{"id":311440,"date":"2026-05-12T04:14:07","date_gmt":"2026-05-12T04:14:07","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/311440\/"},"modified":"2026-05-12T04:14:07","modified_gmt":"2026-05-12T04:14:07","slug":"judge-ami-sagel-for-orange-county-superior-court-office-no-41-orange-county-register","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/311440\/","title":{"rendered":"Judge Ami Sagel for Orange County Superior Court Office No. 41 \u2013 Orange County Register"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Judge Ami Sagel was appointed to the bench in 2023 and is now seeking a full-term in Orange County Superior Court Office No. 41.<\/p>\n<p>Judgeships are often uncontested and indeed many rightly wonder why judges are up for election in the first place.<\/p>\n<p>In any case, Judge Sagel has drawn a challenger and so it\u2019s up to the voters to sort out who is best suited in this judgeship.<\/p>\n<p>Prior to her appointment, Judge Sagel ran her own private practice after serving as an assistant U.S. attorney at the U.S. Attorney\u2019s Office for the Central District of California. For her work as a federal prosecutor she received an award from the FBI for \u201cExemplary Performance in the Prosecution of Crimes against Children.\u201d Before her time as a federal prosecutor, she practiced commercial litigation in New York.<\/p>\n<p>Coupled with her service as a judge, through which she now serves on the Family Law panel, it\u2019s no surprise the Orange County Bar Association <a href=\"https:\/\/www.ocbar.org\/?pg=OCBA-News-and-Announcements&amp;blAction=showEntry&amp;blogEntry=144929\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">awarded<\/a> Judge Sagel the highest rating possible: \u201cExceptionally Well Qualified.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>This rating is given to those candidates for judge who possess \u201cqualities and attributes considered to be of remarkable or extraordinary superiority so that, without genuine doubt, such person is deemed to be fit to perform the judicial function with distinction.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>By contrast, Judge Sagel\u2019s challenger, former federal prosecutor Charles Pell, received the lowest rating from the association, \u201cNot Qualified.\u201d This is given to those candidates \u201cpossessing less than the minimum qualities and attributes considered necessary to perform the judicial function adequately and satisfactorily.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>As editorial board member John Seiler noted in his <a href=\"https:\/\/www.ocregister.com\/2026\/04\/09\/john-seiler-ami-sagel-vs-charles-pell-for-orange-county-superior-court-judge\/\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">column<\/a> based on interviews conducted with both candidates, this race did see some early skirmishes. Most notably, Pell argued that Judge Sagel should be listed on the ballot by her full name. On the OC Superior Court <a href=\"https:\/\/www.occourts.org\/general-information\/judicial-officers\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">website<\/a>, she is listed as Ami Sheth Sagel, with Sheth being her maiden name and Sagel the name of her husband who she married in 2013. This complaint was appropriately rejected by the court.\t\t\t\t<\/p>\n<p>We\u2019ll pause here to just note that if the strongest objection to the judge is her name, there\u2019s no case for removing her.<\/p>\n<p>Indeed, the judge has served Orange County well. That\u2019s why she boasts the broad support of Orange County judges, Sheriff Don Barnes and four of the five county supervisors.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThroughout my career, I have stood on the shoulders of so many who have helped me learn the law, develop my craft, remember the importance of our democracy, and never lose my humanity,\u201d she told us. \u201cI am grateful to those who encourage me to seek appointment to the bench and to those who support me now. My mission is simple \u2014 it is to help people.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>We endorse Ami S. Sagel.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Judge Ami Sagel was appointed to the bench in 2023 and is now seeking a full-term in Orange&hellip;\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":309383,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[36],"tags":[163,165,164,1965,9198,975],"class_list":["post-311440","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-anaheim","tag-anaheim","tag-anaheim-headlines","tag-anaheim-news","tag-editorials","tag-endorsements","tag-opinion"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/311440","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=311440"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/311440\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/309383"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=311440"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=311440"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=311440"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}