{"id":30927,"date":"2025-10-30T22:52:23","date_gmt":"2025-10-30T22:52:23","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/30927\/"},"modified":"2025-10-30T22:52:23","modified_gmt":"2025-10-30T22:52:23","slug":"californias-failure-to-take-repeat-drunk-drivers-off-the-road-the-press-democrat","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/30927\/","title":{"rendered":"California\u2019s failure to take repeat drunk drivers off the road \u2013 The Press Democrat"},"content":{"rendered":"

This is the third piece in CalMatters\u2019 series about how California lets dangerous drivers stay on the road. Read the first<\/a> and second<\/a> stories, as well as The Press Democrat\u2019s companion piece here<\/a>. Sign up for CalMatters\u2019 License to Kill newsletter to be notified when the next story comes out, and to get more behind-the-scenes information from CalMatters reporting.<\/p>\n

Lea el art\u00edculo en espa\u00f1ol aqu\u00ed.<\/a><\/p>\n

The state of California gave Sylvester Conway every opportunity to kill.<\/p>\n

He already had two DUI convictions by 2019, when the California Highway Patrol arrested him for driving drunk in Fresno County. The jail released him three days later. Conway didn\u2019t show up to court and a judge issued a warrant for his arrest.<\/p>\n

The cycle continued. In April 2021, prosecutors say he drove the wrong way on the highway with a blood alcohol level nearly twice the legal limit. Conway signed a citation for driving under the influence, promising that he\u2019d show up to court. He didn\u2019t.<\/p>\n

The same thing happened in August that year \u2014 another DUI arrest, this time by Fresno police, and another warrant for skipping court.<\/p>\n

All three Fresno DUI cases were still open, and all three warrants were out for Conway\u2019s arrest, when police say he sped \u2014 drunk again \u2014 on his way to a casino in February 2022. This time, he lost control, flipped his Acura and killed his passenger, Khayriyyah Jones. He\u2019s now facing murder charges in Madera County.<\/p>\n

California\u2019s DUI enforcement system is broken. The toll can be counted in bodies.<\/p>\n

Alcohol-related roadway deaths in California have shot up by more than 50% in the past decade \u2014 an increase more than twice as steep as the rest of the country, federal estimates show. More than 1,300 people die each year statewide in drunken collisions. Thousands more are injured. Again and again, repeat DUI offenders cause the crashes.<\/p>\n

To understand why so many people are dying under the wheels of drunk and drugged drivers, CalMatters reviewed<\/a> thousands of vehicular manslaughter and homicide cases prosecutors filed across the state since 2019. We also examined other states\u2019 laws on intoxicated driving and sifted through decades of state and federal traffic safety data.<\/p>\n

We found that California has some of the weakest DUI laws in the country, allowing repeat drunk and drugged drivers to stay on the road with little punishment. Here, drivers generally can\u2019t be charged with a felony until their fourth DUI within 10 years, unless they injure someone. In some states, a second DUI can be a felony.<\/p>\n

California too often fails to differentiate between drunk drivers who made a dangerous mistake but learn from it and those who refuse to stop endangering lives. It\u2019s the missed opportunities to prevent tragedies that haunt the loved ones of the dead.<\/p>\n

Sarah Villar, a pediatric physical therapist, was out walking the dog with her fiance in San Benito County when a drunk driver swerved off the road and killed her in 2021. The driver had been convicted of driving drunk in 2018, 2019 and again in 2020 \u2014 all misdemeanors \u2014 and served just a couple weeks behind bars before the fatal crash.<\/p>\n

Villar\u2019s parents buried her in her wedding dress.<\/p>\n

\u201cTo the broken justice system that allowed this to happen \u2014 shame on you,\u201d her father, Dave Villar, said in her eulogy. \u201cIf I walked out my front door today onto my porch and fired a shot into my neighborhood every day until I killed someone, when would I be a menace to society? When do I become a danger to my community? I say it\u2019s after the first shot. Our system says it\u2019s after the last.\u201d<\/p>\n

