But all three candidates at Thursday\u2019s debate have the same position on the Great Highway: They want it back open to cars.\u00a0<\/p>\n
Yet, the forum at the United Irish Cultural Center became heated as Supervisor Alan Wong, who led an effort for a ballot measure to bring cars back to the Great Highway but failed to secure enough signatures<\/a> from his colleagues, blamed rival Natalie Gee for kneecapping him. District 10 Supervisor Shamann Walton, Gee\u2019s boss, was one of eight supervisors who did not sign on.\u00a0<\/p>\n \u201cNatalie Gee and her boss sabotaged my legislation through their own political ambitions,\u201d Wong said on Thursday night. \u201cDo we have to bend our knees and kiss the ring in order to get you to support something that you already publicly claim to support?\u201d\u00a0<\/p>\n In a rebuttal, Gee countered Wong\u2019s account, saying Wong never talked to Walton in person about the legislation, even though their offices are across the hall from each other. \u201cSo instead of blaming it on me, make sure you take accountability for things you didn\u2019t do.\u201d<\/p>\n Wong, raising his voice, reiterated that he called Walton on the phone and that the eight-page legislation was simple to understand. \u201cClearly, somebody\u2019s not listening to the neighborhood and supporting the reopening of the Great Highway.\u201d\u00a0<\/p>\n Albert Chow, another candidate, who is a hardware store owner and organizer of the Joel Engardio recall, was also given an opportunity to weigh in. After a pause, he blurted out \u201cI\u2019m good,\u201d breaking the tension in the room. The crowd laughed. Gee gave Chow a fist bump.\u00a0<\/p>\n Some 60 people, mostly familiar faces involved in Sunset politics, gathered for the first public District 4 candidate forum, hosted by the public pressure group ConnectedSF and Sunset United Neighbors. It was moderated by Tara Moriarty, a spokesperson for the sheriff\u2019s department and former KTVU reporter.<\/p>\n The 80-minute forum only featured three out of five candidates who filed to run \u2014 David Lee and Jeremy Greco<\/a> were not invited. The organizers pointed to the time limit and a survey sent out to their members, which indicated that less than 2 percent of them were interested to hear more about Lee and Greco.\u00a0<\/p>\n Another inevitable topic of discussion was the city\u2019s upzoning plan<\/a>, a key issue<\/a> during the recall of Engardio and during Mayor Daniel Lurie\u2019s lengthy appointment process to name Engardio\u2019s successors<\/a>, plural<\/a>.\u00a0<\/p>\n Gee and Chow both opposed the upzoning plan<\/a>, and said during Lurie\u2019s appointment process<\/a>, they made clear that they would vote no on it.\u00a0<\/p>\n But Wong voted for it, and Gee took a jab at the new supervisor: \u201cI\u2019m not going to get appointed to something and vote yes on that the second day.\u201d\u00a0<\/p>\n Wong, who voted for the plan a day after he was appointed by Lurie, said he understood neighbors who want to be in a \u201csafe and quiet neighborhood\u201d with lower density. But he supported the plan because \u201cthat is a pragmatic and responsible approach to maintain local control,\u201d echoing Lurie\u2019s pitch for the upzoning plan<\/a>.\u00a0<\/p>\n For Heather Davis, a lead volunteer of the Engardio recall, who strongly opposes the upzoning plan, this made all the difference.\u00a0<\/p>\n Twenty minutes before the forum, Davis held a hand-made sign reading \u201crank choice\u201d outside the venue.\u00a0<\/p>\n No. 1 choice, Albert or Natalie.\u00a0<\/p>\n No. 2 choice, Natalie or Albert.\u00a0<\/p>\n No. 3 and No. 4, no one.\u00a0<\/p>\n While campaigns say there is no ranked-choice alliance formed just yet, Chow and Gee\u2019s campaign staffers and supporters were friendly, gathering outside the venue minutes before the event, taking pictures for each other and at times with each other, signs mixed.\u00a0<\/p>\n Candidates also discussed other topics, like transit \u2014 both Chow and Wong support bringing cars back on Market Street<\/a> \u2014 waste and fraud in government, and the city\u2019s budget crisis.\u00a0<\/p>\n Facing a two-year budget deficit of nearly $1 billion, Moriarty asked, what services will they cut and what will they keep?\u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n All said they would consolidate duplicate or unnecessary services and contracts.<\/p>\n Gee said the city should make sure the city doesn\u2019t outsource services, but keep work within the city employees as much as possible, a demand that labor unions such as SEIU 1021 \u2014 a Gee backer \u2014 have advocated<\/a> in recent years.\u00a0<\/p>\n Gee also said the city needs to fully staff the police department, so that it doesn\u2019t need to pay tens of millions in police overtime<\/a>. Gee was on thin ice with the San Francisco police union, which wrote a letter to Lurie in November against appointing Gee as the District 4 supervisor, citing her 2024 questionnaire response supporting weakening the police union.\u00a0<\/p>\n The police union has endorsed Wong (who in 2020 wrote in a questionnaire <\/a>that he supported reducing the SFPD budget by 25 percent).<\/p>\n The controllers office should conduct reviews and set benchmarks to cut out ineffective programs, Wong said. He would also cut executive management positions \u2014 managers who \u201cmake twice the rate of frontline workers,\u201d \u2014 as well as \u201celiminate inherent corruption in the bureaucracy.\u201d\u00a0<\/p>\n![\"A](\"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/district4-debate-1-853x640.jpg\")
Some 60 people gather at the United Irish Cultural Center for the first public District 4 candidates forum on Feb. 26, 2026. Photo by Junyao Yang. <\/p>\n![\"A](\"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/district4-debate-2-853x640.jpg\")
Heather Davis holds a handmade sign showing her preferred ranked-choice voting strategy for the District 4 race on Feb. 26, 2026. Photo by Junyao Yang. <\/p>\n![\"A](\"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/district4-debate-3-853x640.jpg\")
District 4 candidates pose for a group photo, next to leader of the Sunset United Neighbors Selena Chu and moderator Tara Moriarty after the forum on Feb. 26, 2026. Photo by Junyao Yang. <\/p>\n