{"id":479679,"date":"2026-09-29T20:22:14","date_gmt":"2026-09-29T20:22:14","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/479679\/"},"modified":"2026-09-29T20:22:14","modified_gmt":"2026-09-29T20:22:14","slug":"proposal-1-rewrite-michigans-constitution-heres-how-it-would-work-the-oakland-press","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/479679\/","title":{"rendered":"Proposal 1: Rewrite Michigan\u2019s Constitution? Here\u2019s how it would work \u2013 The Oakland Press"},"content":{"rendered":"

This story was originally published<\/a> by Bridge Michigan, a nonprofit and nonpartisan news organization. Sign up for a free newsletter here.<\/a><\/p>\n

By Jordyn Hermani, Bridge Michigan<\/p>\n

Michigan voters decide whether to rewrite the state constitution later this fall under the statewide ballot question Proposal 1
\nSome see the effort as a way to strip the constitution of recently passed initiatives; others say it\u2019s a way around Lansing gridlock
\nWhat a constitutional convention would look like, however, and who could serve as a delegate is vague under the current constitution<\/p>\n

Michigan voters will decide in November whether to rewrite the state Constitution, a chance they automatically get every 16 years.<\/p>\n

If approved, Proposal 1<\/a> would trigger the first constitutional convention in more than 65 years.<\/p>\n

But what would that look like, and how would it work? Some fear a Pandora\u2019s box of possibilities, while others see it as a means to address structural problems in state government and cut through political noise.<\/p>\n

Most everyone agrees the process could be complicated: Voters would elect 148 delegates to the convention.<\/p>\n

Those delegates would then meet and decide on what should be added \u2014 or removed \u2014 from the current constitution before their proposed rewrite goes back to voters for potential approval in the next statewide election.<\/p>\n

What\u2019s not clear? How often delegates would meet, what they\u2019d be paid and most importantly, what changes they\u2019d ultimately propose making to the Michigan Constitution.<\/p>\n

\u201cIn practice, it would be a whole lot of things happening in a very short amount of time,\u201d said Eric Lupher, president of the Citizens Research Council of Michigan, which has published a series of in-depth reports<\/a> on the prospect of a constitutional convention.<\/p>\n

Here\u2019s what you need to know.<\/p>\n

Trojan horse or voter empowerment?<\/p>\n

Since adopting the current Michigan Constitution in 1963, voters have approved several amendments to the governing document but repeatedly rejected convening a convention for a full rewrite.<\/p>\n

Just 33% of voters<\/a> \u2014 or about 983,000 Michiganders \u2014 approved the proposal last time it was on the ballot in 2010. That was an all-time high.<\/p>\n

Recent polling<\/a> suggests there may be more interest this time around, but several well-known groups in Michigan are urging a \u201cno\u201d vote and warning delegates could try to remove popular constitutional protections.<\/p>\n

\u201cWe see it as a dangerous Trojan horse that can roll out the welcome mat for wealthy special interests and the very same corporations that we\u2019re also concerned have been buying our elections,\u201d said Christy McGillivray, executive director of Voters Not Politicians.<\/p>\n

The nonprofit advocacy group is part of a bipartisan coalition called Protect MI Constitution from Special Interests<\/a> that is opposing the ballot measure. It includes dozens of organizations from across the political spectrum, including the Michigan Catholic Conference, chambers of commerce, pro- and anti-abortion organizations, unions and business groups.<\/p>\n

While there is no official \u201cyes\u201d campaign, there are some who see merit in the idea of calling a constitutional convention.<\/p>\n

\u201cThere\u2019s this unholy alliance of Lansing swamp creatures who are opposed to it \u2014 but normal Michiganders seem to support it,\u201d said Dennis Lennox, a Republican political consultant who led an unsuccessful vote-yes effort in 2010.<\/p>\n

According to Lennox, ordinary Michiganders share common ground on various topics, such as data centers and increasing property taxes, which enjoy expanding bipartisan agreement. However, he maintains that minimal progress occurs on these issues due to Lansing and the heavily funded special interest groups operating there.<\/p>\n

