{"id":505449,"date":"2026-10-23T15:16:08","date_gmt":"2026-10-23T15:16:08","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/505449\/"},"modified":"2026-10-23T15:16:08","modified_gmt":"2026-10-23T15:16:08","slug":"california-republicans-pushing-new-voter-id-law-motivated-by-trumps-stolen-election-fantasies","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/505449\/","title":{"rendered":"California Republicans pushing new voter ID law motivated by Trump’s ‘stolen election’ fantasies"},"content":{"rendered":"

Supporters of Proposition 39<\/a>, the statewide ballot initiative that would implement additional Voter ID requirements for California elections, pitch the measure as a “common-sense reform to increase trust and participation in our elections.” Its sponsor, Assembly member Carl DeMaio (R\u2013San Diego), touts widespread support for such measures by Democratic, Republican, and independent voters.<\/p>\n

Yet the latest polls show the measure tanking, with a Public Policy Institute of California survey<\/a> last month showing it losing 55 percent to 43 percent\u2014dismal numbers this late in the election season. The official ballot arguments<\/a> provide some insight into the reasons. While supporters stick with their “nonpartisan” shtick, opponents tie the measure to President Donald Trump’s election denialism.<\/p>\n

“Stop Trump from rigging our elections. Don’t believe the lies. Prop. 39 MAKES VOTING HARDER, MORE EXPENSIVE, AND LESS SAFE for Californians,” per the “no” argument. It refers to the measure’s funding from “MAGA rightwing billionaires.” That point was reinforced by a recent CalMatters report<\/a> showing large donations from “deep-pocketed Republican donors.” The publication says it’s a “signal that conservatives view Prop. 39 as a test of support for future battleground states in the broader push by\u2026Trump to tighten voter restrictions.”<\/p>\n

That’s a fair assessment. In a Democratic state where the president’s approval ratings<\/a> are 24 percent in one poll, it’s hard to imagine that most voters will spend much time thinking about the ins and outs of election policy and analyze the measure based on its specifics. They’ll no doubt see it for what it largely is: a Republican Party effort to aid and abet Trump’s unfounded election conspiracies. That said, its requirements aren’t overly obtrusive, only unnecessary.<\/p>\n

Currently, Californians must show a state identification or provide the last four digits of their Social Security Number when registering. No identification is needed to vote in person, but election officials use signature verification for vote-by-mail envelopes. Around 90 percent of Californians vote that way, so the main issue involves the requirement that voters add the last four digits from their government IDs on the outside of the envelope\u2014thus adding an additional checkpoint<\/a> (and sadly an additional opportunity for identity theft).<\/p>\n

There’s no need to worry about compliance costs<\/a> for election agencies, as it’s their job to administer elections. The measure likely will marginally reduce voter participation (by increasing disqualified ballots, even from legal voters if they forgot the ID they used when they registered), while marginally increasing security. It would force many Californians to re-register<\/a>, which is a hassle. It would no doubt burden our excruciatingly slow ballot counting.<\/p>\n

I don’t have any theoretical problem with requiring an identification before voting, but California’s elections are remarkably secure. There’s no evidence of widespread fraud. Basically no one risks prison time by pretending to be someone else on a ballot<\/a>. It’s not about fixing a problem.<\/p>\n

Since his defeat in 2020, Trump has traded in election conspiracy theories. The new GOP game is to trot out evidence-free election-fraud claims whenever they lose. We shouldn’t play along. Despite the nonpartisan rhetoric, Proposition 39 is the state GOP’s way of leaning into Trump’s priorities and, as that CalMatters article noted<\/a>, build momentum for less-defensible nationwide restrictions\u2014apparently the only way Republicans think they can build a lasting majority. The measure won’t do much damage in California as it’s fairly modest, but it energizes the party’s worst instincts.<\/p>\n

Consider what DeMaio wrote in 2024 about his seven-point plan<\/a> to overhaul the state GOP: “Do you remember a time when Republicans controlled a majority of statewide offices in California and were competitive in the state Legislature and congressional delegations?” He rightly blames the party itself, then offers his first item on a platform to revive it: “Make election integrity CAGOP’s top ballot priority.” I, too, would prefer more competitive California elections, but my first point would be for the GOP to make a better case for fixing California’s messes.<\/p>\n

Others see the measure as a means to gin up Republican turnout for a November election that’s going to be a referendum on Trump by giving them some high-excitement issue to rally around. But some savvy political observers<\/a> think that it might backfire. We’ll see, but it reminds me that the California GOP has too long relied on cute strategies rather than good candidates.<\/p>\n

What about supporters’ main claim that Voter ID is necessary because it will restore voters’ flagging trust in election integrity? Well, Republicans are the ones who don’t trust our elections\u2014and that’s precisely because Trump spent the last six years poisoning the well. Do you really believe the people who think MAGA Republican Spencer Pratt could have only lost a Los Angeles mayoral primary (where only 15.9 percent of voters<\/a> are Republicans) because of fraud will have their faith restored if Proposition 39 becomes law? Doubtful.<\/p>\n

Republicans can restore their fortunes by acting normal again. The rest of us needn’t enable them by backing a measure based on an election-integrity fantasy.<\/p>\n

This column was first published<\/a> in The Orange County Register.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Supporters of Proposition 39, the statewide ballot initiative that would implement additional Voter ID requirements for California elections,…\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":505450,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[6],"tags":[12875,7,9,8,536,35072,15180,54524],"class_list":["post-505449","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-california","tag-ballot-initiatives","tag-california","tag-california-headlines","tag-california-news","tag-donald-trump","tag-election-2026","tag-republican-party","tag-voter-id"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/505449","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=505449"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/505449\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/505450"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=505449"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=505449"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=505449"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}