The 43-year-old tech scion \u2014 a film aficionado who has spent two decades building his career in Hollywood \u2014 has told associates he doesn’t want to leave L.A. But he has signaled that he’s prepared to sell the historic studio lots<\/a> and move Paramount’s and Warner Bros.’ operations from California if the merger isn’t finalized by next month, according to people familiar with the situation who were not authorized to comment<\/a>. <\/p>\n The prospect has rattled a region already reeling from steep declines in film production<\/a>, heavy job losses, empty soundstages and shuttered small businesses.<\/a> <\/p>\n “It would be devastating,” Assemblymember Rick Chavez Zbur, who represents a district that includes the Melrose Avenue movie lot and neighborhoods near Warner Bros. in Burbank, said of a Paramount move. “We need to do everything we can to protect these important jobs in California’s iconic industry.” <\/p>\n Paramount declined to comment. <\/p>\n Read more: Inside David Ellison’s desperate fight for Warner Bros.<\/a> <\/p>\n Ellison is frustrated after securing approvals from more than 65 regulators worldwide for the mammoth merger that would bring HBO, CNN, CBS, Comedy Central, MTV and TBS under the same roof. <\/p>\n Bonta’s lawsuit stands in the way<\/a>. <\/p>\n “California is the fourth-largest economy in the world and the best place to do business,” a spokesman from Bonta’s office said. “Strong antitrust enforcement is essential so everyone can benefit from a vibrant economy.” <\/p>\n A federal judge in Oakland temporarily blocked the dea<\/a>l, prompting Paramount to agree not to finalize the acquisition until after a trial or June 1, whichever comes first. Settlement talks collapsed in late August after Bonta accused Paramount of leaking and misrepresenting their discussions. <\/p>\n Paramount has plenty at stake. U.S. District Judge Araceli Mart\u00ednez-Olgu\u00edn set the trial for March, but the company urgently needs the valuable Warner assets to better compete against tech behemoths. And beginning Oct. 1, Paramount must increase its payout to Warner Bros. Discovery shareholders by $7 million a day, so-called ticking fees that will heap more debt onto the highly leveraged transaction. <\/p>\n Paramount asked the judge to require California and other plaintiff states, including Nevada, Oregon and New York, along with the Writers Guild of America (which also sued<\/a>) to post a $1.88-billion bond<\/a> that could compensate Paramount for ticking fee costs. A hearing is set for Sept. 24. <\/p>\n For weeks, Paramount’s most potent weapon has been its in-the-works plan to leave L.A. <\/p>\n Lobbying has been intense, prompting a parade of politicians led by Gov. Gavin Newsom, L.A. Mayor Karen Bass and gubernatorial nominee Xavier Becerra to urge the two sides to settle the lawsuit. <\/p>\n “It’s a game of chicken,” Kevin Klowden, an economist and managing director at the Melcene Advisory firm, said in an interview. “But I’m not dismissing the threat because it is very real.” <\/p>\n Read more: How L.A. stopped being Hollywood’s leading star<\/a> <\/p>\n Relocating from Los Angeles would allow Ellison’s cash-hungry media company to qualify for lucrative tax incentives offered by another state. Ellison’s short list includes Tennessee, Texas and Georgia. But leaving its longtime home would be costly for Paramount too, given how much of the talent and deal-making remains concentrated around L.A. <\/p>\n Tennessee’s Department of Economic and Community Development declined to discuss its negotiations with Paramount, but in a statement a spokesperson said the state “remains committed to working with companies across a wide range of industries that are exploring opportunities to invest and grow in Tennessee.” <\/p>\n Early this month, a pro-merger group was set to hold a news conference outside Paramount, but it moved its gathering to a warehouse a few blocks away after anti-merger activists planned a counterprotest. <\/p>\n The pro-merger organization, Neighbors for Strong Communities<\/a>, was incorporated in Washington, D.C., in June and has lobbed text messages to Californians urging them to press Bonta to drop the case. <\/p>\n Speakers were concerned with just one issue: What would happen should Paramount pull out? <\/p>\n “What are we going to do with all these people who have invested their lives and many generations into building something here?” asked Keyla Wood, who moved from Mexico to L.A. about a decade ago after getting her start in Spanish-language soap operas. <\/p>\n “It’s been one thing after the other: The pandemic, the strikes and then it was the fires,” said Wood, who has worked as a stand-in for Eva Longoria and Salma Hayek. “So many people never work again.” <\/p>\n L.A.’s very identity is at stake, added Daniela Kelly, an actor and dancer who arrived from Brazil two decades ago. <\/p>\n “Everyone in the world sees Los Angeles and Hollywood as the platform for their dreams,” Kelly said. “Imagine if a huge studio with 100 years of history here just leaves? What will we be?” <\/p>\n Businesses like Kelly’s small Kreashen Studios USA, which provides video and podcasting space in Marina del Rey, depends on the region’s