With a constitutional convention, he said, anything could be on the table.<\/p>\n

\u201cSomething needs to change in Michigan,\u201d Lennox added, \u201cbecause the Michigan of 2026 is not the Michigan of 1961 and 1962, when the last Constitution was written.\u201d<\/p>\n

Selecting convention delegates<\/p>\n

If voters approve Proposal 1 this fall, it would begin what could be a lengthy process.<\/p>\n

That means partisan primary elections to nominate delegates to the constitutional convention, followed by a general election by mid-2027. Voters would ultimately select 148 delegates \u2014 one for each state House and state Senate district.<\/p>\n

\"StephenStephen Nisbet, the president of Michigan\u2019s last constitutional convention, after signing the new draft constitution Aug. 1, 1962. Convention secretary Fred Chase is about to sign. (Courtesy of Eugene G Wanger Collection, Archives of Michigan)<\/p>\n

Following their election, delegates would convene in Lansing by Oct. 5, 2027, or \u201can earlier date if provided by law,\u201d according to the current Michigan Constitution. Delegates would then choose convention officers, determine the rules of the convention and hire staff. The Legislature would decide how much they\u2019re paid.<\/p>\n

Could one political party control the convention? It\u2019s possible, as there is no requirement in the current Constitution for partisan balance.<\/p>\n

In 1961, the state\u2019s last constitutional convention, there were 99 Republican delegates and 45 Democrats, according to state records<\/a>.<\/p>\n

A 2027 convention would likely be more evenly split. Currently, 76 Republicans and 72 Democrats represent the state House and Senate districts that would be used to elect delegates.<\/p>\n

Lupher, with the Citizens Research Council, believes conflict of interest laws<\/a> would prohibit current state lawmakers from serving as delegates to the constitutional convention. Others, like Lennox, say that may not be the case because delegate qualifications aren\u2019t clearly spelled out in the state Constitution.<\/p>\n

How long would it take?<\/p>\n

The current Constitution does not limit how long the convention could last, how often or where delegates would meet, or how they would decide on what should or should not make it into a new Constitution.<\/p>\n

What it does require, however, is that Michigan voters get a say on the proposed constitutional rewrite \u201cnot less than 90 days after final adjournment of the convention.\u201d<\/p>\n

What the Michigan Constitution says:\u00a0<\/p>\n

General revision of constitution; submission of question, convention delegates and meeting.\u00a0<\/p>\n

Sec. 3. At the general election to be held in the year 1978, and in each 16th year thereafter and at such times as may be provided by law, the question of a general revision of the constitution shall be submitted to the electors of the state. If a majority of the electors voting on the question decide in favor of a convention for such purpose, at an election to be held not later than six months after the proposal was certified as approved, the electors of each representative district as then organized shall elect one delegate and the electors of each senatorial district as then organized shall elect one delegate at a partisan election. The delegates so elected shall convene at the seat of government on the first Tuesday in October next succeeding such election or at an earlier date if provided by law.<\/p>\n

Convention officers, rules, membership, personnel, publications.<\/p>\n

The convention shall choose its own officers, determine the rules of its proceedings and judge the qualifications, elections and returns of its members. To fill a vacancy in the office of any delegate, the governor shall appoint a qualified resident of the same district who shall be a member of the same party as the delegate vacating the office. The convention shall have power to appoint such officers, employees and assistants as it deems necessary and to fix their compensation; to provide for the printing and distribution of its documents, journals and proceedings; to explain and disseminate information about the proposed constitution and to complete the business of the convention in an orderly manner. Each delegate shall receive for his services compensation provided by law.<\/p>\n

Submission of proposed constitution or amendment.\u00a0<\/p>\n

No proposed constitution or amendment adopted by such convention shall be submitted to the electors for approval as hereinafter provided unless by the assent of a majority of all the delegates elected to and serving in the convention, with the names and vote of those voting entered in the journal. Any proposed constitution or amendments adopted by such convention shall be submitted to the qualified electors in the manner and at the time provided by such convention not less than 90 days after final adjournment of the convention. Upon the approval of such constitution or amendments by a majority of the qualified electors voting thereon the constitution or amendments shall take effect as provided by the convention.<\/p>\n

