![\"\"](\"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/Lucas-Giolito-Signs-Padres.jpg\")
David Frerker-Imagn Images<\/p>\n\t\t\t\tDavid Frerker-Imagn Images<\/p>\n
\u201cIt seems that the long arc of time has finally bent to my whims,\u201d said the man, sundering the veil of silence in which he had cloistered himself. The luxurious, sovereign growth around his mouth stirred and parted once more as its owner granted himself a fleeting moment of almost rapturous satisfaction. \u201cThose worthy of my ambitions have finally revealed themselves, and now I am compelled to do naught but grind the ambitions of my enemies into pale dust,\u201d he intoned to the unadorned darkness, steepling his fingers in sacerdotal triumph.<\/p>\n
At least, that\u2019s what happened in the disordered mind of Dan Szymborski, curious for months where Lucas Giolito<\/a> would end up in 2026. Since the end of the offseason, with Giolito unsigned, he\u2019s been a source of speculation as the grand Plan B whenever a pitcher has been lost to injury, almost as if he were lying in wait. The rumors finally materialized into fact on Wednesday, as the San Diego Padres signed him to a one-year deal with a mutual option for the 2027 season.<\/p>\n If Giolito had been waiting for a perfect fit, the team with which he\u2019d make the biggest impact, he was correct to join the Padres. In fact, given the rumors that had popped up, I had already started writing a slightly different piece before reality quite rudely interfered; in it, I used ZiPS to estimate his effect on the playoff probabilities for each team in baseball. And the Padres just happened to rank number one in ZiPS-projected Giolito impact, with their playoff probability shifting from 55% to 65% upon his acquisition, ahead of the Cubs (+8.1%), Athletics (+7.9%), Astros (+6.9%), and Braves (+6.4%), in terms of the size of the bump.<\/p>\n San Diego\u2019s rotation has been quite solid in 2026, with a 3.53 ERA in the early going, and 2.4 WAR, placing it eighth in baseball. But there were dangers that the front office could not ignore. While there\u2019s a lot more reason to be optimistic<\/a> about Randy V\u00e1squez<\/a> now that his changeup and curveball appear to have evolved into whiff machines, Nick Pivetta<\/a>\u2019s injury was still extremely unwelcome news given the team\u2019s rather thin depth. At the moment, it looks like Pivetta\u2019s flexor strain will not require season-ending surgery, but he isn\u2019t going to be back anytime soon.<\/p>\n Pivetta\u2019s injury left the Padres to fight with the Dodgers for the NL West title with an almost non-existent margin for error in their rotation. Before his injury, they were already banking on Walker Buehler<\/a>, a big enough risk that he signed with them on a minor league deal<\/a>, and Germ\u00e1n M\u00e1rquez<\/a>, who hasn\u2019t been both healthy and good since 2021. Griffin Canning<\/a> is coming back from a significant Achilles injury and hasn\u2019t pitched since June, and there\u2019s no firm timetable yet for Joe Musgrove<\/a>\u2019s return from the Tommy John surgery he had 18 months ago. Yu Darvish<\/a> is certainly not going to be back in 2026, or possibly ever. Keeping up with the Dodgers isn\u2019t an easy task, so there are only so many wins you can concede while you wait and hope for some good injury news on one of these fronts. <\/p>\n The simple truth about Giolito is that he\u2019s clearly no longer the pitcher he was when he got Cy Young votes each year from 2019 through 2021. If he were, he probably would have signed a contract north of $150 million during the offseason, instead of waiting to be a reinforcement for a contender in need. Even so, last year represented a successful comeback season for him, as he missed 2024 with internal brace surgery to repair his UCL. Giolito previously had full Tommy John surgery immediately after being drafted in the first round by the Nationals in 2012, those elbow questions being responsible for his falling to the 16th pick. <\/p>\n
1. Ad Free viewing! We won’t bug you with this ad, or any other.<\/p>\n 2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.<\/p>\n 3. Dark mode and Classic mode!<\/p>\n 4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.<\/p>\n 5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.<\/p>\n 6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn’t sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)<\/p>\n 7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.<\/p>\n 8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don’t be a victim of FOMO.<\/p>\n 9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.<\/p>\n 10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!<\/p>\n
It\u2019s true that last season was a successful return for Giolito, but there are some important caveats to that statement. His 3.41 ERA in 26 starts was certainly solid, but dark things lurked in his peripheral numbers. His FIP was a more middling 4.17, and his 7.5 K\/9 represented a 20% drop-off from his 2022-2023 numbers and a third off his peak. Statcast\u2019s xERA was especially negative, giving him a 5.01 for 2025, and though the ZiPS version was kinder, the zERA of 4.55 was hardly top-free-agent material. The goal here isn\u2019t to add an ace \u2014 though I can\u2019t imagine San Diego would object if he channeled his best years \u2014 but to get an arm capable of throwing some dependably league-average innings. And I think the Padres have a good chance of getting that.<\/p>\n ZiPS Projection \u2013 Lucas Giolito<\/p>\n Year 2026 2027
\n You Aren’t a FanGraphs Member
\n <\/p>\n
\n It looks like you aren’t yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren’t logged in). We aren’t mad, just disappointed.
\n <\/p>\n
\n We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we’d like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
\n <\/p>\n
\n We hope you’ll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we’ve also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn’t want to overdo it.
\n <\/p>\n
\nW
\nL
\nS
\nERA
\nG
\nGS
\nIP
\nH
\nER
\nHR
\nBB
\nSO
\nERA+
\nWAR<\/p>\n
\n7
\n7
\n0
\n4.31
\n26
\n26
\n137.7
\n134
\n66
\n20
\n53
\n124
\n95
\n1.5<\/p>\n
\n5
\n6
\n0
\n4.39
\n22
\n22
\n110.7
\n107
\n54
\n16
\n42
\n98
\n93
\n1.1<\/p>\n