\n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe Sacramento City Council on Tuesday voted 9-0 to deny an appeal from residents opposed to a proposed six-story apartment complex in East Sacramento.The residents argued the project is too large for the neighborhood, which council members rejected. (Previous coverage in the video above.)The development is planned for Alhambra Boulevard between C and D streets and would bring 332 market-rate apartment units to the area. It would replace the former Mary Ann\u2019s Bakery warehouses and several vacant homes on a block that has sat largely empty for years.The Sacramento Planning and Design Commission approved the project in February, saying it would add much-needed housing. But two separate groups appealed that decision to the city council, arguing the building is too tall and incompatible with the surrounding neighborhood.Residents who live nearby said they were not opposed to development on the site. Instead, they say they wanted a project that better matches the scale and character of East Sacramento.\u201cWe would love to see something go in on that corner. It\u2019s been empty, and it\u2019s an eyesore,\u201d said Anne Davis, a longtime East Sacramento resident.Still, neighbors said the current proposal would bring significant changes to an area made up mostly of single-family homes.\u201cIt would just be a really big change for this neighborhood,\u201d said Erin O\u2019Leary, who lives nearby. \u201cThere\u2019s already a lot of traffic coming through here. It\u2019s difficult to find parking sometimes.\u201dOpponents of the project said their concerns include increased traffic, limited parking, privacy, and the overall fit of a six-story building in the neighborhood. Some said they would support a smaller project instead.\u201cIt\u2019s going to impact the lighting. You\u2019re going to be able to see in my backyard from the top of that building,\u201d Davis said. \u201cI would be happy to have a three- or a four-story building go up.\u201dWendy Langsdon, another nearby resident, said she would welcome redevelopment if it were scaled back.\u201cI would love to see something beautifully developed here,\u201d Langsdon said. \u201cBut not six stories.\u201dSome neighbors took formal steps to challenge the approval.\u201cWe did get someone that did hire an attorney that\u2019s helping us out, and we\u2019re very grateful for that because, you know, it\u2019s just the wrong thing,\u201d said Susan Z’berg, a nearby resident involved in the appeal effort.When the project was approved earlier this year, commissioners said state housing laws limited their ability to reject qualifying developments.\u201cThere are some rules that are in place at the state level now, between SB 330 and the Housing Accountability Act, that really do effectively limit the discretion of this commission to say no to housing projects,\u201d Planning Commissioner Dov Kadin said during the February meeting.See more coverage of top California stories here | Download our app | Subscribe to our morning newsletter | Find us on YouTube here and subscribe to our channel –KCRA 3’s Daniel Macht contributed to this story.\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/p>\n
The Sacramento City Council on Tuesday voted 9-0 to deny an appeal from residents opposed to a proposed six-story apartment complex in East Sacramento.<\/p>\n
The residents argued the project is too large for the neighborhood, which council members rejected. <\/p>\n
(Previous coverage in the video above.)<\/p>\n
The development is planned for Alhambra Boulevard between C and D streets and would bring 332 market-rate apartment units to the area. <\/p>\n
It would replace the former Mary Ann\u2019s Bakery warehouses and several vacant homes on a block that has sat largely empty for years.<\/p>\n
The Sacramento Planning and Design Commission approved the project in February, saying it would add much-needed housing. But two separate groups appealed that decision to the city council, arguing the building is too tall and incompatible with the surrounding neighborhood.<\/p>\n
Residents who live nearby said they were not opposed to development on the site. Instead, they say they wanted a project that better matches the scale and character of East Sacramento.<\/p>\n
\u201cWe would love to see something go in on that corner. It\u2019s been empty, and it\u2019s an eyesore,\u201d said Anne Davis, a longtime East Sacramento resident.<\/p>\n
Still, neighbors said the current proposal would bring significant changes to an area made up mostly of single-family homes.<\/p>\n
\u201cIt would just be a really big change for this neighborhood,\u201d said Erin O\u2019Leary, who lives nearby. \u201cThere\u2019s already a lot of traffic coming through here. It\u2019s difficult to find parking sometimes.\u201d<\/p>\n
Opponents of the project said their concerns include increased traffic, limited parking, privacy, and the overall fit of a six-story building in the neighborhood. Some said they would support a smaller project instead.<\/p>\n
\u201cIt\u2019s going to impact the lighting. You\u2019re going to be able to see in my backyard from the top of that building,\u201d Davis said. \u201cI would be happy to have a three- or a four-story building go up.\u201d<\/p>\n
Wendy Langsdon, another nearby resident, said she would welcome redevelopment if it were scaled back.<\/p>\n
\u201cI would love to see something beautifully developed here,\u201d Langsdon said. \u201cBut not six stories.\u201d<\/p>\n
Some neighbors took formal steps to challenge the approval.<\/p>\n
\u201cWe did get someone that did hire an attorney that\u2019s helping us out, and we\u2019re very grateful for that because, you know, it\u2019s just the wrong thing,\u201d said Susan Z’berg, a nearby resident involved in the appeal effort.<\/p>\n
When the project was approved earlier this year, commissioners said state housing laws limited their ability to reject qualifying developments.<\/p>\n
\u201cThere are some rules that are in place at the state level now, between SB 330 and the Housing Accountability Act, that really do effectively limit the discretion of this commission to say no to housing projects,\u201d Planning Commissioner Dov Kadin said during the February meeting.<\/p>\n
See more coverage of top California stories here<\/a> | Download our app<\/a> | Subscribe to our morning newsletter<\/a> | Find us on YouTube here and subscribe to our channel<\/a> <\/p>\n –KCRA 3’s Daniel Macht contributed to this story. <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"The Sacramento City Council on Tuesday voted 9-0 to deny an appeal from residents opposed to a proposed…\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":287714,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[32],"tags":[123205,14852,57680,4793,599,4188,61106,1610,72608,83884,1335,276,123206,123207,13052,49348,121823,16280,290,2426,1506,288,121,15950,123,122,821,124190,72],"class_list":{"0":"post-291072","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-sacramento","8":"tag-alhambra-ave","9":"tag-andres-valle","10":"tag-appeal","11":"tag-approval","12":"tag-area","13":"tag-building","14":"tag-c-street","15":"tag-city-council","16":"tag-d-street","17":"tag-design-commission","18":"tag-development","19":"tag-east-sacramento","20":"tag-east-sacramento-neighbor","21":"tag-erin-oleary","22":"tag-february","23":"tag-housing-project","24":"tag-mckinley-park","25":"tag-neighbor","26":"tag-neighborhood","27":"tag-parking","28":"tag-project","29":"tag-resident","30":"tag-sacramento","31":"tag-sacramento-city-council","32":"tag-sacramento-headlines","33":"tag-sacramento-news","34":"tag-traffic","35":"tag-wendy-langsdon","36":"tag-year"},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/291072","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=291072"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/291072\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/287714"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=291072"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=291072"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=291072"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}