voter initiative<\/a> to modernize and streamline the review process for building the state\u2019s most essential projects.<\/p>\nThe initiative was carefully crafted to protect the environment while ensuring that plans for much-needed housing, clean energy, reliable water supplies, and public health and safety facilities are reviewed in a timely manner.<\/p>\n
Balance, Not Bureaucracy<\/p>\n
For decades, oversight has too often been co-opted by obstruction, threatening the common good:<\/p>\n
A multifamily housing project in Contra Costa County weathered a decade of lawsuits, a ballot referendum, and more than 100 public hearings before an appeals court dismissed the CEQA objections in 2022.
\nThe lengthy CEQA process over plans to link electricity transmission lines to renewable energy resources in the Imperial Valley extended the project by seven years.
\nA plan to move the Alameda Food Bank across the street to a new facility was delayed after two residents argued that CEQA required the preservation of a \u201chistoric\u201d parking lot.
\nWhen the University of California, Berkeley proposed badly needed student housing, opponents crafted a novel argument that CEQA covered the impact of noise made by students.
\nNine years passed between state officials initiating review of reinforcements of Perris Dam in Riverside County and final approval by an appeals court.
\nPlans for a bicycle path near the Los Angeles River have been challenged under CEQA because opponents claim it might frighten horses that use a nearby trail.<\/p>\n
These kinds of delays add billions of dollars in costs while making it harder to meet the state\u2019s affordability and environmental goals.<\/p>\n
Timely Decisions, Protected Safeguards <\/p>\n
Legislators have previously approved narrow project exemptions, but it\u2019s time to actually modernize the 55-year-old law.<\/p>\n
The Building an Affordable California Act restores the \u201cproductive harmony\u201d that\u2019s been cast aside over the past five decades:<\/p>\n
Essential projects would be subject to sensible, firm deadlines for environmental review.
\nGovernment officials would have 365 days to approve or deny applications. After that, applicants could ask for a public hearing and a final vote within 60 days.
\nOptions to resolve concerns would be limited to either the proposed project, an alternative that reduces environmental impacts, or no project at all.
\nThere would be new timelines for legal challenges, too. Courts would be required to distinguish between reasonable concerns and those of activists whose \u201cnot in my backyard\u201d viewpoints currently are allowed to delay or deny vital projects.
\nCommunities retain their control over approving local development. This is not a one-size-fits-all approach to meeting California\u2019s needs.
\nEssential projects must meet the state\u2019s strong labor standards and protections.
\nImportant environmental protections such as mitigation, habitat protection, and public comment periods would remain in place.<\/p>\n
The initiative will create predictability for improvements the state desperately needs \u2013 including the building of first responder facilities, wildfire resilience projects, and broadband in underserved communities.<\/p>\n
Californians deserve a law that recognizes prosperity isn\u2019t the enemy of preservation.<\/p>\n
Modernizing that law won\u2019t just ease California\u2019s affordability crisis and boost our economy \u2013 it will prove the naysayers wrong about our state.<\/p>\n
Let\u2019s get busy. It\u2019s time to build an affordable California.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"It\u2019s politically popular these days to talk about making the Golden State more affordable, perhaps because we can…\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":17053,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[6],"tags":[14705,7,9,8,10174],"class_list":["post-17052","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-california","tag-building-an-affordable-california","tag-california","tag-california-headlines","tag-california-news","tag-ceqa"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/17052","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=17052"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/17052\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/17053"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=17052"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=17052"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=17052"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}
![\"Commentary](\"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/CommentaryJenniferai.png\")
<\/p>\n