California also gives repeat drunk drivers their licenses back faster than other states. Here, you typically lose your license for three years after your third DUI, compared to eight years in New Jersey, 15 years in Nebraska and a permanent revocation in Connecticut. We found drivers with as many as six DUIs who were able to get a license in California.<\/p>\n

Many drivers stay on the road for years even when the state does take their license \u2014 racking up tickets and even additional DUIs \u2014 with few consequences until they eventually kill.<\/p>\n

When the worst does happen, there\u2019s often little punishment. Drunk vehicular manslaughter isn\u2019t considered a \u201cviolent felony.\u201d But in a twist of state law, a DUI that causes \u201cgreat bodily injury\u201d is \u2014 meaning that a drunk driver who breaks someone\u2019s leg can face more time behind bars than if they\u2019d killed them, prosecutors said.<\/p>\n

Despite the mounting death toll, state leaders have shown little willingness to address the issue. A bill proposed in the state Legislature this year would have expanded the use of in-car breathalyzers, which research shows can significantly reduce drunk driving. Most other states already require the device for first-time DUI offenders. But lawmakers killed the provision after the state\u2019s Department of Motor Vehicles said it didn\u2019t have the time or resources to carry it out.<\/p>\n

Drunk and drugged driving is now so common in car-centric California that drivers routinely rack up four, five, six DUIs. One woman in Fresno just got her 16th.<\/p>\n

The case files we reviewed are full of horrific reminders of this ubiquity. Like the story of Masako Saenz.<\/p>\n

In 2000, Saenz was driving with her 5-year-old son, Manuel, to pick up an uncle in Stockton for the family\u2019s Easter celebration when a drunk driver slammed his pickup truck into her tiny Toyota Tercel, killing the boy.<\/p>\n

The driver had been convicted of his fourth DUI two months before. He likely would have been behind bars that day, but San Joaquin Superior Court Judge John Cruikshank was letting him finish a rehab program before reporting to jail.<\/p>\n

The case made national news<\/a> when Saenz broke down during the arraignment. \u201cMurderer! Murderer! You killed my son!\u201d she screamed and had to be removed from the courtroom.<\/p>\n

She told a Sacramento Bee reporter that people would marvel at how well she seemed to be doing. \u201cBut they have no idea,\u201d she said. \u201cThey have no idea. Sometimes even now I wonder if I can go on.\u201d<\/p>\n

In the years after, her life unraveled, police and court records show. Saenz became homeless, sleeping along Sacramento roadways.<\/p>\n

She appears to have started posting to an online memorial website for her son \u2014 simple messages of love and grief sent into the void. \u201cHe will always be with me,\u201d reads the last post from January 2022.<\/p>\n

Three months later, a man with a blood alcohol level twice the legal limit \u2014 whose license was suspended after a string of speeding tickets \u2014 gunned his car, lost control and careened into her encampment just miles from the state Capitol. A witness found her body wrapped in a tent.<\/p>\n

Mother and son were killed two decades apart by drunk drivers who never should have been on the road.<\/p>\n

It doesn\u2019t have to be this way.<\/p>\n

\u2018I think it\u2019s accepted in society until the worst happens\u2019<\/p>\n

Once upon a time, California showed that you can reduce drunk driving deaths simply by trying.<\/p>\n

Two decades before Saenz\u2019s son was killed, another Sacramento mother\u2019s unfathomable loss galvanized the state and country. In 1980, Candace Lightner\u2019s 13-year-old daughter was walking to a church carnival when a drunk driver \u2014 out of jail days after what was reportedly his fourth DUI arrest \u2014 slammed into her so hard she flew out of her shoes, landing 125 feet away.<\/p>\n

