{"id":409513,"date":"2026-07-23T15:16:10","date_gmt":"2026-07-23T15:16:10","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/409513\/"},"modified":"2026-07-23T15:16:10","modified_gmt":"2026-07-23T15:16:10","slug":"advocates-start-bikes-on-board-campaign-for-muni-rail","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/409513\/","title":{"rendered":"Advocates Start “Bikes on Board” Campaign for Muni Rail"},"content":{"rendered":"

The lead image is from rush hour, with cyclists sharing space with other commuters on one of Muni\u2019s S-200 light rail vehicles, built in the Siemens facility in Sacramento. Okay, one part of that is inaccurate: the S-200 in the image isn\u2019t owned by Muni. It\u2019s the CTrain in Calgary, Alberta, Canada.<\/p>\n

But other than that, it\u2019s the same train car bodies and dimensions. Calgary Transit carries 152,700 people per weekday on its trains, making it one of the busiest LRT systems in North America. It welcomes bikes. Muni carries 126,000<\/a>. It bans them.<\/p>\n

As Streetsblog pointed out in a recent short video<\/a>, every rail transit system in North America allows bikes on board. Only two have restrictions on light rail vehicles.<\/p>\n

\"\"Muni rail is really special. Image taken from Halperin\u2019s report.<\/p>\n

All of which is why advocate Bruce Halperin has started a \u201cBike on Muni Metro\u201d member-led project with the San Francisco Transit Riders to change Muni\u2019s blanket bike ban<\/a>.<\/p>\n

From Halperin\u2019s project page:<\/p>\n

This policy has long prevented people riding bikes from accessing large portions of the city, especially on the Westside and Bayview, and is long overdue for reconsideration. Balboa Park, the Sunset District, West Portal, Bayview, and surrounding neighborhoods would be much more accessible if bicycles were available as a first-\/last-mile option for riders of the J, K, L, M, N, and T lines. These neighborhoods are underserved by Bay Wheels stations and bikes, so those are not currently a viable option for most riders.<\/p>\n

Prior to the pandemic, the rationale for banning bikes was crowding on Muni\u2019s downtown platforms and trains. However, the pandemic ushered in significant changes to San Franciscans\u2019 commute patterns, most notably by enabling work-from-home for large numbers of residents who formerly worked in offices downtown. Despite return-to-office mandates,\u00a0Muni\u2019s LRV lines remain substantially under capacity. This means additional space for bikes where there may not have been before the pandemic. Muni has also since phased out all of its LRV2 and LRV3 cars, and all LRV4 cars have space near the doors that is perfectly sized for most bicycles. Allowing people to board with bikes would help increase Muni ridership, which is badly needed at a time when Muni faces potentially devastating budget cuts.<\/p>\n

\u201cWe\u2019re searching for ways to get in contact with SFMTA planners to learn more about why bikes aren\u2019t allowed on Muni Metro and exploring ways riders can let the agency know there\u2019s a demand,\u201d explained the San Francisco Transit Riders\u2019 Reanne Lacosta.<\/p>\n

\u201cThe San Francisco Bicycle Coalition fully supports bikes on Muni light rail,\u201d said Claire Amable, SFBike\u2019s Director of Advocacy. <\/p>\n

\"\"Closer to home than the lead image: a scofflaw cyclist on a Muni train. The bike fits just fine and the train did not spontaneously explode as a result. Photo: Streetsblog\/Rudick<\/p>\n

\u201cAllowing bikes on Muni trains\u2014perhaps through a pilot limited to certain lines, days, and\/or hours\u2014is a worthwhile experiment to gauge demand, highlight benefits, and identify any issues,\u201d said Streets Forward\u2019s Luke Bornheimer.<\/p>\n

Streetsblog reached out to a couple of bike-friendly supervisors and will update this post. The Mayor\u2019s press office, as usual, declined to answer and referred questions to SFMTA.<\/p>\n

So what is SFMTA\u2019s official reason?<\/p>\n

As Halperin pointed out, Muni trains used to be overcrowded and sometimes didn\u2019t have space for bikes (or anything else). That was never true off-peak, of course, and it\u2019s doubly untrue since the pandemic. The simple fact is Muni officials have given constantly changing rationales. SFMTA Director Julie Kirschbaum once told Streetsblog it was because of the stairs. But lots of rail systems that allow bikes have stairs, including Amtrak and Caltrain. And if Muni\u2019s movable stairs are really dangerous for people holding bicycles, isn\u2019t the same true of anyone holding a suitcase or a shopping cart or a folding bike (which is allowed)? How about for someone in a wheelchair or using a cane? If the stairs are too dangerous for cyclists, they\u2019re too dangerous for everyone; maybe the answer is to build high-level platforms everywhere, not single out one group of riders.<\/p>\n

\"\"Muni stairs are not a reason to ban bikes. Photo: Wikimedia Commons<\/a>.<\/p>\n

Moreover, if that\u2019s really the issue (and it isn\u2019t), why not allow bikes on the T Third, which never lowers its stairs? Why not just ban bikes west of West Portal, since trains on the L, M, and K don\u2019t lower their stairs until that point. Or Muni could only allow bikes to alight at wheel-chair accessible stations with platforms and ramps<\/a>. It\u2019s really not that challenging, if the agency is interested in doing this.<\/p>\n

Meanwhile, the CTrain in Calgary previously only allowed bikes during off-peak times. In 2022, they changed the rules and piloted allowing bikes at all times, \u201cin response to commuting frustrations of cyclists<\/a>.\u201d The pilot became permanent, with a list of sensible restrictions<\/a>. Muni can and should also run some pilots to see how it works out, just like Caltrain, BART, and many other Bay Area rail transit systems did more than a decade ago<\/a>.<\/p>\n

\u201cBeing able to bring a bicycle on Muni light rail would drastically improve accessibility for students, families, and seniors and would seamlessly connect our transportation system as a whole,\u201d said Amable. \u201cWe look forward to working with SF Transit Riders on moving this campaign forward.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"The lead image is from rush hour, with cyclists sharing space with other commuters on one of Muni\u2019s…\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":409514,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[30],"tags":[109921,101,103,102,104,106,105],"class_list":["post-409513","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-san-francisco","tag-promoted","tag-san-francisco","tag-san-francisco-headlines","tag-san-francisco-news","tag-sf","tag-sf-headlines","tag-sf-news"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/409513","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=409513"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/409513\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/409514"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=409513"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=409513"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=409513"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}