In 1961, delegates worked for an estimated 500 hours between Oct. 3 and Aug. 1 of that year, according to state records<\/a>.<\/p>\n

Delegates made more than 800 proposals, some of which could\u2019ve resulted in a drastically different form of state government. Failed ideas included a unicameral legislature, giving state Supreme Court justices geographic districts and banning absentee voters from participating in state elections.<\/p>\n

It could cost the state about $80 million to hold a constitutional convention, according to a preliminary estimate from the nonpartisan Senate Fiscal Agency. That would cover the pay for delegates and staff, along with the cost of printing and distributing any associated documents, or journals related to the proposed Constitution, among other things.<\/p>\n

But funding a convention would require legislation, says state Sen. Jonathan Lindsey, R-Coldwater, who\u2019s currently reviewing the 1960s-era bills that enabled that year\u2019s constitutional convention in order to be prepared in case voters approve the effort this fall.<\/p>\n

Lindsey, who says he\u2019ll be voting yes on Proposal 1, says his initial focus is \u201cjust on the election processes for the delegates,\u201d such as outlining how the elections would take place. Some questions, he added, may need to be resolved by way of an attorney general opinion.<\/p>\n

\u201cThe future elements that I would be interested in working on are making sure the resources are there through appropriations, but also any other guardrails that need to come,\u201d Lindsey added, mentioning the need for possible campaign finance disclosure or conflict-of-interest rules for campaigning delegates.<\/p>\n

What changes could be made?<\/p>\n

Anything, technically, is up for grabs once a constitutional convention is called.<\/p>\n

That\u2019s a concern for some, including McGillivray, who warn that delegates could remove voter-approved amendments to the current Constitution, like abortion rights, the Independent Citizens Redistricting Commission, no-reason absentee voting and early in-person voting.<\/p>\n

In recent weeks, state Rep. Jay DeBoyer \u2014 the running mate of Republican gubernatorial candidate John James \u2014 floated the idea of using a constitutional convention to repeal Proposal 3 of 2022<\/a>, which amended the Michigan Constitution to ensure abortion access.<\/p>\n

\u201cSometimes, you have to say to yourself, \u2018This might be our only way,’\u201d DeBoyer said, according to a recording published by The Detroit News<\/a> that he later attempted to walk back.<\/p>\n

\"BridgeBridge Michigan<\/p>\n

Right to Life of Michigan, which opposes legal abortion, announced it is against calling a constitutional convention. President Amber Roseboom argued it is wrong to suggest \u201cthat abortion is on the ballot\u201d in November.<\/p>\n

But state Senate Majority Leader Winnie Brinks \u2014 the running mate of Democratic gubernatorial nominee Jocelyn Benson \u2014 has said DeBoyer\u2019s comments show Republicans could try to use a convention to \u201cerode things that have passed with popular support in recent years.\u201d<\/p>\n

Voters should \u201cunderstand that the things that they have worked for over the last decade or so are at risk if we let the Republicans fool us into putting this on the table and opening it up,\u201d Brinks said.<\/p>\n

Lennox, the Republican political consultant, noted that anything changed via constitutional convention would still need to be approved by voters in a statewide election.<\/p>\n

\u201cThe idea that any delegate would want to touch a subject that the people have in recent years overwhelmingly voted for is crazy,\u201d he told Bridge.<\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"This story was originally published by Bridge Michigan, a nonprofit and nonpartisan news organization. Sign up for a…\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":479680,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[34],"tags":[181,1071,795,16663,100,143,145,144,13],"class_list":["post-479679","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-oakland","tag-latest-headlines","tag-local-government","tag-michigan","tag-michigan-news","tag-news","tag-oakland","tag-oakland-headlines","tag-oakland-news","tag-politics"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/479679","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=479679"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/479679\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/479680"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=479679"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=479679"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=479679"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}