{"id":501781,"date":"2026-10-20T04:04:11","date_gmt":"2026-10-20T04:04:11","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/501781\/"},"modified":"2026-10-20T04:04:11","modified_gmt":"2026-10-20T04:04:11","slug":"california-billionaire-tax-could-leave-state-with-less-revenue-stanford-study-cautions","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/501781\/","title":{"rendered":"California billionaire tax could leave state with less revenue, Stanford study cautions"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>California voters next month will decide on whether to <a href=\"https:\/\/www.cbsnews.com\/news\/proposition-40-californias-proposed-billionaire-tax-how-does-it-add-up\/\" target=\"_blank\" data-invalid-url-rewritten-http=\"\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\">tax billionaire wealth<\/a>, a proposal designed to generate billions of dollars to shore up the state&#8217;s healthcare system. But Stanford economists are now cautioning that the tax could backfire, leaving the state with less in tax revenue than before.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>Seven billionaires have already publicly moved out of California, removing about $540 billion, or 30%, of the state&#8217;s total billionaire wealth from potential taxation, according to Stanford University economists Benjamin Jaros and Joshua Rauh in a <a href=\"https:\/\/www.nber.org\/system\/files\/working_papers\/w35899\/w35899.pdf?utm_campaign=PANTHEON_STRIPPED&amp;amp%3Butm_medium=PANTHEON_STRIPPED&amp;amp%3Butm_source=PANTHEON_STRIPPED\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener nofollow\">new working paper<\/a> published by the National Bureau of Economic Research. The billionaires who have left the state include venture capitalist Peter Thiel and Google co-founders Larry Page and Sergey Brin.<\/p>\n<p>Because additional billionaires have likely quietly moved since the tax proposal was announced, the measure may ultimately generate only about $30 billion, far less than the $100 billion estimated by its proponents, the economists said. If enacted, the tax would apply a one-time 5% state tax on billionaire wealth.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>To be sure, $30 billion is still a sizable amount of new tax revenue. But future income tax losses from those billionaire departures could more than offset that windfall, the economists calculated.<\/p>\n<p>California could lose roughly $1 billion to $3.5 billion a year in income tax revenue due to its shrinking billionaire population, the paper&#8217;s authors estimated. If those losses persist permanently, their value in today&#8217;s dollars would exceed the wealth tax proceeds by about $39 billion, the economists said.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;These findings suggest that the Billionaire Tax Act will not fulfill the primary functions for which it was designed,&#8221; Jaros and Rauh wrote. &#8220;Although the Act was designed to raise revenue, behavioral response prior to voting has eroded most of the projected tax base.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>The Service Employees International Union-United Healthcare Workers West (SEIU-UHW), a healthcare worker union that introduced the ballot measure, refuted the research.<\/p>\n<p>The proposition&#8217;s &#8220;sole purpose is to ensure that billionaires finally pay their fair share to prevent a collapse of California&#8217;s healthcare system,&#8221; Debru Carthan, vice president, SEIU-UHW, said in a statement to CBS News. &#8220;And Californians like me are seeing right through these misinformation campaigns.&#8221;\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>The tax would replace cuts to healthcare spending introduced in the Republicans&#8217; One Big Beautiful Bill tax and spending law, allowing millions of Californians &#8220;to keep their healthcare while preventing their premiums from skyrocketing,&#8221; Carthan said.<\/p>\n<p>Other economists have come to different conclusions about the tax. Economists including Daron Acemoglu of MIT and Joseph Stiglitz of Columbia University, both Nobel Prize winners, have <a href=\"https:\/\/gabriel-zucman.eu\/files\/prop40letter.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener nofollow\">signed their support<\/a> for the measure, pointing out that California has attracted more venture funding since the wealth tax was announced.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;What will allow California to thrive in the future is not letting a handful of billionaires live tax free: it is adequate public spending on health, education and public infrastructure, key engines of economic growth to which it is only fair to ask the ultra-wealthy to contribute,&#8221; they wrote in a September letter of support for the tax.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>Ahead of the vote on the ballot measure, called\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/calmatters.org\/california-voter-guide-2026\/proposition-40-billionaire-tax\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener nofollow\">Proposition 40<\/a>, voters in California are apparently divided on the tax. About 46% of likely voters say they favor Proposition 40, while 43% are opposed, according to a <a href=\"https:\/\/www.politico.com\/f\/?id=000001a1-471e-dc9a-a9a3-5f7e57680000\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener nofollow\">new poll <\/a>from Citrin-Politico.<\/p>\n<p>Dave Regan, the leader of the union that introduced the measure, told CBS News&#8217; Jo Ling Kent that he&#8217;s &#8220;pretty confident&#8221; the tax will pass.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;There&#8217;s never been a proposal like this anywhere in the world, so it&#8217;s a novel idea,&#8221; Regan said. &#8220;We are facing an emergency.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p class=\"content__meta--editors\">\n      Edited by<\/p>\n<p>                                  <a href=\"https:\/\/www.cbsnews.com\/team\/stephen-smith\/\" class=\"byline__author__link\" data-invalid-url-rewritten-http=\"\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Stephen  Smith<\/a>\n                      <\/p>\n<p>\n          More from CBS News\n        <\/p>\n<p>\n              Go deeper with The Free Press\n            <\/p>\n<p class=\"content__tags__label\">In:<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"California voters next month will decide on whether to tax billionaire wealth, a proposal designed to generate billions&hellip;\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":501782,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[6],"tags":[7,9,8,1694],"class_list":["post-501781","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-california","tag-california","tag-california-headlines","tag-california-news","tag-taxes"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/501781","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=501781"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/501781\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/501782"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=501781"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=501781"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=501781"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}