{"id":264324,"date":"2026-04-12T18:52:10","date_gmt":"2026-04-12T18:52:10","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/264324\/"},"modified":"2026-04-12T18:52:10","modified_gmt":"2026-04-12T18:52:10","slug":"san-diego-federal-judge-who-struck-down-many-state-gun-laws-retires","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/264324\/","title":{"rendered":"San Diego federal judge who struck down many state gun laws retires"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>U.S. District Judge Roger Benitez, who drew <a href=\"https:\/\/www.sandiegouniontribune.com\/2021\/08\/08\/this-san-diego-judge-is-upending-state-gun-laws-blessed-jurist-or-stone-cold-ideologue\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener nofollow\">both criticism and adoration<\/a> for frequently striking down California\u2019s gun laws, has retired after nearly 22 years.<\/p>\n<p>Benitez, 75, retired April 2, attributing the decision to his age, health and desire to spend more time with his children and grandchildren. He is now working as an arbiter and mediator for ADR Services.<\/p>\n<p>Nominated to the lifetime position by President George W. Bush, Benitez had served as a district judge since 2004, and before that as a U.S. magistrate judge in El Centro beginning in 2001. He went on semi-retired senior status and began taking a lighter caseload at the end of 2017.<\/p>\n<p>It was while on senior status that Benitez rose to prominence, mostly for his gun-friendly rulings in Second Amendment cases that transformed the Southern District of California into a <a href=\"https:\/\/www.sandiegouniontribune.com\/2023\/03\/06\/san-diego-to-take-spotlight-in-fight-over-californias-gun-laws-history-will-be-key\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener nofollow\">favorite venue for gun-rights groups<\/a> to challenge state weapons laws. He also drew a <a href=\"https:\/\/www.sandiegouniontribune.com\/2024\/05\/01\/9th-circuit-reprimands-san-diego-federal-judge-for-misconduct-in-handcuffing-of-defendants-teen-daughter\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener nofollow\">rare judicial reprimand<\/a> in 2024 for ordering a defendant\u2019s teenage daughter to be handcuffed in his San Diego courtroom in an attempt to scare her straight.<\/p>\n<p>His Second Amendment rulings \u2014 such as one that <a href=\"https:\/\/www.sandiegouniontribune.com\/2021\/06\/05\/san-diego-federal-judge-wipes-out-a-key-pillar-of-state-gun-regulations-again\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener nofollow\">struck down California\u2019s longstanding ban on assault weapons<\/a>, in which Benitez compared the AR-15 rifle to a Swiss Army knife \u2014 drew the ire of those seeking to limit gun violence through legislation. That <a href=\"https:\/\/www.sandiegouniontribune.com\/2023\/02\/26\/newsoms-criticisms-of-judges-dont-earn-same-scolding-as-trumps\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener nofollow\">included Gov. Gavin Newsom<\/a>, who once called Benitez a \u201cstone-cold ideologue\u201d and a \u201cwholly owned subsidiary of the gun lobby and the National Rifle Association.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Asked for his reaction to Benitez\u2019s retirement, Newsom spokesperson Diana Crofts-Pelayo said in a statement: \u201cWe hope he has the retirement he deserves.\u201d She did not elaborate when asked what kind of retirement the governor had in mind.<\/p>\n<p>The newly retired judge, who never responded publicly to the criticism during his time on the bench, laughed heartily over the phone when told of Newsom\u2019s comment, but declined to offer his own interpretation.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cI just followed the law,\u201d Benitez said of his many rulings that California\u2019s gun regulations violated the Second Amendment.<\/p>\n<p>He pointed out that on one occasion, in a Second Amendment case dealing with billy clubs, he <a href=\"https:\/\/www.sandiegouniontribune.com\/2021\/09\/22\/federal-judge-somewhat-reluctantly-upholds-california-law-banning-billy-clubs\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener nofollow\">upheld the state ban<\/a> when he believed that was the correct decision based on the Constitution and U.S. Supreme Court precedent. He later struck down the law after Supreme Court precedent changed.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cI believe that as a district judge, it is not my job to tell the Supreme Court that they\u2019re wrong, or to try to limit what the Supreme Court has said or done,\u201d Benitez said. \u201cIt\u2019s not my job. I\u2019m a district judge. I try cases. I look at the facts and make a decision based on the facts that are before me. And that\u2019s what I\u2019ve done.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Fellow retired U.S. District Judge Larry Burns said Benitez handled the criticism the right way.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cHe kept quiet, except among friends. He didn\u2019t take the bait,\u201d Burns said. \u201cHe handled those many criticisms with aplomb and dignity.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>On the other side of the criticism, Benitez was hailed as a hero and patriot by California gun enthusiasts, who nicknamed him \u201cSt. Benitez.\u201d His likeness, complete with robes and a halo, and sometimes holding an AR-15 or a box of bullets, could be found on T-shirts, prayer candles, gun magazines and other items.<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\" lazyautosizes lazyload\" alt=\"Prayer candles available online contain an image of federal Judge Roger T. Benitez as a haloed &quot;St. Benitez,&quot; holding an AR-15. (Al Seib\/Los Angeles Times\/TNS)\" width=\"1600\" data- src=\"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/sut-l-benitez-retires.jpg\" data-attachment-id=\"9671100\" \/>Prayer candles available online contain an image of federal Judge Roger T. Benitez as a haloed \u201cSt. Benitez,\u201d holding an AR-15. (Al Seib\/Los Angeles Times\/TNS)<\/p>\n<p>\u201cI give the prayer candles away as Christmas presents,\u201d Chuck Michel, president of the California Rifle and Pistol Association and an attorney who argued gun cases in front of Benitez, said in an interview. \u201cHe certainly has a very high standing in the Second Amendment community for faithfully applying Supreme Court precedent.