entertainment economy. <\/p>\n “It’s difficult financially right now to keep open,” she said. “So I’m pro having Paramount stay because this is the center, the heart of Hollywood.” <\/p>\n Read more: California AG Bonta open to Warner Bros. settlement talks if Paramount ‘stops playing games’<\/a> <\/p>\n But deal opponents and some experts say the merger would actually worsen L.A.’s already bleak production picture. <\/p>\n Paramount has promised to cut $6 billion in expenses \u2014 a figure that doesn’t factor in the cost of ticking fees, which would add $650 million each quarter to the $81 billion that Paramount had anticipated paying Warner shareholders. <\/p>\n “We’ve seen from previous mergers that jobs have been lost,” L.A. City Councilmember Adrin Nazarian said at a City Hall event recently. <\/p>\n Combining Paramount and Warner could result in the elimination of nearly 4,500 positions over three years and put at risk an additional 5,865 jobs within businesses that serve the studios, according to an August report by the Los Angeles County Department of Economic Opportunity.<\/a> <\/p>\n “When you look at the economic impact, it’s pretty staggering,” Kelly LoBianco, the department director, said in a recent interview. “An estimated $4 billion in economic output lost, and another $550 million lost in tax revenue at the local, state and federal level.” <\/p>\n The merger also could erase $79 million in tax revenue to Los Angeles County even if Paramount stays in L.A., she said. <\/p>\n But state and county tax revenue would plummet further should Paramount dispatch hundreds of its workers to Tennessee or some other state, Klowden said. <\/p>\n “If Ellison moves all the management out and all of the productions out, you’re talking about potentially tens of thousands of jobs,” Klowden said. “That, bluntly, isn’t just devastating to L.A. That becomes devastating to everybody.” <\/p>\n A report commissioned by Paramount from Los Angeles Economic Development Corp. predicted even steeper losses of at least 28,000 jobs should the studio move its entire operation out of state, according to a draft report given to Politico. <\/p>\n Under a less dire scenario, Paramount could shift its corporate headquarters to another state to qualify for incentives but still maintain large staffs in the creative hubs of Los Angeles and New York, where the company has its legal headquarters. <\/p>\n When the Ellison family acquired Paramount from the Sumner Redstone family last year, Ellison shifted operations to L.A., where he and other key executives work on the Melrose Avenue lot. <\/p>\n The threat to pull up stakes has created a disconnect after Ellison has spent more than a year touting how his family’s growing collection of media properties would strengthen traditional Hollywood. <\/p>\n The relocation campaign echoes a tactic used by software giant Oracle Corp., co-founded by Ellison’s billionaire father, Larry Ellison. For three decades, Oracle thrived in Redwood City, Calif., but in 2020, the company moved its headquarters to Austin, Texas<\/a>, joining other California tech firms leaving in protest of the state’s high taxes. <\/p>\n The elder Ellison announced in 2024 that Oracle would be moving again, this time to Nashville, although that relocation hasn’t been finalized. <\/p>\n Read more: California cancels mediation session for the Paramount-Warner Bros. Discovery deal<\/a> <\/p>\n Paramount would risk leaving behind a skilled talent pool filled with experienced production workers and entertainment executives, Klowden said. <\/p>\n Fleeing L.A. could prompt “a talent bleed-out,” Klowden said. “Creative types are like: ‘Would I feel comfortable moving there?’ And, ‘What if I move there and something goes wrong? There would be nowhere else for me to go.'” <\/p>\n He pointed to Nissan’s 2006 U.S. headquarters move to the Nashville area from Gardena in L.A.’s South Bay<\/a>, which dramatically reset the automaker’s workforce as fewer than half of its Southern California employees made the trek to Tennessee. <\/p>\n On Friday, a magistrate judge told both sides to identify dates in late October to meet for court-ordered settlement talks. <\/p>\n Each has motivations to settle \u2014 including avoiding a years-long court fight. Bonta has said Paramount must be willing to part with assets to alleviate market concentration, which could lead to a sale of Warner’s New Line Cinema, which has rights to “The Lord of the Rings” and “The Conjuring” franchises, and potentially cable channels such as CNN, Food Network or Cartoon Network. <\/p>\n Paramount, as part of a settlement, could abandon plans to leave L.A. <\/p>\n “All of the parties need to understand what this [issue] means to workers and small businesses,” Zbur, the local Assembly member, said. “I’m hopeful for a settlement that assures that Paramount and Warner Bros. will maintain their operations and remain a significant economic and employment force in Los Angeles.” <\/p>\n Read more: The 6 best movies we saw at the 2026 Telluride Film Festival<\/a> <\/p>\n Times staff writer Cerys Davies contributed to this report. <\/p>\n<\/a> David Ellison is deciding whether to leave Hollywood. (Bloomberg via Getty Images) <\/p>\n