In response, Lightner helped found Mothers Against Drunk Driving, ushering in the modern anti-DUI movement. California was at the forefront, forming a special task force in 1980. State leaders enacted a slate of new laws, setting a legal limit for blood alcohol content and increasing DUI penalties. In 1982, Gov. Jerry Brown touted the reforms as the \u201ctoughest package of legislation in the Nation against driving while under the influence of alcohol or drugs.\u201d<\/p>\n

In the decades that followed, California cut alcohol-related roadway fatalities by more than half.<\/p>\n

Now, the state\u2019s headed backward. And as deaths have increased, law enforcement has done less: DUI arrests statewide dropped<\/a> from nearly 200,000 in 2010 to 100,000 in 2020.<\/p>\n

The death of Masako Saenz launched no new movements. Her killing was briefly mentioned in a local news roundup of homeless deaths from 2022. But that was about it. There wasn\u2019t a picture of her on the site, just a stock photo of a burning candle \u2014 a placeholder for a life lost.<\/p>\n

The Sacramento County District Attorney\u2019s Office filed a lesser manslaughter charge against the driver, Puentis Currie Jr., instead of the more serious charge police recommended. Currie got three months behind bars, then a few months with a monitoring bracelet so he could keep going to college.<\/p>\n

Prosecutors asked Sacramento County Superior Court Judge John P. Winn to sentence Currie to at least community service instead of letting him \u201csit at home and play video games,\u201d according to a court transcript. But Winn declined, saying he was leaving the department and didn\u2019t want to saddle his replacement with decisions regarding the details of such an order.<\/p>\n

Just this past May, police caught Currie driving on a suspended license again after pulling him over for a busted headlight, court records show. That could have meant more jail time. Instead, he got a ticket.<\/p>\n

Currie said he needs to drive to and from work and was driving home from a shift when he got the recent citation. Now 25, he hopes talking about his case might keep other kids from driving while intoxicated.<\/p>\n

He said that the night that he killed Masako Saenz, he had gone out to celebrate his cousin\u2019s birthday. He did tequila shots and took ecstasy and remembers getting in the car but nothing else until after the crash.<\/p>\n

One of his attorneys told him about Saenz\u2019s son. The weight of what he\u2019d done hit him.<\/p>\n

He said he goes back to the scene of the crash every April.<\/p>\n

\u201cI put flowers there just to show, like \u2014\u201d he said, breaking down in tears, \u201cshow that I care, or show her that I\u2019m truly sorry.\u201d<\/p>\n

He said it\u2019s too easy to ignore the risk of driving under the influence. Lawyers, doctors, everyone gets DUIs.<\/p>\n

\u201cI think it\u2019s accepted in society until the worst happens,\u201d he said.<\/p>\n

\u2018It is literally just a matter of time before they kill\u2019<\/p>\n

David Alvarado already had three prior DUIs when a CHP officer saw him almost hit another car in January 2019. He admitted he\u2019d been drinking Coors Light at a friend\u2019s house.<\/p>\n

But prosecutors couldn\u2019t charge Alvarado with a felony, which typically brings with it more serious penalties and oversight. His previous DUIs \u2014 from 1997, and two from 2006 \u2014 essentially didn\u2019t count. In California, a DUI drops off your record after 10 years. He was just another misdemeanor drunk driver in a state with more than 100,000 of them that year.<\/p>\n

The Madera County District Attorney\u2019s Office hadn\u2019t even filed criminal charges yet when, 10 months later, law enforcement stopped him again for driving drunk.<\/p>\n

Over the next two years, they\u2019d pull him over twice more, citing him once for driving without a valid license and another time for drunk driving, court records show.<\/p>\n

That\u2019s three DUI arrests and a ticket in less than three years.<\/p>\n

His punishment: probation. The judge ordered him to wear an alcohol monitoring bracelet for 129 days.<\/p>\n

Less than a year after his conviction, he was driving a F-250 pickup truck when he slammed into a car stopped at a red light, killing Mary and Paul Hardin, a Texas couple visiting on a church mission trip. Prosecutors say Alvarado was drunk. He is now facing murder charges in Fresno County.<\/p>\n

