<\/p>\n
President Donald Trump answers questions during a press briefing held at the White House February 20, 2026 in Washington, D.C., after the Supreme Court ruled against his use of emergency powers to implement international trade tariffs. <\/p>\n
Aaron Schwartz<\/p>\n
Getty Images<\/p>\n
On Saturday, President Donald Trump announced his plan to increase the temporary global tariff, known as Section 122 tariffs, from 10% to 15%, as he continues to push back against the Supreme Court decision that struck down his \u201creciprocal\u201d duties on imports.<\/p>\n
For California\u2019s clean energy sector, this means largely reverting to the status quo ante \u2014 restoring a broad, blanket tariffs layer on top of the steep, targeted duties that have already been driving up the cost of solar panels, metals and other equipment, according to an expert.<\/p>\n
\u201cThe new proposal to replace the IEEPA tariffs would just be a similar level of tariff across the board, on all products,\u201d said Michael Davison, an associate professor in the School of Global Policy and Strategy at UC San Diego, adding \u201cit would have the same effect as the prior tariffs.\u201d<\/p>\n
Under Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974, temporary import duties are capped at 15% and can run for up to 150 days, unless Congress votes to keep them in place for another 150 days.<\/p>\n
Last week\u2019s Supreme Court ruling opened the door to slightly cheaper solar projects<\/a> nationally and, in theory, marginally lower power bills for Californians \u2014 but only if the tariffs stay off the books for years, allowing those small savings to build up across a decade of new projects.<\/p>\n But with Trump\u2019s new global tariffs announcement, that door appears to have slammed shut almost as quickly as it opened.<\/p>\n \u201cThe Supreme Court\u2019s disappointing decision today will not deter the President\u2019s effort to reshape the long-distorted global trading system that has undermined the economic and national security of our country, and contributed to fundamental international payment problems,\u201d the White House said in a statement<\/a> hours after the Supreme Court\u2019s ruling last week.<\/p>\n Davidson said the most influential tariffs affecting the solar industry include Section 201 safeguard tariffs on solar imports, Section 301 tariffs on Chinese goods, Section 232 tariffs on steel, aluminum, and copper, as well as anti-dumping and countervailing duties on solar components.<\/p>\n Davidson\u2019s point was echoed by Andrew Campbell, executive director of UC Berkeley\u2019s Energy Institute at Haas, who said Friday that although the broad blanket tariffs are not the main driver behind Californians\u2019 energy bills, they have still been a \u201csignificant factor\u201d pushing up the cost of large\u2011scale clean energy projects in the state.<\/p>\n California\u2019s ambitious low carbon goals, like reaching statewide carbon neutrality by 2045 and cutting greenhouse gas emissions 40% below 1990 levels by 2030, hinge on deploying large amounts of solar panels, battery storage, electric vehicles and expanded transmission, Davidson said.<\/p>\n Raising the costs of that equipment and infrastructure \u201cis going to make those projects more difficult to stand up,\u201d he continued.<\/p>\n Meanwhile, Gov. Gavin Newsom welcomed the court\u2019s ruling<\/a>, urging Trump to \u201ccough up\u201d the money \u201cunlawfully taken\u201d since the tariffs were imposed.<\/p>\n \u201cTime to pay the piper, Donald. These tariffs were nothing more than an illegal cash grab that drove up prices and hurt working families, so you could wreck longstanding alliances and extort them,\u201d Newsom said Friday. \u201cEvery dollar unlawfully taken must be refunded immediately \u2014 with interest. Cough up!\u201d<\/p>\n Related Stories from Sacramento Bee<\/p>\n
![\"Profile](\"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/Chaewon-Chung.jpg\")