<\/p>\n
The Lawrence Hall of Science is seen March 6, 2025 in Berkeley, Calif. (Ximena Natera\/Berkeleyside via AP)<\/p>\n
Ximena Natera\/AP<\/p>\n
The National Science Foundation suspended at least 18 research grants to UC Berkeley<\/a> in April despite a court injunction restricting such suspensions, according to an attorney representing university scientists in a class action lawsuit.<\/p>\n The National Science Foundation declined to comment on the suspensions.<\/p>\n Article continues below this ad<\/p>\n The grants include at least one that the NSF had previously canceled and was compelled by a federal court order to restore, for a series of mixed-reality exhibits at the Lawrence Hall of Science showcasing Indigenous Ohlone knowledge<\/a> about the natural world, said one of the project\u2019s leaders, Jedda Foreman.<\/p>\n Foreman, an associate director at the Lawrence Hall of Science, said another researcher on her team received an email April 17 from UC Berkeley\u2019s vice chancellor of research, Katherine Yelick, notifying them that the National Science Foundation had suspended the $1.4 million grant. Foreman said she viewed the email, which said the university had received a letter from the NSF raising concerns about \u201cforeign funding.\u201d The email did not provide a copy of the letter or explain further, she said.<\/p>\n Foreman said the Lawrence Hall of Science had not received any foreign funding for the project.<\/p>\n Make SFGATE a preferred source so your search results prioritize writing by actual people, not AI.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Add Preferred Source<\/p>\n <\/a><\/p>\n \u201cThe grantees were given near-zero information about what was problematic in the execution of their grant,\u201d said Claudia Polsky, a professor at UC Berkeley School of Law who is representing Foreman and other researchers in a suit they filed last year contesting a previous round of grant cancellations by the Trump administration.<\/p>\n Article continues below this ad<\/p>\n Polsky said her legal team was seeking more information about the 18 suspensions, but was concerned that the freezing of Foreman\u2019s grant may violate a court order a federal judge issued in that case restoring the defunded projects.<\/p>\n UC Berkeley spokesperson Dan Mogulof said in a statement that the university \u201cis engaged with the government on matters pertaining to research grants, and remains committed to compliance with all federal laws, rules and regulations.\u201d<\/p>\n He declined to comment on the types of grants affected, the amount of funds at stake, or the potential impact on the campus.<\/p>\n One of the Lawrence Hall of Science exhibits, which were co-designed with Ohlone youth, is scheduled to open May 17, with another set for the fall of 2028. Researchers also are studying whether participating in creating exhibits sparks more interest in science among Indigenous young people and makes them more likely to pursue STEM careers.<\/p>\n Article continues below this ad<\/p>\n \u201cWe\u2019re doing a lot of hoping and finger-crossing that something works out,\u201d Foreman said. \u201cIt was such a powerful project and we really want to be able to share what we\u2019ve learned.\u201d<\/p>\n Trump fired the board of scientists overseeing the National Science Foundation last month<\/p>\n The University of California received $525 million in National Science Foundation grants in the 2024-25 budget year. But that funding source has become increasingly volatile under the second Trump administration as the federal agency has terminated nearly 2,000 grants nationwide<\/a> that it said did not align with its priorities \u2014 including those focusing on diversity, equity and inclusion \u2014 and has been slower to approve and disburse new awards<\/a>.<\/p>\n In late April, President Trump fired all 22 members<\/a> of the independent board of scientists that oversaw the National Science Foundation. He is also proposing to cut the agency\u2019s budget by more than half in 2027<\/a> \u2014 though Congress rejected a similar plan last year.<\/p>\n Article continues below this ad<\/p>\n Other federal agencies also terminated research grants en masse last year. Some of the cancellations have been reversed by the courts.<\/p>\n UC researchers are contesting grant reversals by the National Science Foundation, Department of Energy, National Institutes of Health, Department of Transportation, Department of Defense, Environmental Protection Agency and National Endowment for the Humanities in the class action lawsuit, filed last year. The University of California itself is not a party to the suit.<\/p>\n Last June, the researchers won a key legal victory when U.S. District Judge Rita Lin issued a preliminary injunction restoring grants canceled by the NSF, EPA and NEH<\/a> \u2014 including for the Ohlone-focused exhibits co-led by Foreman, one of six named plaintiffs in the case. The judge barred the agencies from revoking funds using form letters that didn\u2019t include an explanation specific to the grant at stake, or because of Trump\u2019s anti-DEI executive orders.<\/p>\n Judge Lin stepped in again after the NSF froze hundreds of grants to UCLA in August<\/a>, amid attempts by the Trump administration to secure a $1 billion settlement from the university over allegations of campus antisemitism. Indefinitely suspending a grant was the same as terminating it, Lin said in a ruling requiring the agency to reinstate the funds.<\/p>\n Article continues below this ad<\/p>\n Polsky said last month\u2019s suspension of Foreman\u2019s grant raised concerns that the Trump administration was seeking a way around those orders. \u201cIt seems to us like something that should not have been canceled on the merits and raises suspicion that this was just a different way to cancel the grant,\u201d she said.<\/p>\n University of California seeking $23 billion for scientific research from state<\/p>\n The University of California is ramping up efforts to find alternative funding for its multibillion-dollar research enterprise as federal support becomes less reliable. On Monday, UC President James Milliken spoke alongside state Sen. Scott Wiener and United Auto Workers president Shawn Fain at a Sacramento rally in support of state legislation to create a $23 billion fund for scientific research<\/a>.<\/p>\n If successful, the bill will place a bond measure on the November ballot. Money from the bond would go toward research in wildfire and pandemic preparedness, new medical treatments and other areas, with revenue from inventions shared with the state. The state assembly\u2019s appropriations committee is set to consider the bill May 14.<\/p>\n Article continues below this ad<\/p>\n \u201cIf the federal government is going to continue to attempt to reduce funding for the research that has been so important to UC \u2014 that saves lives, that drives the economy \u2014 then the state of California, I hope, will be able to step up,\u201d Milliken said at a meeting of the university\u2019s board of regents Wednesday.<\/p>\n UC provost Katherine Newman told the regents she has been meeting with leaders of the Russell Group, a consortium of the United Kingdom\u2019s top universities, to discuss collaborating on research in climate change, clean energy and public health \u2014 all areas that have seen federal funding threatened under the current administration.<\/p>\n Article continues below this ad<\/p>\n<\/p>\n