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Benitez said his wife purchased a few items featuring his saintly likeness, including a deck of cards and a T-shirt, mostly out of amusement. Benitez joked that he wished his mother \u201cwould have lived to see that her son was canonized.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>\u2018Unique view about our Constitution\u2019<\/p>\n<p>Benitez was born in 1950 in Cuba to what he described as a well-off family. Following the Cuban revolution of 1959, he and his brother were among the more than 14,000 Cuban children sent to the U.S. without their parents in Operation Peter Pan. His mother eventually came to the U.S., and the family of three ended up in El Centro.<\/p>\n<p>His experience living in Cuba in the early years of the revolution of Fidel Castro and Ernesto \u201cChe\u201d Guevara \u201cshaped my life to a great extent,\u201d Benitez said. He used to tell his law clerks that he lived in a country that restricted free speech, the free practice of religion, due process and every other constitutional amendment that makes up the U.S. Bill of Rights.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cOf course that has changed my life, which I think one would expect,\u201d Benitez said. \u201cSo I have a very unique view about our Constitution, the Bill of Rights, due process and how we should enforce those rights. It\u2019s part of who I am. I can\u2019t change that.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Burns described Benitez as the epitome of the American Dream, saying he \u201covercame\u00a0great hardships to achieve great things.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>At least some controversy has followed Benitez for most of his career on the federal bench. Following his 2003 nomination to the district court, the American Bar Association gave Benitez a rare \u201cnot qualified\u201d rating. The ABA\u2019s <a href=\"https:\/\/www.americanbar.org\/content\/dam\/aba\/administrative\/federal_judicary\/benitez.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener nofollow\">investigation<\/a> found that lawyers and judges in San Diego and Imperial counties had deep concerns about Benitez\u2019s judicial temperament and courtroom demeanor.<\/p>\n<p>An <a href=\"https:\/\/www.sandiegouniontribune.com\/2021\/08\/08\/this-san-diego-judge-is-upending-state-gun-laws-blessed-jurist-or-stone-cold-ideologue\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener nofollow\">investigation<\/a> by the Union-Tribune and Los Angeles Times in 2021 found that during a 10-year stretch during Benitez\u2019s time as a district judge, 14% of his decisions were reversed or vacated at the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, a figure that was in the upper range of other similarly situated federal judges in the Southern District at the time. Another analysis found that Benitez gave the strictest sentences of all federal judges in San Diego.<\/p>\n<p>Defense attorneys dubbed Benitez and Burns the \u201ckiller B\u2019s,\u201d according to Burns, who was also known as a harsh sentencer.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cRoger and I shared many of the same philosophies about the law, and one of those was that we believed consequences should follow for serious misconduct,\u201d Burns said.<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\" lazyautosizes lazyload\" alt=\"&quot;Saint Benitez&quot; stickers of U.S. District Judge Roger Benitez for sale at Hiram's Guns\/Firearms Unknown in El Cajon on Aug. 3, 2021. (Kristian Carreon \/ U-T file)\" width=\"2400\" data- src=\"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/sut-l-benitez-retires_fa848a.jpg\" data-attachment-id=\"9671101\" \/>\u201cSaint Benitez\u201d stickers of U.S. District Judge Roger Benitez for sale at Hiram\u2019s Guns\/Firearms Unknown in El Cajon on Aug. 3, 2021. (Kristian Carreon \/ U-T file)<\/p>\n<p>Benitez said he believes his sentences were fair, but acknowledged that his philosophy differed from some judges when it came to honoring the length of prison terms that were sometimes agreed between prosecutors and defendants.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThat\u2019s not their job, it\u2019s our job as the judges,\u201d Benitez said. \u201cIt\u2019s very easy to follow along with that kind of an agreement, but I don\u2019t think that\u2019s my job. My job is to look at the unique facts of the case, the unique facts of the defendant and the circumstances of the offense.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Benitez also acknowledged that he gave stricter sentences than other judges to drug offenders, believing longer sentences could act as a deterrent.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cI kind of think of it as a way of trying to solve a problem,\u201d he said. \u201cOn the other hand, if the circumstances don\u2019t require that I be a tough sentencer \u2026 no, I don\u2019t think I\u2019m a tough sentencer. I impose a sentence that I believe is warranted.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>One of the most controversial incidents in Benitez\u2019s career occurred in 2023 during a parole violation hearing for a defendant he\u2019d previously sentenced, when he ordered a U.S. marshal to briefly handcuff the man\u2019s 13-year-old daughter. Benitez later told a judicial panel investigating the incident that it was a teaching moment meant to scare the girl away from using drugs. It prompted a rare misconduct finding by the 9th Circuit and its 11-judge Judicial Council, which found that he \u201cengaged in abusive or harassing behavior\u201d that exceeded his authority and could have a chilling effect on the public attending court hearings.