Benjamin Hardin is the second oldest of the victims\u2019 11 children. He said his parents touched so many lives with their kindness and love. When the family cleaned out the couple\u2019s California apartment after the crash, he said they found a fresh baked loaf of bread with someone\u2019s name on it that their mother must have intended to deliver.<\/p>\n

\u201cI know that my parents would want me and my siblings to forgive him,\u201d Hardin said. \u201cMy parents would not want me to carry hate in my heart for him.\u201d<\/p>\n

Still, he said he was stunned to learn that someone could get that many DUIs.<\/p>\n

\u201cIt really does feel like it is literally just a matter of time before they kill someone \u2014 or in my family\u2019s case, two someones,\u201d he said.<\/p>\n

\"TheThe Victims of Drunk Drivers Memorial at Pacific View Mortuary and Memorial Park in Corona del Mar, on Sept. 24, 2025. (Jules Hotz \/ CalMatters)<\/p>\n

State data shows repeat drunk driving is not an aberration. A recent DMV analysis<\/a> tracked drivers who got a DUI in 2005. More than a quarter got another DUI over the next 15 years. Of the drivers for whom the 2005 arrest was at least their third DUI, nearly 40% went on to get yet another.<\/p>\n

San Benito District Attorney Joel Buckingham said he views a third DUI as a crucial moment to intervene, aiming for drivers to serve at least 60 days in jail to \u201creally kind of wake them up.\u201d<\/p>\n

But he also tries to take matters into his own hands at home. When he teaches his kids to drive, he tells them to \u201cassume everyone is trying to kill you,\u201d he said.<\/p>\n

It\u2019s the lack of consequences or meaningful intervention over years that make so many of the cases read like tragedy foretold.<\/p>\n

William Curtis was convicted of driving while intoxicated in May 2012.<\/p>\n

Over the next several years, he would be involved in two collisions, receive four traffic tickets and get another DUI, all while his license was supposed to be suspended, Sacramento County court records show.<\/p>\n

For the second DUI, he was sentenced to 30 days in jail. Police filed the citations in traffic court rather than sending them to the DA\u2019s office for criminal prosecution. As a result, he got off with little more than a fine for refusing to stay off the road.<\/p>\n

And he continued to drive until one night in November 2020, when he sped down Highway 99 drunk and crashed into the back of a stalled car. That vehicle burst into flames. Emergency personnel later found the charred remains of Dominique Howard trapped inside the burned vehicle.<\/p>\n

Law enforcement later let him call his mother. Court records reveal what they heard Curtis say:<\/p>\n

\u201cI killed someone. I\u2019m going away. I\u2019m sorry, mom. Tell my kids I love them.\u201d<\/p>\n

\u2018You just saved a family of four\u2019<\/p>\n

Ryan Nazaroff became a police officer because of the worst day \u2014 or maybe one of the two worst days \u2014 of his life. He was just 16 in February 2008, with a bunch of friends going from party to party on the roads that run between the farms outside Fresno. There was another car of kids in front of him, Nazaroff said.<\/p>\n

He remembers seeing the vehicle in front swerve. It hit the shoulder, overcorrected to the left and started to roll. His 14-year-old brother and another passenger were ejected.<\/p>\n

Nazaroff found his brother laying on the dirt shoulder, dead.<\/p>\n

In the horror of the moment, he remembers the polite professionalism of the CHP officers who investigated the crash. Nazaroff decided then that he wanted to do that for other people in their worst moments and try to help prevent the types of tragedies his family endured. He eventually joined the Los Angeles County Sheriff\u2019s Department.<\/p>\n

The first chance Nazaroff got as a young deputy, he took an assignment working traffic patrol on the graveyard shift, cruising alone along the dark roads of Norwalk and La Mirada, 20 miles southeast of downtown LA, looking for drunk drivers and responding to crashes. Mothers Against Drunk Driving gave him awards for his DUI arrests.<\/p>\n

