Richard Halsey, director of the California Chaparral Institute, was elated. \u201cChaparral and sage scrub is more than 10% of the state,\u201d he said. <\/p>\n
\u201cDespite all the rhetoric about how we love biodiversity, you\u2019re going to wipe out where most of the biodiversity is in the state,\u201d and in the process make the landscape more flammable, Halsey said of the Cal Fire plan.<\/p>\n
For the record:<\/p>\n
3:38 p.m. Nov. 25, 2025A previous version of this story incorrectly identified the Cal Fire program in dispute. It is the California Vegetation Treatment Program, not the Vegetation Management Program. <\/p>\n
Cal Fire\u2019s Vegetation Treatment Program aims to use prescribed fire plus tree and brush cutting to reduce the risk of a wildfire igniting, exploding out of control and jeopardizing lives and property. In doing so, the agency also tries to nurture the biodiversity of native species and protect clean water and soil health.<\/p>\n
\u201cThe California Vegetation Treatment Program is one critical tool of many to address the state\u2019s catastrophic wildfire crisis,\u201d Tony Andersen, executive officer of the Board of Forestry and Fire Protection, said in a statement. \u201cWe appreciate the months of collaborative work spent with the Chaparral Institute, Endangered Habitats League, and others to find interim solutions that address their feedback.\u201d<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Crews clear a firebreak during the July 2023 Victor blaze in Santa Clarita. <\/p>\n
(Jason Armond \/ Los Angeles Times)<\/p>\n
In California\u2019s conifer forests, this often looks like thinning an unnaturally high density of trees and brush that fuel exceptionally severe fire. <\/p>\n
But in Southern California, much of the wildlands are home to chaparral ecosystems of shrubs, oak trees, native grasses and flowers, and the typical approach is to cut fuel breaks: long strips along ridgelines and roadways devoid of all vegetation that can stop creeping ground fires in their tracks and give firefighters safe access to battle wind-driven blazes that can easily jump.<\/p>\n
Severe and frequent wildfires are already causing some areas with trees to become chaparral and some areas of chaparral to become just flammable grasses. The legal action claimed that Cal Fire\u2019s chaparral firebreaks can cause this \u201ctype conversion<\/a>.\u201d <\/p>\n When native chaparral is cleared from a landscape, whether by a wildfire or through a vegetation management project, it\u2019s often not native plants that grow back, but instead opportunistic fast-growing invasive grasses.<\/p>\n Cal Fire argued that its program addressed this in its environmental impact review. But the California Chaparral Institute and Endangered Habitats League said the department did not take into account that these invasive grasses are much more flammable than the native species it is cutting down \u2014 meaning it could increase fire risk.<\/p>\n The Vegetation TreatmentProgram guides real work on the ground. So far this year it has completed more than 5,400 acres of work on 26 projects. About 13% of the work was in shrublands, like chaparral.<\/p>\n The ecology organizations filed the petition in 2020<\/a>, and in 2023 the San Diego Superior Court ruled for Cal Fire. The organizations appealed, and, in May 2025, California\u2019s 4th District Court of Appeal reversed the trial court and ordered it to determine how to remedy the problem.<\/p>\n On Nov. 14, the lower court ordered Cal Fire to address the potential for type conversion to worsen wildfire risk and until it does so, barred individual projects in the Vegetation Treatment Program from relying on the program\u2019s blanket environmental review to comply with the California Environmental Quality Act.<\/p>\n The order does not apply to new fuel break projects that already have a plan to prevent flammable grasses from growing, nor to maintaining existing fuel breaks. Projects on forestlands and grasslands may also continue unimpeded, as may projects on land that has already lost its trees or chaparral to type conversion. <\/p>\n Ecologists and fire officials ultimately have the same goals: reduce devastating wildfires and protect native biodiversity. After all, fire can wipe out thousands of acres of native ecosystem \u2014 and the non-native ecosystems that plague the region can much more easily ignite.<\/p>\n But ecologists tend to favor solutions preserving native ecosystems (such as programs focused on reducing the chance of fire starting in the first place<\/a>), whereas fire officials tend to gravitate toward solutions that view plants as \u201cfuel\u201d for a potential fire (such as cutting away vegetation to create fuel breaks).<\/p>\n Fire officials argue fuel breaks give crews a much needed strategic advantage when they\u2019re working to protect communities. However, some ecologists question whether breaks even help in ember-driven fires and whether fire departments actually staff fuel breaks during an emergency.<\/p>\n