{"id":469007,"date":"2026-09-19T11:22:22","date_gmt":"2026-09-19T11:22:22","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/469007\/"},"modified":"2026-09-19T11:22:22","modified_gmt":"2026-09-19T11:22:22","slug":"newsom-rejects-roll-back-of-ceqa-exemptions-for-advanced-manufacturing","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/469007\/","title":{"rendered":"Newsom rejects roll back of CEQA exemptions for advanced manufacturing"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>Gov. Gavin Newsom on Friday vetoed legislation that <a class=\"link\" href=\"https:\/\/www.latimes.com\/environment\/story\/2026-09-02\/sweeping-climate-energy-legislation-goes-to-newsoms-desk\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">would have narrowed exemptions<\/a> to the California Environmental Quality Act for advanced manufacturing facilities amid pushback from business and industry groups.<\/p>\n<p><a class=\"link\" href=\"https:\/\/leginfo.legislature.ca.gov\/faces\/billNavClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260SB954\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\">Senate Bill 954<\/a> from state Sen. Catherine Blakespear (D-Encinitas) would have rolled back parts of last year\u2019s <a class=\"link\" href=\"https:\/\/www.latimes.com\/environment\/story\/2025-07-01\/environmental-groups-outraged-by-newsom-overhaul-ceqa\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">controversial overhaul of CEQA<\/a>, which fast-tracked approvals for a broad array of housing and infrastructure projects in an effort to ease new construction in the state. <\/p>\n<p>Critics said the overhaul opened up a path for advanced manufacturing facilities such as strip miners, chemical producers, battery recyclers and semiconductor plants to open in communities without any environmental review. Dozens of environmental groups including the Sierra Club, the Natural Resources Defense Council and California Environmental Voters <a class=\"link\" href=\"https:\/\/www.nrdc.org\/sites\/default\/files\/2026-09\/ca-sb-954-ceo-letter.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\">urged the governor<\/a> to sign the legislation into law, arguing that it would have provided essential protections for communities that already experience the worst pollution from industrial facilities.<\/p>\n<p>In his <a class=\"link\" href=\"https:\/\/www.gov.ca.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/09\/Veto-Message-SB-954.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\">veto message<\/a>, Newsom said last year\u2019s CEQA reform was a \u201clong overdue overhaul to get California building again.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>\u201cWhile I appreciate the author\u2019s stated intent to ensure these reforms do not result in unintended adverse impacts on the environment, this bill does not merely clarify or refine the existing exemption. It repeals the CEQA exemption for advanced manufacturing facilities,\u201d the governor wrote. \u201cFurther, the bill\u2019s numerous new siting, operational, and emissions requirements would make the narrower exemption impractical for many of the projects it was intended to support.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>In a statement, Blakespear said she was disappointed in the  decision. While some of the new CEQA exemptions are important to stimulate construction, the recent <a class=\"link\" href=\"https:\/\/www.latimes.com\/environment\/story\/2026-05-27\/garden-grove-crises-exposes-southern-californias-hidden-industrial-risks\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">near-miss chemical disaster in Garden Grove <\/a>\u2014 which prompted thousands of evacuations in May \u2014 illustrates the danger that can come from siting advanced manufacturing facilities in communities, she said. <\/p>\n<p>\u201cWe should not have to wait for another emergency before recognizing that sweeping \u2014 and rushed \u2014 exemptions from environmental review need reasonable guardrails,\u201d Blakespear said. \u201cProtecting communities and workers is not an impediment to economic growth; it is part of responsible growth. We need guardrails to these CEQA exemptions to safeguard Californians and ensure the environment isn\u2019t damaged.\u201d <\/p>\n<p>Newsom\u2019s veto came amid pushback from industry groups and prominent business organizations including the California Chamber of Commerce and the California Manufacturers &amp; Technology Assn. The California Department of Finance also was opposed to the bill, which it described in an <a class=\"link\" href=\"https:\/\/leganalysis.dof.ca.gov\/getPdf\/15972\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\">analysis<\/a> as \u201cinconsistent with Administration policy.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Lance Hastings, chief executive of the California Manufacturers &amp; Technology Assn., said in a statement Friday that the governor\u2019s veto protects \u201cthe ability of manufacturers to innovate and create here in California.\u201d <\/p>\n<p>Manufacturing generates $382 billion a year for California and supports 1.24 million jobs, he said. <\/p>\n<p>But opponents said Newsom\u2019s decision ultimately will endanger communities and leave more people exposed to industrial hazards. <\/p>\n<p>\u201cFrontline communities across California continue to face consequences from polluting industries that have damaged our air and water for the sake of corporate profit,\u201d said Asha Sharma, deputy director at the nonprofit Sierra Club California. \u201cSB 954 was developed to ensure those same mistakes do not continue.\u201d <\/p>\n<p>Blakespear said she will continue working on the issue next year.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Gov. Gavin Newsom on Friday vetoed legislation that would have narrowed exemptions to the California Environmental Quality Act&hellip;\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":469008,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[27],"tags":[150182,177641,184635,92780,89503,179,184637,943,102556,48,52,51,7036,47,50,49,3290,1459,112257,3287,184636],"class_list":["post-469007","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-los-angeles","tag-advanced-manufacturing","tag-blakespear","tag-california-building","tag-california-manufacturers","tag-ceqa-exemption","tag-community","tag-controversial-overhaul","tag-governor","tag-industry-group","tag-la","tag-la-headlines","tag-la-news","tag-last-year","tag-los-angeles","tag-los-angeles-headlines","tag-los-angeles-news","tag-newsom","tag-part","tag-pushback","tag-senate-bill","tag-veto-message"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/469007","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=469007"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/469007\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/469008"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=469007"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=469007"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=469007"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}