{"id":318933,"date":"2026-05-16T14:57:49","date_gmt":"2026-05-16T14:57:49","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/318933\/"},"modified":"2026-05-16T14:57:49","modified_gmt":"2026-05-16T14:57:49","slug":"at-runyon-canyons-1m-la-bathrooms-the-anger-is-overflowing","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/318933\/","title":{"rendered":"At Runyon Canyon’s $1M LA bathrooms, the anger is overflowing"},"content":{"rendered":"

Three months ago, a nondescript beige building was carefully lowered by crane into Runyon Canyon Park<\/a>, one of the most heavily used hiking areas in Los Angeles<\/a>.\u00a0<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

Once fully operational this summer, the building\u2019s two stalls will offer a permanent public restroom for the very first time at the Hollywood-area park, which sees about 2 million visitors each year. The public bathrooms were a long time coming; the lack of a place to go had long left Runyon Canyon out of compliance<\/a> with city standards for park service.\u00a0<\/p>\n

Los Angeles overall is in the midst of both a public parks crisis and a public bathroom crisis, lagging behind other major cities on both metrics. Los Angeles city parks have approximately 1.4 bathrooms per 10,000 residents, according to the Trust for Public Land<\/a>, compared with 3.8 public park bathrooms per 10,000 residents in San Francisco<\/a>.\u00a0<\/p>\n

Article continues below this ad<\/p>\n

Despite those stark numbers, Runyon Canyon\u2019s approximately $1 million bathroom still quickly found itself the target of fierce neighborhood opposition after city council member\u00a0Nithya Raman announced the project last fall, with detractors arguing that offering bathrooms at an already crowded park space would draw more visitors, including people experiencing homelessness (who are\u00a0underserved by LA\u2019s lack of public restrooms<\/a>). Some have also taken issue with the cost of the project.\u00a0<\/p>\n

\"People<\/p>\n

People hike the trails at Runyon Canyon Park in Los Angeles on Feb. 27, 2025.\u00a0<\/p>\n

Juliana Yamada\/Los Angeles Times\/Getty Images<\/p>\n

One new meme-filled online account, Runyon Canyon Guardians, has emerged as a particularly aggressive opponent of the park restrooms. \u201cRunyon Canyon is being destroyed right in front of us,\u201d\u00a0the group wrote in a December 2025 Facebook post<\/a>. \u201c… We\u2019ve begged for enforcement, for cleanup, for basic safety. Instead we get a million-dollar magnet for more chaos. Enough.\u201d<\/p>\n

Article continues below this ad<\/p>\n

By most standards, adding a public restroom in a park that sees thousands of visitors per day, but doesn\u2019t have any easily accessible restrooms nearby, seems like a logical solution. By LA\u2019s own standards, it\u2019s an update should have happened years ago, maybe when the park first opened some 40 years ago, or about a decade ago when Thrillist penned a piece titled \u201cThe 10 Best Places to Pee Around Runyon Canyon, Ranked.\u201d<\/a> (The options included the park\u2019s entrance gate, an overlook bench and a \u201cPlease Clean Up After Your Pet\u201d sign.)\u00a0<\/p>\n

While joking in tone, the Thrillist piece underlined an undeniable truth about bodily functions: Taking away bathrooms doesn\u2019t take away the urge to go. The city of LA noted this (and cited the Thrillist piece) in an official, 76-page report commissioned in 2019 on the future of Runyon Canyon Park.\u00a0<\/p>\n

\u201cThe article pokes fun at the absence of public restrooms, instead listing trees and structures around the Park as places to pee. This article, while meant to be humorous, highlights the gravity of the situation,\u201d stated the otherwise staid report.\u00a0<\/p>\n

Article continues below this ad<\/p>\n

\"A<\/p>\n

A close-up of the Runyon Canyon Park sign in Los Angeles on April 17, 2024.<\/p>\n

Ashley Hayes-Stone\/SFGATE<\/p>\n

Runyon Canyon covers 160 acres of protected hillsides and prime real estate just a couple of blocks north of the busiest stretch of Hollywood Boulevard. Much of the rest of the surrounding Hollywood Hills is dotted with multimillion-dollar homes, and Runyon Canyon was similarly slated for development several times over the decades. Back in the 1940s<\/a>, neighboring residents fought off plans for a new country club development designed by famous architect Frank Lloyd Wright. The city acquired the canyon as park space in 1984.<\/p>\n

In the years since, the park\u2019s relatively short hiking trails have become a destination in their own right. The wide main trail remains a favorite for locals, visiting tourists and celebrities alike. And what all those people have in common? The need for bathrooms.\u00a0<\/p>\n

Many first-time visitors and tourists might not know in advance that there aren\u2019t bathrooms at the park, noted the 2019 report on the park<\/a>. And after fighting off other cars and circling the surrounding area for 20 minutes looking for parking \u2014 Runyon Canyon also lacks a parking lot, and many of the surrounding streets are resident-only parking \u2014 visitors probably aren\u2019t eager to immediately jump back in their car to search for a public bathroom (which are also far and few between on Hollywood Boulevard) before starting their hike.\u00a0<\/p>\n

