{"id":519831,"date":"2026-11-05T21:32:09","date_gmt":"2026-11-05T21:32:09","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/519831\/"},"modified":"2026-11-05T21:32:09","modified_gmt":"2026-11-05T21:32:09","slug":"meta-and-social-media-companies-sue-california-over-new-restrictions","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/519831\/","title":{"rendered":"Meta and social media companies sue California over new restrictions"},"content":{"rendered":"<p> The lawsuit is the latest legal challenge over California\u2019s social media restrictions.  <\/p>\n<p>Technology companies Google, Meta and Tik Tok sued the state of California on Wednesday to block a new law that restricts companies from targeting children younger than  16 with \u201caddictive\u201d social media content that can keep them scrolling for hours. <\/p>\n<p>Assembly Bill 1709, introduced by Assemblymember Josh Lowenthal (D-Long Beach), bars social media sites from providing features such as autoplay and recommended content displays to teenagers and young children. <\/p>\n<p>The social media companies, which filed separate lawsuits in federal court, cited their  1st Amendment right to free speech and the Communications Decency Act, which protects online platforms from being sued over content posted by third parties. Meta Platforms, as well as Google and YouTube, filed lawsuits in the Northern District of California. TikTok filed in the Central District.<\/p>\n<p>California\u2019s attempt to \u201cappoint the State as the editor, curator and controller of online speech\u201d and \u201coverride Meta\u2019s editorial judgment about how to curate and display these billions of posts of third-party speech,\u201d violates the U.S. Constitution, attorneys for Meta wrote in its lawsuit. The technology company owns Instagram, Facebook and Threads.<\/p>\n<p>A representative for Atty. Gen.  Rob Bonta said his office was reviewing the litigation.<\/p>\n<p>The legal action follows successful lawsuits brought against the tech giants by California and others that have resulted in massive civil settlements. At the same time, the tech industry continues to file legal challenges to block state efforts to rein in  social media companies.<\/p>\n<p>Lowenthal said earlier this year he was inspired to seek more safeguards for social media users, citing the anxiety and depression among children who grew up with access to cellphones, tablets and computer screens.<\/p>\n<p>The addictive nature of autoplay and other features is \u201charmful, full stop, and that they\u2019re not appropriate for the developing brain,\u201d Lowenthal said.<\/p>\n<p>Tech industry groups opposed Lowentha\u2019s bill, arguing it would hamper users\u2019 ability to connect with family and friends. <\/p>\n<p>Meta and others sued <a class=\"link\" href=\"https:\/\/subscriber.politicopro.com\/article\/2025\/11\/google-youtube-sue-california-over-addictive-social-media-feeds-law-00652353\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\">last year over Senate Bill 976,<\/a> a similar bill known as \u201cProtecting Our Kids from Social Media Addiction Act\u201d that bars addictive feeds and certain features to minors without parental consent. The  9th Circuit Court of Appeals likely will hear arguments in the case next spring, Courthouse News Services <a class=\"link\" href=\"https:\/\/www.courthousenews.com\/judge-wants-california-social-media-addiction-cases-to-move-forward-despite-appeal\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\">reported<\/a> last month.<\/p>\n<p>Both Senate Bill 976 and Assembly Bill 1709 go into effect on Jan. 1.<\/p>\n<p>TikTok, in its lawsuit filed Wednesday, argues that AB 1709 essentially overrides SB 976, preventing a social media site from providing \u201caddictive features,\u201d even if parents consent to  a minor\u2019s use of the features. The company also argued it has restrictions in place to protect teens.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThe consequence is that a parent who has reviewed TikTok\u2019s platform, linked her account to her fifteen-year-old\u2019s account through Family Pairing, set a 30-minute daily screen-limit, enabled Restricted Mode, and concluded that a personalized For You feed introducing her daughter to new musicians and science educators is appropriate for her family has no ability under California law to make that choice,\u201d Tik Tok\u2019s attorneys wrote. \u201cNor does the fifteen-year-old daughter have any say in her online expression.\u201d <\/p>\n<p>California is home to some of the biggest social media companies, who increasingly are facing lawsuits over their products. California was among dozens of states that sued Meta in 2023, alleging it designed harmful and addictive features to hook children while misleading the public about the dangers. Some of the harms included depression, anxiety, addiction and body image issues as young people compare themselves to others on social media.<\/p>\n<p>Meta agreed to pay up to $17 billion and make changes to its Facebook and Instagram platforms, including hiding likes and reactions and blocking teens from using extreme makeup filters. The company also said it would enact a default two-hour daily time limit that teens can turn off only with parental permission, mute notifications during school hours and implement a night access mode that blocks its apps from midnight to 6 a.m.<\/p>\n<p><a class=\"link\" href=\"https:\/\/www.latimes.com\/california\/story\/2026-03-25\/social-media-lawsuit-trial-meta-google-verdict\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">In another landmark case<\/a>, a Los Angeles jury in March found that Instagram and YouTube were responsible for the suffering of a Chico, Calif., woman who charged the platforms were addictive by design. The 20-year-old, who was awarded $6 million damages, said she became hooked on YouTube and Instagram in grade school.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"The lawsuit is the latest legal challenge over California\u2019s social media restrictions. Technology companies Google, Meta and Tik&hellip;\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":519832,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[6],"tags":[3899,7,9,8,3409,1431,5592,7644,3412,199125,1594,199123,106984,199124,225,360,3808],"class_list":["post-519831","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-california","tag-assembly-bill","tag-california","tag-california-headlines","tag-california-news","tag-child","tag-family","tag-feature","tag-instagram","tag-meta","tag-online-platform","tag-other","tag-separate-lawsuit","tag-social-medium-company","tag-social-medium-content","tag-state","tag-teen","tag-tiktok"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/519831","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=519831"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/519831\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/519832"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=519831"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=519831"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=519831"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}