{"id":383940,"date":"2026-07-02T18:39:07","date_gmt":"2026-07-02T18:39:07","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/383940\/"},"modified":"2026-07-02T18:39:07","modified_gmt":"2026-07-02T18:39:07","slug":"what-is-proposition-45-before-california-voters-in-the-2026-election-orange-county-register","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/383940\/","title":{"rendered":"What is Proposition 45 before California voters in the 2026 election? \u2013 Orange County Register"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Should California expedite the environmental impact review process for certain projects like housing, transportation or clean energy infrastructure?<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.sos.ca.gov\/elections\/ballot-measures\/qualified-ballot-measures\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener nofollow\">Proposition 45<\/a> would amend California\u2019s landmark environmental law, called CEQA, to limit the scope of environmental review and set deadlines for public agencies to complete the review process.<\/p>\n<p>The measure \u2014 called the \u201cBuilding an Affordable California Act\u201d \u2014 would also establish deadlines for filing and resolving lawsuits and limit the evidence courts may consider and the relief available.<\/p>\n<p>Its <a href=\"https:\/\/oag.ca.gov\/system\/files\/initiatives\/pdfs\/25-0023A1%20%28%26quot%3BEssential%20Projects%26quot%3B%29.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener nofollow\">stated purpose<\/a> is to \u201cmake California more affordable by streamlining and speeding approval of essential projects\u201d to reduce costs, create jobs and improve the quality of life for Californians while maintaining environmental protections.<\/p>\n<p>Backers of Proposition 45 said California has an outdated environmental review process that increases costs and works against public health goals for essential infrastructure projects.<\/p>\n<p>The expedited review would apply to the following project categories:<\/p>\n<p>\u2022 Water<\/p>\n<p>\u2022 Hospitals and clinics<\/p>\n<p>\u2022 Clean energy and electricity<\/p>\n<p>\u2022 Housing of all types<\/p>\n<p>\u2022 Roads, bridges and transit<\/p>\n<p>\u2022 Wildfire prevention and resilience<\/p>\n<p>\u2022 Public schools and educational facilities<\/p>\n<p>\u2022 Broadband and telecommunications infrastructure<\/p>\n<p>Proposition 45 is sponsored by the <a href=\"https:\/\/calchamberalert.com\/2025\/10\/31\/building-an-affordable-california-ballot-initiative\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener nofollow\">California Chamber of Commerce<\/a>. Top funders include nonprofit public policy advocacy group Building a Better California, clean energy advisory firm Edison International &amp; Affiliated Entities and the California Building Industry Association.<\/p>\n<p>More than 200 public health and environmental organizations <a href=\"https:\/\/assets.nationbuilder.com\/mbca\/pages\/11621\/attachments\/original\/1777586662\/Letter_to_Legislature_%E2%80%93_CalChamber_Initiative%E2%80%934.27.26_%281%29.pdf?1777586662\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener nofollow\">signed a letter<\/a> to the California Legislature earlier this year opposing the initiative. Included among these organizations are the California Environmental Justice Alliance and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.ocregister.com\/2026\/01\/17\/surfrider-launches-effort-to-restore-native-dunes-in-seal-beach\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener nofollow\">the Surfrider Foundation<\/a>, a San Clemente-based ocean preservation nonprofit.<\/p>\n<p>The letter said that instead of streamlining project approvals, Proposition 45 would \u201cfundamentally undermine the public health and environmental protections\u201d that the extensive CEQA review process provides.<\/p>\n<p>The estimated cost to implement Proposition 45 is tens of millions of dollars annually for the first several years, with net savings expected over time due to reduced administrative and legal workloads, according to the California Legislative Analyst and the director of finance.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Should California expedite the environmental impact review process for certain projects like housing, transportation or clean energy infrastructure?&hellip;\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":383927,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[6],"tags":[1400,7,5307,9,8,400,204,643,100,13],"class_list":["post-383940","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-california","tag-2026-elections","tag-california","tag-california-ballot-measures","tag-california-headlines","tag-california-news","tag-california-politics","tag-election","tag-environment","tag-news","tag-politics"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/383940","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=383940"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/383940\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/383927"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=383940"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=383940"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=383940"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}