Earlier this year, the CalNev pipeline was again temporarily shut off<\/a> because of wildfires.<\/p>\n Interspersed with the disruptions, California has passed multiple pieces of legislation targeting the oil industry, including creating an independent watchdog<\/a> to monitor oil companies for price gouging; passing an electric vehicle mandate to eliminate the sale of new, gasoline-powered vehicles (which has since been blocked by the Republican-led U.S. Senate<\/a> ); and authorizing state energy regulators to require refineries to maintain a minimum inventory of fuel<\/a>.<\/p>\n Lombardo, a Republican, and Democratic Arizona Gov. Katie Hobbs in 2024 jointly penned a letter to California’s Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom, expressing the need for \u201cbipartisan, regional communication\u201d when it came to California passing legislation that could have ripple effects on Western fuel supplies.<\/p>\n Four decades ago, more than 40 refineries operated in California. Now, the state is on pace to have just seven by the end of 2026 because of high operating and regulatory compliance costs, the political environment, conversions to bio and renewable fuels, and various state directives, Mische wrote in a paper.<\/p>\n Some companies have consolidated while others have focused on production at more efficient facilities \u2014 but the reduction has shrunk the state\u2019s refining capacity<\/a> from 2.38 million barrels of oil per day to 1.64 million barrels.<\/p>\n The closures, though, are aligning with California\u2019s initiatives to reduce driving and lower carbon emissions. While California\u2019s population was 6% higher in 2024 than in 2010, gasoline sales were 5% lower, said Elliott Parker, professor and economics chair at UNR.<\/p>\n \u201cIn a sense, the California policy is working to make gas more expensive to get people to switch to electric vehicles and hybrid cars,\u201d he said.<\/p>\n \u2018Scary for consumers\u2019<\/p>\n With the refinery closures, some experts are forecasting price spikes as high as $8 per gallon<\/a> \u2014 others are projecting more modest increases under $1.50 per gallon.<\/p>\n Nevadans already pay well over the national average because of its reliance on California fuel, which consistently ranks among the most expensive for gas. As the national average<\/a> for a gallon of gas dipped below $3 for the first time in four years in December, Nevadans continued to pay 75 cents to $1 more.<\/p>\n Nevada gets the remainder of its fuel from Utah, where at least one lawmaker is floating a bill for the state\u2019s 2026 legislative session<\/a> that would reassess its gas tax structure by shifting the levy onto fuel exports, such as the gas that makes its way into Nevada.<\/p>\n Nevada is \u201cin a very vulnerable situation,\u201d said Michael Mische, a University of Southern California associate professor and industry expert.<\/p>\n Sinclair Gas has announced potential expansions into Nevada, but any pipeline and infrastructure construction would take time. By next summer, Nevadans are likely to start feeling pain at the pump, said Miranda Hoover, state executive for the Energy and Convenience Association of Nevada, a trade association that represents liquid fuel and lubricant distributors, transporters, retailers and convenience store owners.<\/p>\n \u201cIt\u2019s very scary for consumers, businesses (and) families working on a tight budget,\u201d she said.<\/p>\n Low-income households and small businesses, which already spend a higher share of income on transportation and often have limited ability to reduce driving or absorb sudden cost increases, are hit first and hardest by price spikes, Caitlin Gatchalian, Nevada representative at the Southwest Energy Efficiency Project, wrote in an email.<\/p>\n \u201cThe refinery closures in California expose a real vulnerability in Nevada\u2019s transportation fuel system,\u201d wrote Gatchalian, whose group advocates for clean energy and transportation. \u201cPeople and goods still need to move.\u201d<\/p>\n Governor braces for impact<\/p>\n The newly created fuel resiliency subcommittee will explore options to expand infrastructure and storage, recommend policies for emergency response and coordinate with other agencies to accelerate permitting for critical infrastructure projects. Its first meeting is expected this month.<\/p>\n Oil production within the state, however, is unlikely to increase. Nevada lacks substantial crude oil reserves<\/a>. In 1990, the state reached a high, producing more than 4 million barrels of oil, but that amount has steadily declined. Last year, Nevada produced around 170,000 barrels<\/a>, a blip in the national production of well over 13 million barrels of oil per day.<\/p>\n Citing threats to homeland security if fuel supplies to first responders and transportation hubs are compromised, Lombardo\u2019s office has said it\u2019s critical the state take a proactive approach.<\/p>\n \u201cEnergy security touches every part of daily life, and waiting until fuel disruptions are visible to the public is already too late,\u201d Chase McNamara, the governor\u2019s policy adviser on natural resources, told The Nevada Independent.<\/p>\n McNamara did not elaborate on who will serve on the subcommittee, but did say it could include somewhere between 10 and 20 appointments.<\/p>\n