WASHINGTON\u00a0\u2014\u00a0President Trump signaled Wednesday that the United States is eyeing an offramp in its war with Iran, as he also raised the possibility of a major shift in U.S. alliances, including the potential withdrawal from NATO. <\/p>\n
Trump indicated in a social media post that Iran\u2019s president wanted a ceasefire, and that the United States would be open to doing so, if Iran agrees to reopen the Strait of Hormuz, a vital oil shipping route that has been affected during the monthlong conflict.<\/p>\n
\u201cUntil then, we are blasting Iran into oblivion or, as they say, back to the Stone Ages<\/a>!!!\u201d Trump wrote. <\/p>\n The remarks appeared to outline a possible diplomatic opening with Tehran, but hours later Iranian officials said that Trump\u2019s claims about being close to a deal were \u201cfalse and baseless\u201d and that the waterway remained \u201cfirmly and decisively under the control\u201d of the Islamic Republic\u2019s forces.<\/p>\n \u201cThe strait will not be opened to the enemies of this nation through the ridiculous spectacle by the president of the United States,\u201d the paramilitary Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps wrote in a statement.<\/a> <\/p>\n Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian on Wednesday also wrote a public letter denouncing what he described as a \u201cflood of distortions and manufactured narratives\u201d about the war from the U.S., arguing that Iran is not a threat and had only defended itself against American aggression.<\/p>\n He called on the American people to \u201clook beyond the machinery of disinformation\u201d to reach their own conclusions about the war and its purpose.<\/p>\n \u201cIs \u2018America First\u2019 truly among the priorities of the U.S. government today?\u201d he wrote, echoing recent complaints from Trump\u2019s own base about the president\u2019s commitments to his campaign promises.<\/p>\n The dueling messages underscored the uncertainty about how much longer the conflict in the Middle East will last and whether the United States will be able to achieve its main goal of preventing Iran from ever producing a nuclear weapon.<\/p>\n Trump, who on Tuesday said he expects the U.S. will leave Iran within three weeks<\/a>, was poised to address the nation Wednesday night about the war. The White House said the president\u2019s address would formally outline the objectives of Operation Epic Fury, whose mission has at times been convoluted even as Trump administration officials maintain their explanations for waging the war have been \u201cclear and unchanging.\u201d<\/p>\n White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt announced Trump\u2019s speech late Tuesday, after Trump downplayed remarks made by Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth about Iran\u2019s lingering military capabilities. <\/p>\n In the lead-up to those remarks, Trump told Reuters that he was looking to pull American forces from the region \u201cquickly\u201d with the possibility of returning to Iran periodically for \u201cspot hits\u201d when necessary.<\/p>\n The president, who said he believed the U.S. military is close to ensuring Iran loses its ability to possess a nuclear weapon in the future, did not seem too worried about Iran having highly enriched uranium in its stockpiles. <\/p>\n \u201cThat\u2019s so far underground, I don\u2019t care about that,\u201d he told Reuters, adding that the U.S. military will be \u201cwatching it by satellite.\u201d<\/p>\n Trump, however, remained focused on having Iran reopen the Strait of Hormuz, an oil route through which a fifth of the world\u2019s oil flows. <\/p>\n He said this week that he may pull American forces from the region and leave other countries to deal with the hurdles of reopening the waterway. But on Wednesday, he seemed to walk back that stance, and said a key part of the ongoing negotiations hinged on Iran ending the de facto blockade on the strait.<\/p>\n It remains unclear whether Israel, which began bombing Iran alongside the U.S. on Feb. 28, would agree to the same terms as Trump and stop hostilities against Iran. <\/p>\n Talks about the potential end of the conflict led stocks to rise Tuesday, but it remains unclear whether higher food prices could persist for months or longer. It is also uncertain when U.S. gas prices \u2014 which jumped past an average of $4 a gallon this week for the time since 2022 \u2014 would go lower.<\/p>\n NATO becomes a factor in the war<\/p>\n As Trump considers pulling out of Iran, he is also weighing a withdrawal from NATO, telling Reuters that the alliance\u2019s lack of support during the war has him \u201cabsolutely\u201d considering withdrawing from the security alliance, which was ratified by the Senate in 1949.<\/p>\n In an interview with Fox News on Tuesday night, Secretary of State Marco Rubio said the U.S. is planning to \u201creexamine\u201d its relationship with NATO and whether it makes sense to be part of a \u201cone-way-street\u201d alliance.<\/p>\n \u201cWhy are we in NATO?\u201d Rubio said. \u201cWhy do we send trillions of dollars and have all of these Americans stationed in the region, if in our time of need, we are not going to be allowed to use those bases?\u201d <\/p>\n Rubio\u2019s comment marks a notable evolution from his position in Congress. As senator in 2023, Rubio helped spearhead legislation that said the president \u201cshall not suspend, terminate, denounce, or withdraw the United States\u201d from NATO unless the Senate agrees by a two-thirds vote to do so. <\/p>\n On Wednesday, Rubio told CBS that he maintains Congress should play a role on whether the U.S. should withdraw from NATO. He added that he does not believe Trump \u201cwill remove us from NATO,\u201d but he does believe he will demand that NATO allies \u201cdo more.\u201d<\/p>\n In a joint statement Wednesday, Sens. Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) and Chris Coons (D-Del.) said the United States will remain in the treaty and that the Senate \u201cwill continue to support the alliance for the peace and protection it provides America, Europe and the World.\u201d<\/p>\n Although Trump has previously threatened to end U.S. membership in NATO, his most recent remarks have put added pressure on European allies to revisit the terms of their relationship. <\/p>\n In a post on X, Finnish President Alexander Stubb said he had a \u201cconstructive discussion\u201d with Trump on Wednesday about NATO.<\/p>\n \u201cProblems are there to be resolved, pragmatically,\u201d Stubb wrote.<\/a> <\/p>\n Their conversation came after Trump and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth complained that European countries have been hesitant to help the U.S. in its war against Iran. Just this week, Italy <\/a>and Spain<\/a> refused to allow U.S. warplanes from landing at their military bases before flying to the Middle East.<\/p>\n Britain\u2019s prime minister, Keir Starmer, defended NATO on Wednesday, saying it was the \u201csingle most effective military alliance the world has ever seen\u201d and, more broadly, said he would not cave to pressure to join the Iran war.<\/p>\n \u201cWhatever the pressure on me and others, whatever the noise, I\u2019m going to act in the British national interest in all the decisions that I make,\u201d Starmer told reporters.<\/a> \u201cThat\u2019s why I\u2019ve been absolutely clear that this is not our war, and we\u2019re not going to get dragged into it.\u201d<\/p>\n As diplomatic efforts continue, the Trump administration has increased its military presence in the Middle East, with thousands of U.S. troops arriving in the region as ground operations in the war remain an option. <\/p>\n The U.S. military buildup in the Mideast came as fighting continued to escalate in the Persian Gulf region on Wednesday.<\/p>\n Iran hit an oil tanker off Qatar\u2019s coast, prompting the evacuation of 21 crew members. In Bahrain, there were alerts for incoming missiles, while Kuwait\u2019s state-run news agency KUNA reported that a drone hit a fuel tank at Kuwait International Airport. Meanwhile, Jordan\u2019s military intercepted a ballistic missile and two drones fired by Iran, and an airstrike in Tehran appeared to have hit the former U.S. Embassy compound.<\/p>\n Additionally, Israeli strikes killed at least five people on a Beirut neighborhood. Israel invaded southern Lebanon in March after the Iran-linked militant group Hezbollah began launching missiles into northern Israel. <\/p>\n This article includes reporting from the Associated Press.<\/p>\n