{"id":396907,"date":"2026-07-13T19:32:13","date_gmt":"2026-07-13T19:32:13","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/396907\/"},"modified":"2026-07-13T19:32:13","modified_gmt":"2026-07-13T19:32:13","slug":"san-francisco-to-vote-on-whether-to-set-up-public-bank","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/396907\/","title":{"rendered":"San Francisco to vote on whether to set up public bank"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Key insight: San Francisco voters will decide on Nov. 3 whether to approve a governance framework that would make the city the first municipality in the country to establish a public bank.Expert quote: &#8220;San Francisco has every ability in the world to do a safe, successful public bank. But they need laws that are attuned to the differences between private banks and public banks.&#8221; \u2014 Earl Staelin, legal advisor to the Public Banking InstituteForward look: California&#8217;s authorization for municipal public banks sunsets in 2028, which is pushing supervisors to move now rather than wait for a proposal that includes a funding source. Even if voters approve the measure, separate legislation will be needed to actually capitalize the bank.<\/p>\n<p>San Francisco voters will decide this November whether the city becomes the first municipality in the country to launch a public bank.<\/p>\n<p>Processing Content<\/p>\n<p>By a 9-2 vote, the San Francisco Board of Supervisors approved placing a measure on the Nov. 3 ballot on whether to create a &#8220;municipal financial corporation.&#8221; The board&#8217;s July 7 vote set forth a governance framework that would allow a public bank to operate if voters approve the measure.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>If passed, San Francisco would become the second public bank in the U.S., after the century-old Bank of North Dakota, which is generally cited as the only public bank currently operating in the country. A 2025 poll by the San Francisco Public Bank Coalition found approximately 67% of likely voters supported the establishment of a municipal public bank.<\/p>\n<p>Supervisors Alan Wong, who represents the Sunset District, and Stephen Sherrill, whose district includes the Marina and Pacific Heights, cast the dissenting votes.<\/p>\n<p>The proposed bank would focus initial lending on three areas: affordable housing, green energy and small businesses. The legislation explicitly prohibits the bank from lending to fossil-fuel corporations or weapons manufacturers.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>Governance appointments would be split among the city attorney, controller, treasurer-tax collector, mayor and board of supervisors, with day-to-day operations run by professional bankers under public oversight.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;A public bank would open the doors to build an engine for affordable housing, a lifeline for struggling small businesses and the financial backbone for our climate goals,&#8221; Supervisor Chyanne Chen, one of five co-sponsors of the legislation, told KQED.<\/p>\n<p>Earl Staelin, legal advisor to the Public Banking Institute, an advocacy group, said that a public bank for San Francisco is &#8220;totally aligned with the interest of the city.&#8221; The bank&#8217;s goal would be to &#8220;protect the city&#8217;s economy, make it strong, make it stable, and to invest locally in the city,&#8221; rather than chase &#8220;whatever makes the highest profit,&#8221; Staelin added.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>Notably, the measure heading to voters does not include a funding mechanism. The bank is expected to need hundreds of millions of dollars in startup capital before it could begin issuing loans.<\/p>\n<p>Supporters have floated several possible paths to capitalization, including a tax on major financial institutions, philanthropic funding or a union trust arrangement.<\/p>\n<p>Supervisor Jackie Fielder, a longtime public bank advocate, acknowledged to KQED that &#8220;further legislation is definitely going to be needed to actually capitalize the bank.&#8221; Fielder added that she would &#8220;like to see a tax on major financial institutions to fund the public bank,&#8221; though she also put private philanthropic dollars on the table.<\/p>\n<p>Misha Steier, spokesperson for the San Francisco Public Bank Coalition, framed the November vote as low-risk for the city precisely because the measure does not touch the funding question. &#8220;This is looking like it&#8217;s in a strong position, given that we&#8217;re just asking voters to pick a good set of rules for the bank,&#8221; Steier added in comments quoted by KQED.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>Wong, one of the two &#8220;no&#8221; votes, grounded his objection in the city&#8217;s institutional track record and current &#8220;budget challenges.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;A public bank would represent a major new responsibility for local government and would require substantial expertise, oversight, and financial risk management,&#8221; Wong said in a statement to American Banker. &#8220;Before asking taxpayers to support an undertaking of this scale, the City should be able to clearly demonstrate how it would be funded, governed, and held accountable.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>The dissenting supervisor also encouraged voters to &#8220;learn from history,&#8221; highlighting public banks that have failed in the U.S.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;A public bank may be well-intentioned, but good intentions alone are not enough. The City has a responsibility to carefully consider the financial risks and long-term obligations that come with operating a lending institution,&#8221; Wong wrote.<\/p>\n<p>The push to put the measure before voters this year is tied to a legislative clock.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>California legalized municipal public banking statewide in 2019 under the California Public Banking Act. San Francisco&#8217;s board of supervisors created a reinvestment working group two years later, which released a report on the costs and benefits of a public bank in 2023 \u2014 a plan the board adopted that same year. The state&#8217;s current authorization for cities to pursue public banks is set to expire in 2028.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;We really want to take advantage of this; otherwise, we will not have the legal context to allow San Francisco to make this legislation,&#8221; Chen said. &#8220;If the state law expires, then we have to work on a new state law before we can have this conversation again.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Under the 2019 state law, municipal public banks must obtain a formal banking charter and meet the same financial and regulatory standards as commercial banks \u2014 including obtaining deposit insurance from the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>Staelin said that the FDIC&#8217;s guidance on collateralization of public deposits is &#8220;really a killer&#8221; because the city does not &#8220;even have $50 million sitting around that they can easily part with for capital, let alone $200 million for capital for 110% collateral.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;That law just completely puts San Francisco in shackles until that state law is changed,&#8221; Staelin added. &#8220;San Francisco has every ability in the world to do a safe, successful public bank. But they need laws that are attuned to the differences between private banks and public banks.&#8221;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Key insight: San Francisco voters will decide on Nov. 3 whether to approve a governance framework that would&hellip;\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":396908,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[30],"tags":[7,102065,49704,101,103,102,104,106,105,159482],"class_list":["post-396907","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-san-francisco","tag-california","tag-lending","tag-politics-and-policy","tag-san-francisco","tag-san-francisco-headlines","tag-san-francisco-news","tag-sf","tag-sf-headlines","tag-sf-news","tag-small-business-lending"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/396907","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=396907"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/396907\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/396908"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=396907"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=396907"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=396907"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}