Votebeat is a nonprofit news organization reporting on voting access and election administration across the U.S. <\/p>\n
This news analysis was originally distributed in Votebeat\u2019s free weekly newsletter. Sign up to get future editions, including the latest reporting from Votebeat bureaus and curated news from other publications, delivered to your inbox every Saturday<\/a>.<\/p>\n President Donald Trump, a Republican, quickly took to social media after California\u2019s primary on Tuesday to accuse Democrats in late-night posts of trying to steal the election<\/a>, pointing to the state\u2019s long timeline for counting votes and large share of mail-in ballots. He asserted that the U.S. attorney\u2019s office in Los Angeles was investigating<\/a>. On Friday, Bill Essayli, the top federal prosecutor for Los Angeles, said he is overseeing \u201cmultiple election fraud investigations\u201d in California.<\/p>\n \u201cWe will follow the evidence wherever it leads and prosecute any violations of federal election law to the fullest extent,\u201d he wrote on X<\/a>. \u201cMy office will not look the other way. We will investigate and prosecute. Every legal vote deserves to be counted. Every illegal vote cancels one out.\u201d For their part, multiple California officials said<\/a> \u2014 again \u2014 that the state\u2019s long counting time doesn\u2019t mean anything is wrong. <\/p>\n Why does it take so long for California to count votes and declare winners? The question has dogged the Golden State for years and drawn additional scrutiny because of a partisan divide in voting methods. Republicans have long lamented that their candidates lead in early results and watch their advantage vanish as mail-in ballots are counted in the days and weeks after Election Day. But while Republicans claim this is evidence of fraud<\/a>, it actually reflects the fact that Republicans are more likely to vote in person and Democrats more likely to vote by mail \u2014 meaning more Democratic votes get counted later in the process.<\/p>\n By Friday afternoon, California voters still didn\u2019t know which candidates for governor and Los Angeles mayor would be on the November ballot. <\/p>\n Elections are under pressure. We help you understand what’s at stake.<\/p>\n Your guide through complex systems and key decisions shaping elections. Delivered weekly.<\/p>\n California is one of eight states that sends mail-in ballots to all registered voters. And a majority of California voters \u2014 nearly 90% in last year\u2019s special election<\/a> \u2014 use them. The Catch-22 is that it takes elections officials a lot longer to verify mail-in ballots than it takes to confirm in-person voting, creating long delays while they make sure there is no fraud.<\/p>\n And in California, a large number of voters drop off their mail-in ballots on or right before election day, creating a huge bottleneck of ballots that have to go through a signature check and other steps to make sure the vote can be counted.<\/p>\n Kim Alexander, founder and president of the California Voter Foundation, a nonprofit, nonpartisan group, refers to it as the \u201cpig in the python\u201d problem.<\/p>\n \u201cThe truth is we are taking extra steps to ensure the voting process is accessible and the vote count is accurate and reliable, and that\u2019s why it takes a long time,\u201d said Alexander.<\/p>\n Delays are compounded by state laws that allow elections officials to accept ballots postmarked by Election Day that arrive up to seven days later, and a lengthy process that requires counties to inform voters if there are problems with their mail-in ballots \u2014 such as missing signatures \u2014 that they usually have several weeks to fix.<\/p>\n Jesse Salinas, the voter registrar, assessor, and clerk-recorder of California\u2019s Yolo County who serves as president of the California Association of Clerks and Election Officials, said there is a tradeoff between speed and security.<\/p>\n \u201cIf you want speed, not as many people\u2019s votes are going to be counted that could legitimately be counted,\u201d he said. \u201cSo this tension exists between accessibility and speed.\u201d<\/p>\n California leaders admit there is a problem. \u201cWe wish the votes were counted faster, too,<\/a>\u201d Gov. Gavin Newsom, a Democrat, wrote on social media.<\/p>\n Two decades ago, California used to count 80% of its ballots within the first two days after an election, according to a California Voter Foundation analysis<\/a>. That fell to 50% in 2022. The state has gone some ways toward reversing the decline, with the figure rising to 66% in November 2024.<\/p>\n More resources could speed things up<\/p>\n One unique factor for California is its size. California is home to 23 million registered voters, far more than any other state. (Texas comes closest, with about 18.7 million registered voters.)<\/p>\n Last year, Newsom signed a law that requires California counties to count most votes within 13 days of the election<\/a>. This is the first election where we will see whether that speeds things up. Counties can ask for an extension, and they still have up to 30 days to certify the results, so the law only goes so far.<\/p>\n Local election officials and voter advocates say another major issue is funding, and the state doesn\u2019t provide counties with the money they need to speed up counting. <\/p>\n \u201cIf I have more space, more equipment, and more staffing, things could be done quicker,\u201d Salinas said.<\/p>\n Voting rights advocates like Alexander worry that the long vote counts, and the persistent criticism coming from the White House and others, are taking a toll on American confidence in the electoral system. One recent study<\/a> found that Americans\u2019 trust in elections fell from about 67% to 60% when people heard about unexplained delays in results. Another study<\/a> found that voter trust that votes will be accurately counted in the upcoming election fell from 77% in 2024 to 60% this year.<\/p>\n