{"id":3177,"date":"2025-10-14T05:33:07","date_gmt":"2025-10-14T05:33:07","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/3177\/"},"modified":"2025-10-14T05:33:07","modified_gmt":"2025-10-14T05:33:07","slug":"californias-proposition-50-when-the-right-action-reflects-the-wrong-outcome-opinion","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/3177\/","title":{"rendered":"California&#8217;s Proposition 50: When the right action reflects the wrong outcome | Opinion"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/1760419987_780_thumbnail.jpeg\" width=\"100%\" alt=\"photo-slider visualization\"\/><\/p>\n<p>California voters received a <a href=\"https:\/\/www.laloyolan.com\/news\/the-race-to-redistrict-what-proposition-50-means-for-california\/article_ddd54784-b1c5-4734-aff0-c762deba43a3.html\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">special election ballot<\/a> this month in the mail with a single, poignant question: Should California authorize temporary changes to California congressional district maps in response to Texas&#8217; partisan redistricting?<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThat becomes an ethical question for a democrat who favors good government. Should I accept this temporary getting rid of fairly drawn lines, because what the Republicans and Trump are doing is so wrong, that you have to combat it?\u201d said <a href=\"https:\/\/bellarmine.lmu.edu\/politicalscience\/faculty\/?expert=richard.fox\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Richard Fox<\/a>, Ph.D., professor of political science and dean of the Bellarmine College of Liberal Arts (BCLA).<\/p>\n<p>Since the passing of Proposition 11 in 2008, California has had an independent citizen-led group, the <a href=\"https:\/\/wedrawthelines.ca.gov\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\">California Citizens Redistricting Commission<\/a> (CRC), responsible for drawing new district lines. In 2010, the CRC gained the added responsibility of <a href=\"https:\/\/igs.berkeley.edu\/library\/california-ballot-proposition-guides\/november-4-2008-general-election-summary\/november-4-9\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">drawing Congressional districts<\/a>, which controls how many seats California has in the House of Representatives, and which areas of the state those districts make up. In doing so they took the power of redistricting away from legislative bodies, and instead put it in the hands of citizens. Other states like New York, Colorado and Montana <a href=\"https:\/\/redistricting.lls.edu\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">followed suit<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cCitizens in a bunch of states have decided that they trust themselves more than they trust incumbent politicians. They want to be in control of deciding which politicians to elect rather than the other way around,\u201d said <a href=\"https:\/\/www.lls.edu\/faculty\/justinlevitt\/\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Justin Levitt<\/a>, professor of law at Loyola Law School and founder of <a href=\"https:\/\/redistricting.lls.edu\/about\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\">All About Redistricting<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>Independent commissions are one of the facets of the Californian government that make me proud of being from this state. It shows that we value people over political parties. This furtherance of democracy remains unknown to states like Texas where drawing district maps is a choice made by legislators. This creates the opportunity for political power grabs as seen by the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.npr.org\/2025\/08\/04\/g-s1-80957\/texas-redistricting-quorum-walkout\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\">proposed maps from the State Legislature<\/a> in Texas, which would add five new Republican leaning districts ahead of the 2026 midterms. These districts do not reflect the population of Texas and were created very explicitly for Republican political gain. It puts power in the hands of politicians and lets them control who gets elected to represent Texans.<\/p>\n<p>Proposition 50 directly combats this through <a href=\"https:\/\/calmatters.org\/politics\/2025\/10\/proposition-50-communities-split\/\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">the creation of Democrat leaning<\/a> districts, but it suspends the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.asianlawcaucus.org\/news-resources\/guides-reports\/voter-resources-for-ca-nov-4-special-election\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">CRC\u2019s ability to enact congressional district maps until 2031<\/a>. Through compromising the integrity of our state\u2019s democratic processes, Proposition 50 prevents a greater national threat of an undemocratic takeover. The <a href=\"https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2025\/08\/17\/us\/politics\/redistricting-polarization-congress.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\">increasing political polarization<\/a> in this country has created an environment where partisan identities threaten the checks and balances of our country\u2019s constitution. Yet, Proposition 50, at a state level, reflects the same behavior as those who threaten democracy.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cIt\u2019s gerrymandering, that\u2019s what it is, and it\u2019s plain and simple trying to give the government the power to change districts,\u201d said Elizabeth Leka, a journalism major. \u201cI understand that it\u2019s to gain power in the House \u2026 I just don\u2019t understand because it makes us as bad as them.