\u201cYou try and remind yourself, every DUI arrest you make, you just saved a family of four,\u201d he said.<\/p>\n

\"RyanRyan Nazaroff in Rowland Heights, on Sept. 26, 2025. (Jules Hotz \/ CalMatters)<\/p>\n

Nazaroff was up for a promotion in April 2022 when he pulled into the station garage and his phone buzzed. He picked up. A Fresno County sheriff\u2019s deputy was at his mom\u2019s house.<\/p>\n

It had happened again.<\/p>\n

A drunk driver blew a stop sign and smashed into the dump truck his father was driving. Jeffrey Nazaroff was barely a block from where he was supposed to park his truck, finish his shift and go home. Instead, Ryan\u2019s dad became one of the more than 1,400 people killed in an alcohol-related crash in California that year, federal estimates<\/a> show.<\/p>\n

Ryan Nazaroff called off of work and went home. He sat up all night with his wife before driving to be with his family the next day.<\/p>\n

The woman who killed his dad was not a first-time drunk driver. Zdeineb Juarez Calderon was arrested two months before the fatal crash for allegedly driving drunk and crashing into a sign post. He thought that should be enough to charge her with murder.<\/p>\n

To sustain a murder charge, prosecutors need to be able to prove that the person knew the danger and took the risk anyway. That typically means showing the defendant received a formal warning about the dangers of intoxicated driving, called a Watson advisement. Judges will typically read a boilerplate warning into the court record when someone is convicted of a DUI or have them sign a form.<\/p>\n

But Juarez Calderon wasn\u2019t convicted of anything yet for the earlier crash, so there was no Watson warning in the court records. Prosecutors told him the best they could charge Juarez Calderon with was vehicular manslaughter, Nazaroff said.<\/p>\n

He was further frustrated to learn that because vehicular manslaughter isn\u2019t considered a \u201cviolent\u201d felony, the repeat drunk driver who killed his dad will likely serve only a small fraction of her 10-year sentence in prison.<\/p>\n

That\u2019s because the state requires people convicted of a violent felony to serve more of their time in prison. In general, someone convicted of a violent felony will serve two-thirds of their sentence behind bars while for a lesser felony it\u2019s as little as a third, said Steve Ueltzen, a Fresno County senior deputy district attorney.<\/p>\n

\u201cIt\u2019s a tough conversation to have with victims,\u201d he said.<\/p>\n

Juarez Calderon was sentenced to prison in January 2024. Records show that with the time she already spent in jail pretrial, she\u2019s eligible for release this December.<\/p>\n

\"RyanRyan Nazaroff displays childhood photos on his phone. The photo on the left shows his father, Jeffrey Nazaroff, alongside Ryan and his younger brother, Thomas Nazaroff. The photo on the right shows his father with Thomas. Rowland Heights, Sept. 26, 2025. (Jules Hotz \/ CalMatters)
\n\u2018It\u2019s an abuse of authority and power\u2019<\/p>\n

California judges and lawmakers have often refused to require one of the few technological solutions most other states use to at least try to cut down on repeat drunk drivers.<\/p>\n

Ignition interlock devices, known as IIDs, are those in-car breathalyzers that a driver needs to blow into for the vehicle to start. The technology has been around since the 1960s. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention says they can decrease repeat drunk driving offenses as much as 70% while in use. In California, the devices prevented more than 30,500 attempts to drive under the influence in 2023 alone, state legislative reports say.<\/p>\n

But unlike most states, California doesn\u2019t require first-time drunk drivers to use the devices. MADD gave us an \u201cF\u201d on a 2022 national report card of states\u2019 ignition interlock laws.<\/p>\n

More than a decade ago, state Sen. Jerry Hill tried to require the devices for all DUI offenders in honor of a friend killed by a drunk driver. The Bay Area Democrat, now retired, grew dismayed by what he deemed a \u201csoft approach\u201d to DUIs, where legislators and committee consultants worry more about inconveniencing drivers than preventing deaths.<\/p>\n

