{"id":27147,"date":"2025-10-28T15:54:07","date_gmt":"2025-10-28T15:54:07","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/27147\/"},"modified":"2025-10-28T15:54:07","modified_gmt":"2025-10-28T15:54:07","slug":"water-rates-on-the-table-at-city-council-meeting-today","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/27147\/","title":{"rendered":"Water rates on the table at City Council meeting today"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a href=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/timesofsandiego.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/03\/Sutherland-Reservoir.jpg?ssl=1\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\"><img loading=\"lazy\" data-recalc-dims=\"1\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"640\" height=\"360\" src=\"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Sutherland-Reservoir.jpg\" alt=\"Sutherland Reservoir\" class=\"wp-image-110651\" style=\"width:811px;height:auto\"  \/><\/a>The Sutherland Reservoir in Ramona. (File photo courtesy the City of San Diego)<\/p>\n<p>Once again, the San Diego City Council will consider a steep increase of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.sandiego.gov\/blog\/peoples-business-october-27-2025\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">water and wastewater rates<\/a> \u2013 following a decision last month to punt the discussion in hopes of friendlier numbers.<\/p>\n<p>In city documents ahead of Tuesday\u2019s meeting, those changes did not appear to come about.<\/p>\n<p>The <a href=\"https:\/\/timesofsandiego.com\/politics\/2025\/10\/27\/san-diego-city-council-to-revisit-water-rate-hike-this-week\/\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">proposal<\/a> before the council is to increase water rates by 63% through 2029 and wastewater rates by 31% in the same period.<\/p>\n<p>Facing public backlash and a reluctance to raise yet another bill on city residents, the San Diego City Council voted 8-1 in late September to delay the decision on the proposal.<\/p>\n<p>Dozens of city residents balked at the rate hike \u2013 as did council members.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cI\u2019ve been talking to my constituents and they are not having this,\u201d said Councilman Stephen Whitburn. \u201cThis is a nonstarter. I want to send this back to staff and I want to see the lowest possible number.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>The justification for the increase was largely based on increasing water costs.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThe main driver of the water rate increase is higher costs to purchase water from the San Diego County Water Authority, which are passed on to the city\u2019s customers,\u201d according to city documents. \u201cPurchasing water from the SDCWA is the second largest individual expense for the entire city of San Diego.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Other reasons for the rate hike include increasing costs of maintenance, increasing energy rates, Pure Water Phase 1 operations and more.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThe city is dedicated to minimizing rate increases for its customers by focusing on long-term financial planning, making strategic infrastructure investments, securing grants and low-interest financing, and maximizing the use of local water resources,\u201d the statement said. <\/p>\n<p>\u201cHowever, despite these efforts, periodic rate adjustments are necessary to address critical challenges.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThese include replacing aging infrastructure, addressing rising costs for materials, chemicals, and energy used in the treatment and distribution of water and the collection, conveyance, and treatment of wastewater, and maintaining competitive compensation to attract and retain the skilled staff that keep our system safe and provide excellent customer service.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Councilman Kent Lee in September said the way the city was going about seeking a rate increase was \u201ceroding public trust,\u201d and he blasted Mayor Todd Gloria and his administration for \u201cnot meaningfully taking into account\u201d comments by members of the public.<\/p>\n<p>He said he was a no on water rate hikes unless the process could transparently show the need for them, but he also acknowledged the city would have to foot the bill for water from the SDCWA.<\/p>\n<p>A report released by the city\u2019s Independent Budget Analyst found that the costs were a bitter pill to swallow, but necessary medicine all the same.<\/p>\n<p>Studies prepared by the Public Utilities Department \u201cdemonstrate the need for increased revenues for both systems in order to maintain operations,\u201d the IBA report read. \u201cIn the current environment of declining water sales and wastewater flows which generate revenue for the systems, this inevitably means increasing rates.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cWithout additional revenues to support the system, PUD will need to cut expenses, either through decreased operating costs or lower spending on the Capital Improvements Program. Both of these options come with significant risks and tradeoffs that the council should be aware of prior to making their final decision.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>The proposed rate increases would go into effect in January. For a 1- inch meter, the monthly water service charge is $46.63. That would have increased to $56.83 in January 2026, $65.08 in January 2027, $72.57 in January 2028 and $80.56 per month in January 2029. Rates all rise at a similar percentage, from the smallest meter sizes (5\/8 and 3\/4 of an inch) to 16 inches.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThe need to increase rates is driven by a combination of increasing costs to both systems, combined with stagnant sales and flows that require increased costs to be supported by rate increases,\u201d the IBA report read. \u201cThe wastewater system is in a healthier position due to regular rate increases over the past four years, while the water system is in the most need of financial assistance due to increasing water purchase costs and lower financial buffers due to the lack of regular rate increases prior to 2023.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cAs discussed in this report, lower rate revenues will require reductions to operating expenditures, with the most acute impacts occurring within the Water System during FY 2026 and 2027.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>READ NEXT<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"The Sutherland Reservoir in Ramona. (File photo courtesy the City of San Diego) Once again, the San Diego&hellip;\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":27148,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[28],"tags":[3683,74,13134,76,75,11569,20584,646,20585,20586],"class_list":["post-27147","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-san-diego","tag-city-of-san-diego","tag-san-diego","tag-san-diego-city-council","tag-san-diego-headlines","tag-san-diego-news","tag-wastewater","tag-wastewater-rates","tag-water","tag-water-costs","tag-water-rates"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/27147","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=27147"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/27147\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/27148"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=27147"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=27147"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=27147"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}