<\/p>\n<p>Benitez said during an interview last week that he couldn\u2019t discuss that incident in detail, in part because there was confidential information in the father\u2019s pre-sentence report that influenced his decision that day and that he can\u2019t disclose now.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cI did what I thought at the time was what I needed to do; the 9th Circuit did what they thought they needed to do,\u201d Benitez said. \u201cThat\u2019s all I can say.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>In general,\u00a0Benitez rejected the idea that he was a controversial figure, reiterating that he tried at all times to follow the law.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cIf someone wants to label me as controversial, fine, but the law itself, by its very nature, is controversial, right?\u201d he said. \u201cIt\u2019s adversarial. That\u2019s the whole process \u2026 I don\u2019t want to be controversial, you know? I want to be happy. I want to get along. I want to be your best friend, but my job doesn\u2019t necessarily allow me to do that.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>\u2018He\u2019ll be missed\u2019<\/p>\n<p>In his most recent high-profile and controversial set of rulings, Benitez sided with two Escondido Union School District teachers and local parents in <a href=\"https:\/\/www.sandiegouniontribune.com\/2025\/12\/23\/schools-cant-bar-teachers-from-telling-parents-if-children-are-transgender-san-diego-federal-judge-rules\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener nofollow\">ruling that parents have a constitutional right<\/a> to be informed if their child changes their gender presentation at school, and that schools can\u2019t hide that information from parents.<\/p>\n<p>The 9th Circuit issued a stay of that ruling, but the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.sandiegouniontribune.com\/2026\/03\/02\/supreme-court-sides-with-escondido-teachers-in-ongoing-lawsuit-over-transgender-student-privacy-parents-rights\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener nofollow\">Supreme Court last month reversed the stay<\/a> in a 6-3 decision and reinstated Benitez\u2019s original ruling.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cParents have a fundamental right to decide the custody, care and control of their children, including things that may affect their health and well-being,\u201d Benitez said last week of his rulings in that case. \u201cI think that parents generally love their kids. They want to do what\u2019s best for their kids. And I think that they should be given the first opportunity to make decisions about their kids. And that\u2019s not just my personal opinion, that\u2019s what the Supreme Court has said. So that\u2019s why I decided the case the way I did.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>That case, like many of his Second Amendment cases, remains under appeal. Also like the Second Amendment cases, it\u2019s likely to end up being one of the defining aspects of his legacy.<\/p>\n<p>Another part of that legacy will be the local rule change that came about from his handling of so many Second Amendment cases. Between 2019 and 2021, he struck down a state law banning gun magazines that hold more than 10 bullets, one that required background checks for ammunition purchases and the state law banning assault rifles. He was later assigned several other weapons cases and ruled in each one that the state law in question violated the Second Amendment.<\/p>\n<p>Federal court cases are assigned randomly, but a quirk in <a href=\"https:\/\/www.sandiegouniontribune.com\/2020\/10\/17\/obscure-court-rule-sends-gun-rights-cases-to-one-san-diego-federal-judge-troubling-gun-control-groups\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener nofollow\">the local court rules at the time<\/a> allowed attorneys to transfer related cases to the same judge without giving attorneys on the other side a chance to contest the transfer. The court <a href=\"https:\/\/www.sandiegouniontribune.com\/2023\/05\/15\/revised-san-diego-court-rule-addresses-quirk-that-some-said-allowed-judge-shopping-in-gun-cases\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener nofollow\">changed that rule in May 2023<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>Even so, the San Diego federal court remained a popular venue for such cases, in part on the chance that it would be randomly assigned to Benitez.<\/p>\n<p>Michel, the California Rifle and Pistol Association president, said Second Amendment advocates will now have to turn to more traditional ways of looking at venues and weighing their odds of getting a favorable judge.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThere\u2019s nothing special about the San Diego district anymore,\u201d Michel said. \u201cHe\u2019ll be missed. I wish him well, and he\u2019ll be missed.\u201d<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"U.S. District Judge Roger Benitez, who drew both criticism and adoration for frequently striking down California\u2019s gun laws,&hellip;\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":115661,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[28],"tags":[7,1312,181,23,100,74,84,76,75,1696],"class_list":{"0":"post-264324","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-san-diego","8":"tag-california","9":"tag-courts","10":"tag-latest-headlines","11":"tag-local-news","12":"tag-news","13":"tag-san-diego","14":"tag-san-diego-county","15":"tag-san-diego-headlines","16":"tag-san-diego-news","17":"tag-top-stories-sdut"},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/264324","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=264324"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/264324\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/115661"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=264324"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=264324"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=264324"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}