Hill ultimately had to settle for a 2016 bill that required the in-car breathalyzers for repeat DUI offenders.<\/p>\n

But records suggest even that law isn\u2019t being followed. Judges in more than a dozen counties ordered the breathalyzers for less than 10% of drivers convicted of a second DUI, according to a 2023 DMV report. In Los Angeles, judges made such orders for just 0.5% of the county\u2019s thousands of second-time DUI offenders, according to the report.<\/p>\n

\u201cThey should be ashamed of themselves, because how many deaths have they caused?\u201d Hill said. \u201cIt\u2019s an abuse of authority and power.\u201d<\/p>\n

LA County Superior Court spokesman Rob Oftring did not directly respond to detailed questions about how often the court\u2019s judges order the breathalyzers, instead saying they \u201cregularly submit abstracts of conviction\u201d to the DMV.<\/p>\n

The DMV hasn\u2019t issued new figures showing the use of the devices in more recent years. Asked for comment, the agency responded via email saying: \u201cThe DMV follows the laws established by the Legislature in the California Vehicle Code. The department operates within those laws.\u201d<\/p>\n

Even drivers who have killed someone in recent years can get on the road without the device. We identified about 130 drivers who were convicted for a fatal DUI since 2019 who have already gotten their licenses back from the state. Alcohol was a factor in the vast majority of the cases. And although some appear to have had a short requirement to use an in-car breathalyzer, fewer than 20 are currently limited to driving vehicles with an ignition interlock device installed, their DMV records show.<\/p>\n

Elias Mack thinks that\u2019s a mistake.<\/p>\n

Mack said he wasn\u2019t much of a drinker, certainly not an alcoholic, when he drove drunk in early 2023 and caused the crash that killed Aurora Morris, his high school sweetheart.<\/p>\n

\u201cI was just young,\u201d said Mack, who\u2019s now 25.<\/p>\n

He was convicted of vehicular manslaughter while intoxicated, and at his sentencing, the judge ordered Mack\u2019s license be revoked for three years. But under state law, the DMV is allowed to ignore such orders if the length of revocation is longer than what the statutes require. The agency gave Mack his license back little more than a year after his conviction and with no requirement that he install a breathalyzer, he said.<\/p>\n

\u201cI was trying to get my life back on track. I just wanted to do better and make her proud,\u201d he said, adding that he needed to drive for work.<\/p>\n

But the grief was almost too much. \u201cTo just live with that every day eats you alive,\u201d Mack said.<\/p>\n

He would often drive to see her memorial. \u201cThe only thing that\u2019s making me feel good is just going to talk to her,\u201d Mack said. But he was also drinking as a way to cope.<\/p>\n

On one of those trips, just a few months after he got his license back, police stopped him. He got another DUI.<\/p>\n

Mack said he\u2019s sober now and hopes his story can help other people. He wishes the court had ordered him to have a breathalyzer after his manslaughter conviction.<\/p>\n

It makes sense the devices would be mandatory, especially after a case like his, and for as long as possible, he added.<\/p>\n

\u201cIt\u2019s going to save somebody\u2019s life.\u201d<\/p>\n

\u2018You have an opportunity to stop this\u2019<\/p>\n

Melanie Sandoval was still a teenager in 1989 when she was convicted in Madera County for driving drunk.<\/p>\n

She got her second DUI a couple years later, and the state took her license.<\/p>\n

She got her third a few years after that. And then her fourth, fifth, sixth, seventh, eighth, ninth, 10th, 11th, 12th, 13th, 14th and 15th.<\/p>\n

It still didn\u2019t keep her from driving drunk.<\/p>\n

Kevin Bohnstedt saw the headlights coming toward him. The next thing he remembers, he was trapped in his seat with the airbags deployed and a woman outside rapping on the window.<\/p>\n

