{"id":323334,"date":"2026-05-19T20:00:12","date_gmt":"2026-05-19T20:00:12","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/323334\/"},"modified":"2026-05-19T20:00:12","modified_gmt":"2026-05-19T20:00:12","slug":"moving-to-california-with-a-gun-you-might-have-to-take-a-four-hour-course","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/323334\/","title":{"rendered":"Moving to California with a gun? You might have to take a four-hour course"},"content":{"rendered":"

This story was originally published by CalMatters<\/a>. Sign up<\/a> for their newsletters.<\/p>\n

Californians would have to take a four-hour course with live-fire training to buy a gun if a bill advancing through the Legislature gets signed into law.<\/p>\n

Senate Bill 948<\/a>, by Berkeley Democratic Sen. Jesse Arregu\u00edn<\/a>, also would require gun owners moving to California to obtain a firearm safety certificate and register their firearms within 180 days of their arrival. Beginning in 2028, obtaining that certificate would require completing the training.<\/p>\n

It\u2019s the latest effort by California Democrats to add more restrictions on firearm ownership in a state that already has some of the toughest gun laws in the country<\/a>. However, it\u2019s hardly certain the bill will become law. A similar measure died in the Legislature last year.<\/p>\n

Keep up with LAist.<\/p>\n

If you’re enjoying this article, you’ll love our daily newsletter, The LA Report. Each weekday, catch up on the 5 most pressing stories to start your morning in 3 minutes or less. <\/p>\n

This year\u2019s proposal advanced from the Senate Appropriations Committee Thursday on a party-line vote with Republicans opposed. Committee members offered no comment on the measure and did not take any public testimony, which is typical for that committee.<\/p>\n

But in March, when an earlier version of the bill would have required eight hours of training, Arregu\u00edn told the Senate Public Safety Committee the proposed training requirements would reduce gun violence and prevent accidental shootings.<\/p>\n

\u201cFirearm safety is essential in preventing firearm-related incidents, especially those involving children,\u201d he said<\/a>. \u201cBy strengthening training requirements and closing gaps in current law, SB 948 will ensure responsible gun ownership to keep Californians and communities safe.\u201d<\/p>\n

Rebecca Marcus, a lobbyist for the Brady Campaign, told the committee<\/a> there were more than 69,000 shootings resulting in death or requiring urgent medical care in California from 2016 to 2021. Around one in three of those shootings were accidental, she said. Many involved children.<\/p>\n

Gun rights advocates said the bill would be challenged in court if it becomes law.<\/p>\n

Adam Wilson of Gun Owners of California called the proposed requirements<\/a> \u201can insurmountable barrier to exercising a constitutional right.\u201d<\/p>\n

Clay Kimberling, a lobbyist for the National Rifle Association\u2019s Institute for Legislative Action, said that\u2019s especially true for the estimated 115,000 gun owners who move to California each year.<\/p>\n

\u201cWhether they move into the state on a new job, a new military assignment, or family obligations such as helping a sick or elderly family member, lawful firearm owners would now have to search out an instructor, pay for the class \u2026 and take eight hours out of their day \u2026 for simply wanting to continue to practice their constitutional right to keep and bear arms in a new state,\u201d Kimberling said<\/a>.<\/p>\n

That original version of the bill also would have required new California arrivals to register firearms and take the course within 60 days.<\/p>\n

Will the bill make it to Newsom?<\/p>\n

Under current law, Californians are required to pass a written test and pay $25 to obtain a five-year firearm safety certificate to purchase a gun, but no formal training course is required.<\/p>\n

Licensed hunters are required to take a mandatory hunting-safety course and aren\u2019t required to get a certificate when buying rifles or shotguns. Also exempt are those who\u2019ve obtained a concealed weapons permit, which is issued after 16 hours of mandatory training that includes live-fire at a gun range.<\/p>\n

Those exemptions would still apply.<\/p>\n

For everyone else, the proposed four hours of training would include coursework on state and federal gun laws, secure firearm storage, safe handling, the dangers of guns, use-of-force laws, how to sell firearms legally and conflict resolution. The live-fire portion of the course would need to last at least an hour.<\/p>\n

Second Amendment groups say paying a Department of Justice-certified firearms instructor would add at least $400 to the cost of buying a firearm. Applicants also would have to pay for ammunition, gun rentals and range fees. Fees and firearms taxes already can add more than $100 to the cost of a firearm in California.<\/p>\n

The training requirements would take effect July 1, 2028.<\/p>\n

Until then, beginning on Jan. 1, gun owners moving to the state would be required to pass the current written test and register their firearms with the Department of Justice within 180 days.<\/p>\n

Violating the proposed law would be a misdemeanor.<\/p>\n

The bill now moves to the full Senate. It will then have to advance through the Assembly by this summer if Gov. Gavin Newsom is to sign it. He hasn\u2019t taken a position on the legislation.<\/p>\n

Last year, a bill with eight-hour training requirements died in the Assembly Appropriations Committee.<\/p>\n

This article was originally published on CalMatters<\/a> and was republished under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives<\/a> license.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"This story was originally published by CalMatters. Sign up for their newsletters. Californians would have to take a…\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":323335,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[6],"tags":[11863,7,6544,9,8,4271,134681,134682,4623],"class_list":["post-323334","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-california","tag-bills","tag-california","tag-california-gun-laws","tag-california-headlines","tag-california-news","tag-gun-control","tag-gun-legislation","tag-gun-training","tag-laws"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/323334","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=323334"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/323334\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/323335"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=323334"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=323334"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=323334"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}