{"id":443485,"date":"2026-08-25T23:52:13","date_gmt":"2026-08-25T23:52:13","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/443485\/"},"modified":"2026-08-25T23:52:13","modified_gmt":"2026-08-25T23:52:13","slug":"two-item-tuesday-spur-refutes-flexed-spending-canard","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/443485\/","title":{"rendered":"Two-Item Tuesday: SPUR Refutes &#8216;Flexed Spending&#8217; Canard"},"content":{"rendered":"<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Here are two quick update stories of interest to the safe and livable streets community.<\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Advocates call out the \u2018Flexed Spending\u2019 ruse<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" height=\"784\" width=\"1024\" src=\"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/Screenshot-from-2026-08-25-13-57-30.png\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-494293\"  \/>Crush loads returning to rush-hour BART. Photo:\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/bsky.app\/profile\/rebeccaforec.bsky.social\/post\/3mdg7cmq36c2d\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener nofollow\">Rebecca Saltzman<\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><a rel=\"noopener noreferrer nofollow\" target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/la.streetsblog.org\/2019\/02\/08\/high-speed-rail-will-take-people-out-of-electric-cars\">Oil shills<\/a> and other opponents of funding transit have a new \u201cargument\u201d they\u2019ve been using against the <a rel=\"noopener noreferrer nofollow\" target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/sf.streetsblog.org\/2026\/07\/29\/new-poll-shows-regional-measure-in-good-shape\">upcoming regional transit measure<\/a> that will appear on the November ballot: just take money from capital projects to fund operations.<\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Sure, that\u2019s a great idea if the real objective is to destroy both. From a new report <a rel=\"noopener noreferrer nofollow\" target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/www.spur.org\/news\/2026-08-19\/flexing-funds-isnt-answer-bay-area-transit-agencies-fiscal-woes\">from SPUR<\/a>:<\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Some tax opponents have suggested that other transit funding designated for capital projects could be \u201cflexed\u201d or shifted to fill operating deficits. SPUR investigated that idea and determined that flexing money from capital to operations isn\u2019t a viable response to the immediate funding crisis.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">SPUR supports this conclusion with numerous points including:<\/p>\n<p>Most capital funding cannot be used for operations. 77% of transit capital spending comes from state and federal sources with legal restrictions on how the money can be spent. The rest comes largely from local taxes that transit agencies do not directly control.<\/p>\n<p>Capital dollars are often committed to specific projects. State and federal grants come with detailed, multi-year funding agreements that impose strict legal conditions and requirements on use.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>The limited funding that can be \u201cflexed\u201d is nowhere near enough to solve the operating deficit. The Bay Area\u2019s transit agencies face recurring annual deficits. One-time capital dollars cannot sustainably fund ongoing service.<\/p>\n<p>Large-scale flexing would require decisions by other governments. Redirecting capital dollars largely would require action by the State Legislature, the Federal Government, or the Metropolitan Transportation Commission.\u00a0 Even if there was political will to do this, this cannot realistically provide the funding needed to prevent service cuts beginning in 2027.<\/p>\n<p>Raiding capital funds comes with real costs. Diverting local matching dollars can mean forfeiting much larger state and federal grants. And deferring maintenance can reduce reliability, increase future costs, and make transit service worse.<\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Bottom line is passage of the Connect Bay Area regional transit measure and the Stronger Muni for All measure in San Francisco is the only realistic way to avoid severe service cuts for the Bay Area\u2019s fiscally struggling transit operators. Period.<\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">For the full analysis, check out <a rel=\"noopener noreferrer nofollow\" target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/www.spur.org\/news\/2026-08-19\/flexing-funds-isnt-answer-bay-area-transit-agencies-fiscal-woes\">the report<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">And as a symbol of what happens when transit is short-changed<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" height=\"768\" width=\"1024\" src=\"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/1000003678.jpg\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-484854\"  \/>An earlier repair on Woodstock, but same idea. Get well soon, little boat! Photo: SF Bay Ferry<\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Woodstock, the popular water shuttle that connects <a rel=\"noopener noreferrer nofollow\" target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/sf.streetsblog.org\/2026\/08\/12\/woodstock-the-estuary-water-shuttle-remains-out-of-service\">Oakland and Western Alameda, was supposed to go back into service last weekend<\/a>. Unfortunately, while the replacement engines have arrived, were installed, and work fine, a new problem surfaced\u2014literally.<\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cThe engines have been installed and were functioning as of Saturday morning. But we found a small fracture on a bracket above the waterline and are now welding a repair,\u201d explained S.F. Bay Ferry\u2019s Tom Hall.<\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The little boat that could was taken out of service on August 4 when they blew a gasket in one of Woodstock\u2019s two engines. They mounted the backup engine, but then it failed too. And, as mentioned, when they had the boat out of the water, they noticed the crack, which Hall said isn\u2019t serious, but would require yet another suspension of service in the future if they didn\u2019t fix it now. \u201cWe anticipate return to service later this week,\u201d he said. \u201cA little more pain now to avoid a lot more pain next month.\u00a0\u201c<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"240\" height=\"320\" src=\"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/ws1.jpg\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-494295\"  \/>Woodstock\u2019s new engines are installed. But now there are new problems. Photo: SF Bay Ferry<\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Bottom line, the estuary service requires at least two purpose-built boats so <a rel=\"noopener noreferrer nofollow\" target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/sf.streetsblog.org\/2026\/01\/07\/oakland-alameda-water-shuttle-temporarily-out-of-action\">when one has to be taken out of service, there\u2019s another boat available<\/a>. Otherwise, transit becomes something people can\u2019t depend on. This service may officially still be a \u201cpilot.\u201d But it\u2019s become a vital link. The powers that be <a rel=\"noopener noreferrer nofollow\" target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/sf.streetsblog.org\/2024\/08\/28\/commentary-lets-talk-about-woodstock-the-water-shuttle-v2-0\">need to update their thinking about how it is funded<\/a>. Fortunately, that\u2019s happening.<\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cWe\u2019re participating in the City\u2019s ongoing study into the future of the service, which will determine that path (new build vs. retrofit),\u201d said Hall. \u201cObviously, propulsion is one part of the equation and Woodstock\u2019s hull and superstructure need to be evaluated as well. Identifying funding sources to enhance the service and its reliability will also be a part of that.\u201d<\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">UPDATE: 4:40 p.m. \u201cThe Oakland Alameda Water Shuttle will resume service at 7:20 AM on Wednesday 8\/26\/26\u201d according to SF Bay Ferry.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Here are two quick update stories of interest to the safe and livable streets community. Advocates call out&hellip;\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":443486,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[30],"tags":[109921,101,103,102,104,106,105],"class_list":["post-443485","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-san-francisco","tag-promoted","tag-san-francisco","tag-san-francisco-headlines","tag-san-francisco-news","tag-sf","tag-sf-headlines","tag-sf-news"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/443485","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=443485"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/443485\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/443486"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=443485"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=443485"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=443485"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}