Police found a pint of vodka in Sandoval\u2019s car, said Ueltzen, who was the prosecutor in the case. It was her 16th DUI.<\/p>\n

Bohnstedt, who spent 21 years flying jets off aircraft carriers as a naval aviator, said for months afterward he\u2019d close his eyes and see the headlights coming for him. It took a while before he felt comfortable driving at night.<\/p>\n

\u201d]<\/p>\n

Sandoval pleaded no contest to felony DUI and went to rehab. At a sentencing hearing in October 2024, Ueltzen implored Superior Court Judge Charles Lee to also send Sandoval to prison.<\/p>\n

In a sharp back and forth, the judge and the prosecutor argued the weaknesses in the system.<\/p>\n

Lee noted that if he sentenced her to four years, she would be out in two at most.<\/p>\n

\u201cWhat changes? She has been to prison so many times on so many different DUIs,\u201d Lee said. \u201cWe warehouse her for a number of months. She comes out. She is still an addict. How is public safety addressed by a prison commitment here when we know she has gone to prison over and over and over again on DUIs?\u201d<\/p>\n

Ueltzen said that at least she could be forced to stay sober for a while.<\/p>\n

\u201cThe public safety is addressed by the fact that while this defendant is in the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, she is not behind the wheel of a car,\u201d he said.<\/p>\n

Lee was unmoved. For driving head on into another vehicle in what was her 16th DUI, the judge granted Sandoval probation with no additional time behind bars.<\/p>\n

Her own attorney, who asked the court to send her to rehab instead of prison, said in an interview that there was \u201cno accountability\u201d in state law for repeat DUI offenders.<\/p>\n

\u201cIf you have 16 DUIs, you likely should be doing 20 years in prison,\u201d Marc Kapetan said.<\/p>\n

Sandoval went on to violate the terms of her supervised release by showing up drunk to a probation appointment.<\/p>\n

Just this summer a different judge ordered her to serve out the remainder of her four-year sentence in prison. With credit for the time she was in rehab, plus the time she spent in jail pretrial, plus the credit the state gives you just for behaving yourself behind bars, she should be out next year.<\/p>\n

Bohnstedt said he recognizes the government can only do so much to stop people from making bad decisions and drivers have a responsibility for their own actions. But he said he was floored the court tried to let her off with mere probation and is baffled California can\u2019t either get people like Sandoval the help they need or keep them from endangering the public.<\/p>\n

\u201cThe biggest concern I have is the next time that it happens, there could be kids in the car. And she could kill them,\u201d he said. \u201cOr she could run people down. Any number of different horrific things could happen. And it could lead to somebody dying.\u201d<\/p>\n

If that happens, he said the state \u2014 lawmakers, law enforcement, the courts \u2014 will have blood on its hands.<\/p>\n

\u201cYou have an opportunity to stop this.\u201d<\/p>\n

We attempted to reach every driver named in this story or their attorneys \u2014 oftentimes both. If a person or their attorney isn\u2019t quoted, we were unable to reach them or they declined to comment.<\/p>\n

Court research by Robert Lewis, Lauren Hepler, Anat Rubin, Sergio Olmos, Cayla Mihalovich, Ese Olumhense, Ko Bragg, Andrew Donohue and Jenna Peterson.\u00a0<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"This is the third piece in CalMatters\u2019 series about how California lets dangerous drivers stay on the road.…\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":30928,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[6],"tags":[7,9,8,138,181,23,8027,3938,100,22666,993,266,22667,5556,3628],"class_list":["post-30927","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-california","tag-california","tag-california-headlines","tag-california-news","tag-crime-and-public-safety","tag-latest-headlines","tag-local-news","tag-napa","tag-napa-county","tag-news","tag-nl-napa-county","tag-north-bay","tag-northern-california","tag-petaluma","tag-santa-rosa","tag-sonoma-county"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/30927","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=30927"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/30927\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/30928"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=30927"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=30927"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=30927"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}