SACRAMENTO\u00a0\u2014\u00a0Every farmer knows there comes a time to thin the crop to allow the most promising plants to grow bigger and reach their potential.<\/p>\n
The same is true in politics. And it\u2018s now time to cull some Democrats from the dense field of candidates for governor.<\/p>\n
Put another way, it\u2019s time for some lagging Democrats to step aside and provide more running room for swifter teammates in the race to replace Gov. Gavin Newsom.<\/p>\n
You’re reading the L.A. Times Politics newsletter <\/p>\n
George Skelton and Michael Wilner cover the insights, legislation, players and politics you need to know in 2024. In your inbox Monday and Thursday mornings. <\/p>\n
By continuing, you agree to our Terms of Service<\/a> and our Privacy Policy<\/a>. <\/p>\n Sure, they\u2019ve all got a constitutional right to run. But too many Democrats on the June 2 primary ballot could flip the California governor\u2019s office to a Republican.<\/a> <\/p>\n You\u2019d think that Democratic candidates now plodding behind in the race \u2014 with little realistic hope of catching up \u2014 would want to avoid having that on their conscience. Party leaders, too.<\/p>\n Until recently, this nightmarish scenario for Democrats seemed inconceivable. After all, California hasn\u2019t elected a Republican to statewide office for 20 years. Roughly 45% of registered voters are Democrats. Only 25% are Republicans. About 23% are independents who lean left.<\/p>\n But do the math. There are nine Democrats running for governor with various degrees of seriousness. There are only two major Republican contenders, plus a third lagging practically out of sight.<\/p>\n Remember, California has a \u201ctop two\u201d open primary. The top two vote-getters, regardless of their party, advance to the November election. And only the top two. Write-in candidates aren\u2019t allowed.<\/p>\n It\u2019s a matter of arithmetic.<\/p>\n In the primary, about 60% of voters will choose a Democrat, political data expert Paul Mitchell figures. That number of voters split among nine Democratic candidates could result in all sharing smaller pieces of the pie than what the top two Republicans receive. Mitchell estimates nearly 40% of voters will side with a Republican, with just two candidates splitting most of the smaller GOP pie.<\/p>\n Recent polls have shown three candidates \u2014 two Republicans and one Democrat \u2014 bunched closely near the top. They\u2019re Republican former Fox News commentator Steve Hilton, Democratic U.S. Rep. Eric Swalwell from the San Francisco Bay Area, and Republican Sheriff Chad Bianco of Riverside County.<\/p>\n Another Democrat, former Rep. Katie Porter of Orange County, has been running close to the top three, followed by Democrat Tom Steyer, a billionaire former hedge fund investor.<\/p>\n It\u2019s not likely that two Republicans will survive the primary and block a Democrat from reaching the general election. But it\u2019s a legitimate possibility \u2014 and not worth the risk for the Democratic Party.<\/p>\n \u201cHow unlikely does it have to be for Democrats not to be worried?\u201d asks Mitchell, who works primarily for Democrats. \u201cEven if the chances are very small, the consequences could be catastrophic.\u201d<\/p>\n He is constantly running primary election simulations. And last week he calculated the chances of two Republicans gaining the top slots at 18%. Most of his calculations have come out at around 10% to 12%, he says.<\/p>\n \u201cI\u2019m not trying to yell fire in a crowded theater,\u201d Mitchell says. \u201cBut I\u2019m trying to install a thermostat.\u201d<\/p>\n He adds: \u201cIf there was ever a perfect storm when this could happen, we\u2019re experiencing it now.\u201d<\/p>\n The absence of a gubernatorial candidate heading the Democratic ticket in November, Mitchell says, would result in party damage far beyond the governor\u2019s office.<\/p>\n It would lower Democratic voter turnout and probably cost the party congressional and legislative seats, and also affect ballot measures, Mitchell says.<\/p>\n In fact, it could jeopardize the Democrats\u2019 chances of ousting Republicans and capturing control of the U.S. House.<\/p>\n So which candidates should drop out, not only to avoid embarrassment on election night but to save the party from possible disaster?<\/p>\n Four clearly should stay.<\/p>\n Swalwell has some momentum and is the leading Democrat in most polls, although his numbers are only in the teens. He\u2019s relatively young at 45 and many voters are looking for generational change.<\/p>\n Porter is the leading female \u2014 with a chance to become the first woman elected California governor \u2014 and has been holding up in the polls despite showing a bad temper in a damaging TV interview last year.<\/p>\n Steyer has loads of his own money to spend on TV ads. But he needs a more coherent, simple message in the spots.<\/p>\n San Jose Mayor Matt Mahan just entered the race, but shows some promise. He\u2019s a moderate with strong Silicon Valley tech support. And he also has youth at 43.<\/p>\n Five others should consider bowing out.<\/p>\n Xavier Becerra has a great resume: Former U.S. health secretary, former California attorney general and longtime congressman. But he hasn\u2019t shown much fire. And his message is muted.<\/p>\n Antonio Villaraigosa also has an impressive resume: Former Los Angeles mayor and state Assembly speaker. He\u2019s running with a strong centrist message. But at 73, voters seem to feel his time is past.<\/p>\n Former state Controller Betty Yee knows every inch of state government, but lacks voter appeal.<\/p>\n State Supt. of Public Instruction Tony Thurmond hasn\u2019t shined in his current job and has no traction in the governor\u2019s race.<\/p>\n Former legislator Ian Calderon isn\u2019t even a blip.<\/p>\n What causes some candidates to stay in a race against long, even impossible odds?<\/p>\n \u201cHope springs eternal,\u201d says longtime Democratic strategist Darry Sragow. \u201cHistory is replete with races that turned around on a dime.\u201d<\/p>\n And many feel obligated to their donors and endorsers, he adds.<\/p>\n Also, consultants often \u201chave a vested interest\u201d financially in keeping their clients in the game, he acknowledges.<\/p>\n But currently, Sragow adds, \u201cit\u2019s time for the Democratic Party to get its act together and weed out the field.\u201d<\/p>\n \u201cParty leaders should start cracking the whip. There\u2019s something to be said for decisions being made behind closed doors in a \u2018smoke filled room.\u2019 The difference today is that it\u2019s in a smoke-free room.\u201d<\/p>\n The filing deadline for officially becoming a candidate is March 6. After that, a name cannot be removed from the ballot. It\u2019s stuck there \u2014 possibly drawing just enough votes to rob another Democrat of the chance to be elected governor in November.<\/p>\n What else you should be reading<\/p>\n The must-read: Bernie Sanders kicks off billionaires tax campaign with choice words for the \u2018oligarchs\u2019<\/a> Until next week,
What the … : Bondi claims win in ICE mask ban fight \u2014 but court ruled on different California case<\/a>
The L.A. Times Special: Billionaires Spielberg, Zuckerberg eyeing East Coast, stirring concerns about California\u2019s wealth-tax proposal<\/a> <\/p>\n
George Skelton<\/p>\n