{"id":443892,"date":"2026-08-26T09:14:50","date_gmt":"2026-08-26T09:14:50","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/443892\/"},"modified":"2026-08-26T09:14:50","modified_gmt":"2026-08-26T09:14:50","slug":"san-francisco-tower-residents-file-suit-against-city-royals-and-crown-center-for-ballpark-district-plans","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/443892\/","title":{"rendered":"San Francisco Tower residents file suit against City, Royals and Crown Center for ballpark district plans"},"content":{"rendered":"<p class=\"text | article-text\">KANSAS CITY, Mo. (KCTV) &#8211; Residents at a condominium tower near the proposed Crown Center Ballpark District have filed suit, seeking to halt any construction that would disturb their recorded property rights.<\/p>\n<p class=\"text | article-text\">The San Francisco Association, which represents residents of the San Francisco Tower Condominiums located at 2510 Grand Boulevard, filed a lawsuit Monday seeking a declaratory judgment and immediate injunctive relief following the City\u2019s approval of ballpark district plans for the Kansas City Royals in the Crown Center area.<\/p>\n<p class=\"text | article-text\">The city council approved the lease, development, funding and community benefits agreements for the $3 billion, 68-acre project last week. <\/p>\n<p class=\"text | article-text\">The San Francisco Tower Condominiums took issue with the development agreements between the City of Kansas City, the Royals and the Crown Center Redevelopment Corporation, which omit the condos from its recorded easements in the area. The suit said the plans for the area include no protections, utility relocation plans or compensation for the residents.<\/p>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" class=\"figure-img img-fluid mx-auto d-block\" fetchpriority=\"low\" loading=\"lazy\" alt=\"The San Francisco Association, which represents residents of the San Francisco Tower...\" src=\"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/7H4BCCS4EZDGZF5HRCPPU4NYVY.jfif.jpeg\" width=\"980\" height=\"734\" \/>The San Francisco Association, which represents residents of the San Francisco Tower Condominiums located at 2510 Grand Boulevard, filed a lawsuit Monday seeking a declaratory judgment and immediate injunctive relief following the City\u2019s approval of ballpark district plans for the Kansas City Royals in the Crown Center area.(KCTV5)<\/p>\n<p class=\"text | article-text\">Ken McClain, the attorney representing the San Francisco Association, said the recorded rights at stake are not just paperwork.<\/p>\n<p class=\"text | article-text\">\u201cThey are property rights,\u201d McClain said. \u201cIf someone invades or obstructs your easement, they have taken away a property right, no differently than if they\u2019ve condemned your lot.\u201d<\/p>\n<p class=\"text | article-text\">McClain said the association isn\u2019t trying to block the ballpark project outright.<\/p>\n<p class=\"text | article-text\">\u201cWe\u2019re not trying to stop the stadium project,\u201d he said. \u201cWhat the homeowners are trying to do is find a way to compatibly live with the project in a way that will allow them to maintain the value of their home and the use and enjoyment of it.\u201d<\/p>\n<p class=\"text | article-text\">McClain said Crown Center and the Royals have only offered vague assurances so far.<\/p>\n<p class=\"text | article-text\">\u201cAll there have been are statements that say they will address these in the future,\u201d McClain said. \u201cWe don\u2019t know what they mean by that, and we cannot allow them the flexibility to say we\u2019ll take care of you later.\u201d<\/p>\n<p class=\"text | article-text\">The lawsuit also alleges the proposed new Royals stadium would be built roughly 100 feet from the Tower\u2019s entrance and claims construction could destroy vital utility connections.<\/p>\n<p class=\"text | article-text\">Among the easements at issue: one property holds the rooftop chillers that provide air conditioning to the tower, according to the association. Residents say they\u2019ve been told their utilities won\u2019t be disrupted during construction, but they want specifics on how that will be accomplished.<\/p>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" class=\"figure-img img-fluid mx-auto d-block\" fetchpriority=\"low\" loading=\"lazy\" alt=\"San Francisco Tower is located northwest of the proposed Kansas City Royals new ballpark.\" src=\"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/2F2LTGSKGJGFJDP7WCMP7PTEGE.jpg\" width=\"980\" height=\"551\" \/>San Francisco Tower is located northwest of the proposed Kansas City Royals new ballpark.(KCTV5)<\/p>\n<p class=\"text | article-text\">It also takes issue with an alleged lack of communication between the defendants and the Towers association, with the lawsuit saying, \u201cspecifically, the preliminary plan filed in support of the rezoning states that \u2018utility easement releases\u2019 will be \u2018shown on UR final plans,\u2019 referring to releases that only (The San Francisco Association) can execute. But (the Towers) has not executed the release of any of its easements, and Defendants have made no attempt to acquire any such releases.