\u201d<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.brennancenter.org\/our-work\/research-reports\/gerrymandering-explained\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Gerrymandering<\/a> is the term used to describe the unconstitutional manipulation of congressional and state districts to favor one\u2019s party. Despite it being unconstitutional and thus unlawful, a <a href=\"https:\/\/www.congress.gov\/crs-product\/LSB10324#:~:text=As%20a%20result%20of%20Rucho%2C%20federal%20courts,to%20resolve%20claims%20of%20unconstitutional%20partisan%20gerrymandering.\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\">2019 Supreme Court Case<\/a> made it impossible to combat gerrymandering beyond a state level. The Supreme Court deemed that political gerrymandering could not be subject to Federal Court review, which left redistricting unsupervised in the hands of states.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThey blocked federal courts from hearing cases about partisan gerrymandering \u2026 and the real unfortunate thing, it\u2019s part of what happens when the rule of law breaks down, people turn to self-help,\u201d said Levitt. \u201cTexas has decided to violate the Constitution and there are no adults in the room to stop them. I can understand California voters choosing to decide that they want to violate the Constitution, too. \u201d<\/p>\n<p>The idea of fighting fire with fire has garnered a mixed response from voters with a current lean towards supporting the measure. According to recent polling from the firm <a href=\"https:\/\/app.displayr.com\/Dashboard?id=707a2765-e49a-4b3e-923d-761bedaf3c37#page=4172bb6a-a0e3-4c41-a979-45229cdbea14\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\">co\/efficient<\/a>, 54% of Californians support the measure, while 36% oppose it and the remaining 10% are undecided. The lack of alternatives to combating gerrymandering on a national scale leaves Californians like myself desperate to take action.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cI think the fact that Texas redrew their districts to fit the agenda of the Republicans even though they already have the majority in the House and Senate and the president is a Republican is pretty dirty,\u201d said Gabriella Gutierrez, a film and television production and Spanish double major. \u201cAlso, the fact that Texans didn\u2019t get to vote on whether they wanted this to happen, I think, is unconstitutional.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>The key difference between California\u2019s governmental power and Texas\u2019 power is that it comes with an expiration date. The usage of the California proposed map ends in 2031 and power returns to our independent commission, while Texas keeps power over its people.<\/p>\n<p>                        <img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"data:image\/png;base64,iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAAAQAAAADCAQAAAAe\/WZNAAAAEElEQVR42mM8U88ABowYDABAxQPltt5zqAAAAABJRU5ErkJggg==\" alt=\"Hand voting drawing, election vintage illustration. Free public domain CC0 image. More: View public domain image source here\" class=\"img-responsive lazyload full white\" width=\"1400\" height=\"1024\" data- data-\/><\/p>\n<p>                                    Photo via Creative Commons<\/p>\n<p>The beauty of Proposition 50 is that the decision is still in the hands of the Californians. We can vote yes or no; the choice is not being made for us by legislatures. We live in a state where we, the people, have the power. The question becomes whether you are concerned about our political representation more at a state level or a national one. We unfortunately have to sacrifice one to protect the other. I trust my state\u2019s ability to govern fairly more than our nation\u2019s, which is why I will be voting for Proposition 50 and I encourage others to do the same.<\/p>\n<p>While some may argue that the proposition sets a precedent of gerrymandering and unconstitutional action, the national threat of a political takeover looms over us. We cannot afford to lose fair representation at a country-wide level so we have to make certain concessions as a state.<\/p>\n<p>This is the opinion of Athena Cheris, a senior film production major from San Francisco, Calif. Email comments to <a href=\"https:\/\/www.laloyolan.com\/opinion\/californias-proposition-50-when-the-right-action-reflects-the-wrong-outcome\/mailto:editor@theloyolan.com\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\">editor@theloyolan.com<\/a>. Follow and tweet comments to @LALoyolan on Twitter, and like the Loyolan on Facebook.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"California voters received a special election ballot this month in the mail with a single, poignant question: Should&hellip;\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":3178,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[6],"tags":[7,4060,9,8,4059,4061,1362,4062,4058],"class_list":{"0":"post-3177","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-california","8":"tag-california","9":"tag-california-citizens-redistricting-commission","10":"tag-california-headlines","11":"tag-california-news","12":"tag-gerrymandering","13":"tag-justin-levitt","14":"tag-prop-50","15":"tag-richard-fox","16":"tag-texas-redistricting"},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3177","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3177"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3177\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/3178"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3177"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3177"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3177"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}