{"id":246743,"date":"2026-04-01T14:21:14","date_gmt":"2026-04-01T14:21:14","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/246743\/"},"modified":"2026-04-01T14:21:14","modified_gmt":"2026-04-01T14:21:14","slug":"oakland-pushes-for-bigger-slice-of-measure-w-funds-amid-countywide-tensions","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/246743\/","title":{"rendered":"Oakland Pushes for Bigger Slice of Measure W Funds Amid Countywide Tensions"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"\"<\/a>Vol. VI, No. 1,233<\/p>\n

\u2014Oakland is urging for Alameda County to allot them a greater percentage of Measure W funding for affordable housing and homelessness. <\/p>\n

Oakland is already set to receive 58 percent of the Measure W half-cent sales tax revenue estimated to be $1.8 billion in total new funding through 2031.<\/p>\n

Measure W allocation approved by the Board of Supervisors last fall:<\/p>\n

Oakland\/Piedmont 58.07%<\/p>\n

Mid-County 16.35%<\/p>\n

South County 11.36%<\/p>\n

North County 10.28%<\/p>\n

East County 3.94%<\/p>\n

Oakland officials are now proposing a revised formula that would increase their share by 4.66 percent. The proposal is based on the number of homeless individuals identified in the most recent point-in-time count, along with a \u201cBlack Homelessness Equity Adjustment.\u201d<\/p>\n

Proposed re-allocation:<\/p>\n

Oakland\/Piedmont 62.72% (+4.66%)<\/p>\n

Mid-County 14.42% (-1.93%)<\/p>\n

North County 10.03% (-0.26%)<\/p>\n

South County 9.68% (-1.68%)<\/p>\n

East County 3.15% (-0.79%)<\/p>\n

Debate over how to divide an initial $800 million tranche of Measure W funding last year proved divisive across the county, with many cities pushing for larger shares while privately expressing frustration that Oakland receives more than half of the total.<\/p>\n

To avoid reigniting those regional tensions, the county is now considering a third option that would still increase Oakland\u2019s share, but to a lesser degree\u201461.76 percent.<\/p>\n

It\u2019s important to note that Measure W funds are not distributed directly to cities. Instead, allocations are made by percentage to nonprofit organizations that apply for and receive funding to provide services within each jurisdiction.<\/p>\n

Share East Bay Insiders Newsletter<\/a><\/p>\n

Refer a friend<\/a><\/p>\n

\u2014More inside:<\/p>\n

\ud83c\udf99\ufe0fAFTER HOURS: New East Bay Insiders Podcast Extra: Alameda County DA\u2019s race, Pamela Price, ballot statement snafu in a 15 minute bite.<\/p>\n

CITY NEWS: San Francisco police officers got a new deal. Oakland is next at the bargaining table.<\/p>\n

ELECTION 2026: Judicial candidates break tradition, weigh in on politics in Alameda County Superior Court races.<\/p>\n

Swalwell files cease and desist letter to stop release of FBI\u2019s Fang Fang files.<\/p>\n

Early oppo drop targets Agarwal as Khanna CA17 primary heats up.<\/p>\n

Alameda County Republican Party\u2019s choice for governor: Hilton or Bianco?<\/p>\n

CAMPAIGN FINANCE: IE backing Oakland\u2019s parcel tax measure gets $70k boost. Form 497 large campaign contributions filed on March 31.<\/p>\n

\u2014EPISODE 127\u2014A fast-moving look at California\u2019s governor\u2019s race, including questions around Eric Swalwell\u2019s lack of scrutiny and whether Matt Mahan\u2019s big spending is falling flat\u2014plus early predictions. Plus, segments on Oakland, the FBI, and San Leandro\u2019s newest councilmember.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Vol. VI, No. 1,233 \u2014Oakland is urging for Alameda County to allot them a greater percentage of Measure…\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":246744,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[34],"tags":[143,145,144],"class_list":["post-246743","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-oakland","tag-oakland","tag-oakland-headlines","tag-oakland-news"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/246743","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=246743"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/246743\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/246744"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=246743"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=246743"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=246743"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}