\u201cMost songbirds migrate at night,\u201d Kelsey said. \u201cIn many species the young make their first trip south without their parents. They navigate with two tools: They learn the rotation of the stars, and researchers believe a light-sensitive reaction in their eyes lets them detect Earth\u2019s magnetic field, a built-in compass calibrated to the cycle of day and night.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cWhen you actually leave lights on, you are actually screwing up both of those systems,\u201d Kelsey said.<\/p>\n
California light pollution map<\/p>\n
To show just how bright California\u2019s night sky has grown, The Bee modeled where skies are brighter at night across the Golden State. This involved dispersing NASA satellite measurements of outward shining light at night and diffusing the light through the atmosphere. Because light scatters as it travels through the sky, being in the vicinity of larger cities can increase light pollution over great distances.<\/p>\n
Approximate light pollution across California. The Sacramento Bee <\/p>\n
The Central Valley\u2019s flatness aids in dispersing light. With no mountains to block it, light pollution carries for hundreds of miles. For this reason, the night sky from Sacramento south to Fresno is not fantastic. Stargazers can improve the view by heading into the Sierra, and it will certainly be worth it if they can venture far and high enough. Even then, the Central Valley\u2019s light will dim the stars more than you might realize. Only at highest peaks of the Sierra can you catch a view that resembles the time before city lights.<\/p>\n
Approximate light pollution in the Sacramento Area. The Sacramento Bee <\/p>\n
Approximate light pollution in the Modesto-Merced area. The Sacramento Bee <\/p>\n
Approximate light pollution across the Fresno area. The Sacramento Bee <\/p>\n
Metropolitan Southern California is also a poor place to stargaze. The light glow there is nearly inescapable even at elevation. Travel far enough east in the Mojave, and the stars will begin to shine as they once did.<\/p>\n
Far Northern California is the true prize. The Klamath mountains, the northern Coast Range, the Shasta highlands, have little light pollution. The only moderately sized city in the area is Redding, and there are plenty of nearby mountains to escape behind and catch the stars. It is one of the reasons these dark sky events at the Dye Creek Preserve, just east of Red Bluff, has been growing more popular.<\/p>\n
\u201cThe big skies are amazing,\u201d said Andrea Craig, the Dye Creek Preserve manager, who arrived in 2006 for a seasonal botany job, fell in love with the land, and stayed.<\/p>\n
Approximate light pollution in the Los Angeles area. The Sacramento Bee <\/p>\n
Approximate light pollution in the Redding area. The Sacramento Bee <\/p>\n
Dark skies as a natural resource<\/p>\n
After Kelsey speaks, the crowd disperses to already set-up array of telescopes. Some are nimble and light, fitting on a hiking backpack with ease. Others are top-of-the-line machines, pointed at distant galaxies millions of light-years away. One is set up to display on a TV for the crowd, showcasing the light from millions of stars and galaxies too dim to see with the naked eye.<\/p>\n
A telescope\u2019s view of the night sky is connected to a monitor at Dye Creek Preserve on Sept. 11. SEAN MACADAY sean.macaday@sacbee.com <\/p>\n
Sydney Chamberlin sees the problem from both ends of the telescope. She trained as an astrophysicist studying gravitational waves and black holes before sidestepping into her current role at The Nature Conservancy, where she directs climate and nature-based solutions projects. Her parents, who met at a planetarium, are in the crowd at Dye Creek.<\/p>\n
\u201cWe don\u2019t really speak a lot about the night sky as a natural resource, but it is,\u201d she said.<\/p>\n
The conservancy doesn\u2019t weigh darkness when deciding what land to protect, Kelsey said. It hasn\u2019t had to. The group targets large, unbroken landscapes where wildlife can roam, and the dark skies often come with them. Dye Creek covers about 35,000 acres, with roughly 100,000 more acres of protected land behind it in national forests. On the horizon, Lassen Peak looms from Lassen Volcanic National Park. Events like this one, he said, are helping make darkness an explicit part of the conservation conversation.<\/p>\n
The fixes are not complicated. Turn lights off at night, shield them so they point at the ground, use red bulbs where light is needed. The conservancy has started to implement these practices at its preserves across the state.<\/p>\n
\u201cThis is a very, very solvable problem,\u201d Kelsey said.<\/p>\n
The night sky over Dye Creek Preserve on Sept 11 as captured by an iPhone. SEAN MACADAY sean.macaday@sacbee.com <\/p>\n
![\"Profile](\"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/09\/1789836972_360_SAC_0014_PK_20260618_MACADAY.jpg\")