Wednesday, the Rules Committee for the San Diego City Council will consider Councilmember Sean Elo-Rivera\u2019s push for a tax on empty second homes and vacation rentals. He and his supporters have polled the issue and asked whether voters supported an up-to $5,000 per bedroom annual tax on vacation rentals.<\/p>\n
The business community and AirBnB seem to see it as an existential threat.<\/p>\n
First, the argument for:\u00a0As announced at Politifest, Elo-Rivera wants the city to start seeing tourism differently: not as a precious industry that needs to be coddled and nurtured but instead like oil in Norway: An incredibly valuable resource that the city should extract more social benefits from.<\/p>\n
This post first appeared in the Politics Report<\/a>. That\u2019s our exclusive newsletter for Voice of San Diego members. Become a member today<\/a> and subscribe. <\/p>\n \u201cThe city needs resources to provide residents the things they want and need,\u201d he said. \u201cThat conversation should begin with those with most means who do not live here.\u201d<\/p>\n He said we have not even captured the cost of serving tourists, pointing out, for example, that most of the rescues lifeguards must perform every summer are to save visitors. And he\u2019s aiming at vacation rentals in particular because of their impact on neighborhoods.<\/p>\n \u201cWe have neighborhoods that are not neighborhoods because speculators and investors see every home in them with dollar signs and have detached themselves from the impacts of what they\u2019re doing to them,\u201d he said.<\/p>\n The tax would bring in money the city could use for its essential services and it would provide incentives for owners to put the homes back onto the market.<\/p>\n The argument against:\u00a0The Chamber of Commerce started sending text messages to voters this week asking them to call members of the City Council to oppose the tax.<\/p>\n \u201cWe, the chamber, are tired of the targeted attacks on industries, particularly tourism,\u201d said Chris Cate, the CEO of the San Diego Regional Chamber of Commerce. He said short-term vacation rentals have always been a part of San Diego\u2019s tourism industry and the city spent years finding the right balance between taxing them and regulating them and allowing them to thrive.<\/p>\n AirBnB\u2019s public policy senior manager Justin Wesson also released a written statement:<\/p>\n \u201cMore than 81 percent of Airbnb hosts in San Diego are local residents, and more than half say the income earned through hosting has helped them stay in their home. Airbnb supports meaningful solutions that help generate and protect local revenue across the state, but a hefty tax that significantly raises costs for residents who occasionally share their home to make extra money is not the right approach. We welcome the opportunity to work with City Council on legislative efforts that would actually help bolster affordability in the city.\u201d<\/p>\n Elo-Rivera took issue with the idea that this was an attack on the tourism industry in general. Vacation rentals are a small slice of the industry and the public does not feel like they pay their fair share.<\/p>\n \u201cIf anything narrow like this we do is going to be received as an attack on the tourism industry as a whole, that is a posture that will force everyday San Diegans to unfairly bear the burden of that industry extracting tremendous wealth and not giving back to San Diego,\u201d Elo-Rivera said.<\/p>\n AirBnB\u2019s implied threat:\u00a0The company did a poll recently asking voters if they supported the 2022 ballot Measure B, which allowed the city to begin collecting a fee for trash collection. This year, the City Council and mayor implemented the fee at a much higher rate than they said it would be when Measure B passed.<\/p>\n The implication is that AirBnB and others may strike back try to put a measure on the ballot repealing the trash fee, which would blow a massive hole in the city\u2019s budget.<\/p>\n The suggestion that could happen made Elo-Rivera irate. Repealing the fee would lead to the closure of parks and libraries, massive layoffs at the city and the browning out of fire stations and more.<\/p>\n \u201cAnyone who suggests this should be completely ashamed of themselves should be a pariah in any serous San Diego circle and not be considered a member of the problem-solving community,\u201d he said.<\/p>\n A June vote:\u00a0He hopes the measure would make it on the June primary ballot. You may remember a movement to ensure major ballot decisions do not go on primary ballots because they should be weighed by the most voters possible. It became Measure L in 2016.<\/p>\n \u201cSpecial interests and political insiders attempt to exert more influence during the primary when decisions can be made by small fraction of registered voters,\u201d\u00a0said<\/a>\u00a0then City Council President Sheri Lightner.<\/p>\n Elo-Rivera pointed out that was for ballot initiatives from signatures not for Council actions.<\/p>\n He said he has the support of the advocates of Measure L, most prominently Alliance San Diego.<\/p>\n \u201cIt\u2019s not a community concern,\u201d he said. And they need the money. \u201cWe are doing it for the very practical purpose that the problems we\u2019re solving for need to be solved as soon as possible.\u201d<\/p>\n