Article continues below this ad<\/p>\n

\u201cGo before you go or hit some of the bushes,\u201d one visitor wrote on Tripadvisor.<\/a>\u00a0<\/p>\n

\"Individuals<\/p>\n

Individuals walk at Runyon Canyon Park in Los Angeles on April 17, 2024.<\/p>\n

Ashley Hayes-Stone\/SFGATE<\/p>\n

The 2019 report noted some concerns about the potentially negative impacts of restrooms in the park. Surveyed stakeholders expressed concern about potential \u201cdrug use, vagrancy, maintenance and upkeep, and an increase in Park visitation.\u201d And ultimately, the report noted, those concerns should be weighed against the alternative: public urination and defecation in the park and its surroundings.\u00a0<\/p>\n

\u201cUltimately, the City should not ignore the public health and sanitation issues that are apparent without restrooms. There have been instances of public urination and defecation within the Park and even outside or on nearby private properties,\u201d the report stated.\u00a0<\/p>\n

Article continues below this ad<\/p>\n

A few portable toilets\u00a0were added to the park in December 2022 as a temporary fix while the city worked on a permanent solution. Tackling other issues at the park, such as trash, visitor management and enforcement, also relies in part on having bathrooms available. The city couldn\u2019t fairly ask a park employee to spend the day staffing the park when there\u2019s no bathroom available\u00a0\u2014 \u201can important consideration for suitable working conditions.\u201d<\/p>\n

In 2015, officials conducted outreach to park users in an effort to make the space better for all. Adding restrooms\u00a0ranked second<\/a> in \u201cthings to change\u201d about the park. Two additional surveys in June and October 2018 found 75% and 65% support, respectively, for public restrooms at the park. Support was slightly lower among nearby residents (who by definition already have a place to do their business near Runyon Canyon) but still came in at or above 50%.<\/p>\n

\"Hikers<\/p>\n

Hikers walk the winding trail in Runyon Canyon Park in Los Angeles.\u00a0<\/p>\n

Adam Mustafa\/Getty Images<\/p>\n

Bathroom opponents have criticized the total cost of installing the permanent bathroom<\/a> at Runyon Canyon Park, which adds up to around $950,000. The restroom purchase itself cost $283,796, but site prep and adding utilities cost another $528,650, plus $134,570 in permit fees and contingency funds. Building much-needed public restrooms and their required infrastructure (plumbing, water hookups, electricity) can be expensive.\u00a0<\/p>\n

Article continues below this ad<\/p>\n

In San Francisco, a proposed $1.7 million public restroom in Noe Valley<\/a> received similar criticism over the project costs, but the total cost was reduced to around $725,000 after two vendors essentially donated their services<\/a> and didn\u2019t charge for building and installation costs. In New York City, a 2019 investigation by THE CITY, a local outlet, found that the city\u2019s park restrooms cost an average of $3.6 million each<\/a>.\u00a0<\/p>\n

Runyon Canyon Guardians<\/a>, which seems to have launched social media accounts in early 2025 after the Sunset Fire near the park, became an oft-quoted voice against the bathrooms. The ad hoc organization was name-checked in a variety of news stories about the project last year<\/a>, though lately, the group has been less focused on the bathroom and more focused on elevating Spencer Pratt, the former reality star and Republican mayoral candidate. The group\u2019s social media pages also repeatedly use slurs to describe other candidates, including Nithya Raman, a progressive candidate for mayor who currently represents the City Council district covering Runyon Canyon (and who championed the park\u2019s restrooms).\u00a0<\/p>\n

\"image\"<\/p>\n

Stay informed, and entertained.<\/p>\n

By signing up, you agree to our Terms Of Use<\/a> and acknowledge that your information will be used as described in our Privacy Policy<\/a>.<\/p>\n

In February, the group described the bathroom as<\/a> \u201ca small scale microcosm of why Nythia Raman and her comrade handlers at the terrorist group Democrat Socialists of America must not be near the Mayors office and removed forcefully by our military from all offices.\u201d<\/p>\n

Article continues below this ad<\/p>\n

\"The<\/p>\n

The view from Runyon Canyon Park in Los Angeles.<\/p>\n

Getty Images<\/p>\n

Meanwhile, Friends of Runyon Canyon, a longstanding nonprofit focused on the park, has heralded the bathroom\u2019s arrival.<\/p>\n

\u201cNo more people forced to hide behind bushes or deal with awkward, makeshift \u201cbathroom\u201d situations along the trail. That\u2019s a win for everyone and a major step toward keeping the park cleaner, safer, and more welcoming for families, kids, seniors, runners, and visitors alike,\u201d the group said in\u00a0a February Facebook post<\/a>.\u00a0<\/p>\n