\u201d<\/p>\n<p class=\"text | article-text\">When Kansas City\u2019s Planning Commission approved the rezoning application on Aug. 5, it attached conditions specifically addressing parking preservation and a light and noise study for the tower\u2019s residents, according to the lawsuit \u2014 an acknowledgment, the suit argues, that the tower is directly and specially affected by the project.<\/p>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" class=\"figure-img img-fluid mx-auto d-block\" fetchpriority=\"low\" loading=\"lazy\" alt=\"This drawing in the rezoning application shows the area to be rezoned. The parcels in orange...\" src=\"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/XD6Q27TCVFA2BMBMSVHNMEGHNI.jpg\" width=\"980\" height=\"551\" \/>This drawing in the rezoning application shows the area to be rezoned. The parcels in orange represent new construction. San Francisco Tower, the box KCTV5 has shaded in red, is exempt from rezoning, but the easement properties are not. An ordinance authorizing the rezoning needed for the development is expected before the council on Sept. 3.(Populous &amp; Olsson)<\/p>\n<p class=\"text | article-text\">A second condo building, Santa Fe Place, is also excluded from the rezoning boundary and holds similar recorded easements, according to McClain, but its residents have not joined the lawsuit. In public meetings, some have welcomed the stadium development. McClain said Santa Fe Place\u2019s situation differs in part because, unlike San Francisco Tower, it has no pedestrian walkway connecting it directly to Crown Center. Furthermore, it is a shorter building and the high-rise San Francisco Tower sits between the stadium and Santa Fe Place, providing a visual buffer.<\/p>\n<p class=\"text | article-text\">The San Francisco Tower is a 33-story residential condominium tower with approximately 135 units. It was built in 1976.<\/p>\n<p class=\"text | article-text\">The lawsuit says a recorded covenant between CCRC and any of its successors &#8212; including the Royals &#8212; requires them to maintain an adjacent parking garage guaranteeing roughly 400 parking spots for residents to lease parking.<\/p>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" class=\"figure-img img-fluid mx-auto d-block\" fetchpriority=\"low\" loading=\"lazy\" alt=\"The San Francisco Garden -- one of the easements for San Francisco Tower residents -- is...\" src=\"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/T3ML7U52ORDG3OK7Z4EIQEONZ4.jfif.jpeg\" width=\"980\" height=\"734\" \/>The San Francisco Garden &#8212; one of the easements for San Francisco Tower residents &#8212; is included as an example of easements residents want protected in the lawsuit.(KCTV5)<\/p>\n<p class=\"text | article-text\">Kansas City Mayor Quinton Lucas issued a statement Monday in response to the lawsuit.<\/p>\n<p class=\"mb-2\">I appreciated my recent visit with residents of the San Francisco Tower and look forward to further discussions. While the lawsuit does not threaten delivery of the baseball project and merely looks to clarify the property rights of neighbors adjacent to the future stadium, it is imperative that all parties reach amicable understandings, ensuring Crown Center and residents in the area continue to enjoy a great neighborhood and outstanding future development. <\/p>\n<p class=\"mb-2\">I will support all parties in reaching an amicable resolution, whether through the Court\u2019s declaration of rights outside the stadium footprint, as sought here, or through alternative dispute resolution.<\/p>\n<p class=\"text | article-text\">KCTV5 reached out to the City of Kansas City, the Kansas City Royals and Crown Center Redevelopment Corporation for comment. The city and the Royals both declined to comment, citing the pending litigation. Crown Center did not respond.<\/p>\n<p class=\"text | article-text\">The lawsuit seeks a temporary restraining order to stop the City, the Royals and the CCRC from starting demolition, excavation or construction that disturbs any of the easement areas, the parking garage, or the San Francisco Garden.<\/p>\n<p>Copyright 2026 KCTV. All rights reserved.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"KANSAS CITY, Mo. (KCTV) &#8211; Residents at a condominium tower near the proposed Crown Center Ballpark District have&hellip;\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":443893,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[30],"tags":[175898,9512,10909,2934,101,103,102,104,106,105],"class_list":["post-443892","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-san-francisco","tag-crown-center-ballpark-district","tag-kansas-city","tag-kansas-city-royals","tag-residents","tag-san-francisco","tag-san-francisco-headlines","tag-san-francisco-news","tag-sf","tag-sf-headlines","tag-sf-news"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/443892","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=443892"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/443892\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/443893"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=443892"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=443892"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=443892"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}