<\/p>\nAdd Preferred Source<\/p>\n
<\/a><\/p>\n
The re-establishment of wolves in California began last decade, when the storied canines began moving in from other states. Their comeback is widely seen as a conservation triumph but in some rural areas, where wolves have preyed on cattle, there\u2019s been resistance. About 10 wolf packs currently roam parts of the state, mostly in the far north.<\/p>\n
The Newsom administration didn\u2019t comment on the funding for wolves and other wildlife when contacted by the Chronicle. While state budget revenues aren\u2019t much different than they were in the last few years, the governor has made a point of trying to reduce spending and strengthen the state\u2019s financial health before leaving office in January.<\/p>\n
Article continues below this ad<\/p>\n
His proposed 2026-2027 budget, taking effect July 1, offers no funding for the state\u2019s Wolf-Livestock Compensation Program, which provides financial reimbursement to ranchers whose livestock is killed by wolves. The current budget included $2 million for the program.<\/p>\n
The California Department of Fish and Wildlife, which oversees wolf management, has promoted the compensation program as a way to not only to make ranchers whole but increase buy-in for the recovery.<\/p>\n
The program, launched in 2022 with a $3 million allocation, initially extended the reimbursement to wolf deterrence measures, like building fences, and it provided \u201cpay for presence\u201d funds to compensate ranchers for the stress wolves put on livestock. Payments for these purposes have since been dropped, though both ranching and conservation groups are pushing to restore them. They\u2019d like to see millions more allocated for compensation.<\/p>\n
Another program, the Human Wildlife Conflict Program, will receive a $1 million allocation under the proposed 2026-2027 budget, but the interest groups say this funding is also millions of dollars short of what it should be.<\/p>\n
The program is aimed at boosting the state\u2019s response to wildlife conflicts, not just with wolves but other animals in both rural and urban areas. The on-and-off-again funding for the program, which included $7 million in the 2021-22 fiscal year and $5 million in 2022-23, has helped pay for 20 short-term staff to handle and help prevent wildlife problems. The funding also went toward improvements to state wildlife tracking systems.<\/p>\n
Article continues below this ad<\/p>\n
\u201cIt\u2019s a total misstep to not have continued funding for this,\u201d said Pamela Flick, California program director for Defenders of Wildlife. \u201cWith the growing human population and increased effects of climate change, wildlife and humans are coming into more contact than ever before\u00a0\u2014 not less. So we really need a robust program.\u201d<\/p>\n
The Legislature is required to approve the governor\u2019s budget by June 15, and the governor is required to sign it into law by June 30. Lawmakers often pass a placeholder budget by June 15 to ensure they continue getting paid, and to give themselves more negotiating time before the new budget goes into effect on July 1, the start of the fiscal year.<\/p>\n
Arthur Middleton, a professor of wildlife management at UC Berkeley who has been helping the state navigate the controversial return of wolves, worries that the state\u2019s dearth of wildlife funding signals a broader shift away from responsibly stewarding wolves as well as bears, mountain lions, coyotes and other animals.<\/p>\n
Middleton warns that a lack of proactive management could allow more situations to escalate like the conflict last year in Sierra Valley (Plumas and Sierra counties). There, a pack of wolves was infuriating ranchers after it became acclimated to eating cattle. State officials resorted to a $1.4 million hazing program, but that didn\u2019t work, so they shot four wolves.<\/p>\n
Article continues below this ad<\/p>\n
\u201cGiven the urgency of the crisis and the breadth of the coalition working on solutions including the current funding request, it\u2019s a gut punch,\u201d he said. \u201cCalifornia is rallying to have big predators in abundance\u00a0\u2014 without wanting to pay for it.\u201d<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"A rancher’s banner decries the growing wolf population near MacArthur, Calif., on Jan. 28, 2026. Carlos Avila Gonzalez\/S.F.…\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":348267,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[6],"tags":[7,9,8,20,643,13],"class_list":["post-348266","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-california","tag-california","tag-california-headlines","tag-california-news","tag-climate","tag-environment","tag-politics"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/348266","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=348266"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/348266\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/348267"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=348266"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=348266"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=348266"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}