{"id":84098,"date":"2025-12-06T16:17:05","date_gmt":"2025-12-06T16:17:05","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/84098\/"},"modified":"2025-12-06T16:17:05","modified_gmt":"2025-12-06T16:17:05","slug":"judge-denies-sentence-reduction-for-san-jose-killer-once-on-death-row-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/84098\/","title":{"rendered":"Judge denies sentence reduction for San Jose killer once on death row"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>SAN JOSE \u2014 A Santa Clara County judge on Friday rejected a proposed settlement between prosecutors and convicted murderer Erik Chatman that would have given parole eligibility to the man who once faced the death penalty for viciously stabbing Rosellina LoBue at a San Jose photo kiosk in 1987.<\/p>\n<p>The deal was meant to resolve habeas corpus and Racial Justice Act petitions Chatman filed this year, alleging his trial was plagued by racial bias and misconduct.<\/p>\n<p>While neither side disputed that Chatman killed LoBue \u2014 with his toddler son in tow \u2014 prosecutors moved to settle the case by petitioning the Superior Court to drop a special circumstance allegation of torture Chatman was convicted of in 1993. Under the agreement, Chatman, who was taken off death row last year as part of a <a href=\"https:\/\/www.mercurynews.com\/2024\/08\/10\/families-incensed-as-rollout-of-death-penalty-resentencings-begins-in-santa-clara-county\/\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">landmark resentencing initiative by District Attorney Jeff Rosen<\/a>, would have been resentenced to 25-years-to-life and made parole eligible.<\/p>\n<p>LoBue\u2019s surviving siblings balked at the proposal, saying they were assured last year by Rosen that taking Chatman off death row would still end with him dying in prison. After a Friday court hearing, in which Judge Eric Geffon said approving the agreement exceeded his authority under a 2022 law change, Tony LoBue and his sister Marie audibly exhaled.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cWe feel that finally, the wheels of justice are starting to turn in our favor,\u201d Tony LoBue said outside the courtroom. \u201cI know this isn\u2019t over. We will be fighting every step of the way.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Chatman, now 60 and held in a state prison near Sacramento, filed petitions earlier this year \u2014 unrelated to his earlier resentencing \u2014 alleging that his legal defense was plagued by ineffective counsel, trial misconduct and racial bias; Chatman is half Black. The district attorney\u2019s office settlement proposal sought to head off the challenges and risks of potentially re-trying Chatman, including having to rely on nearly 40-year-old investigative records and the practical effect that the passing of four decades has on witness availability.<\/p>\n<p>Deputy District Attorney Alexandra Gadeberg told Geffon how the murder trial was rife with allusions to racial \u201cstereotypes and tropes\u201d that could arguably have appealed to the all-white jury\u2019s racial prejudices, and could have substantiated violations under the Racial Justice Act of 2020. The <a href=\"https:\/\/www.mercurynews.com\/2025\/02\/24\/overturned-rape-conviction-of-former-49ers-star-was-countys-first-reversal-under-the-racial-justice-act-why-did-it-take-so-long\/\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">South Bay-originated law<\/a> offers legal relief for provable bias in arrests, convictions and sentences, and retroactively applies because Chatman\u2019s case is considered active in light of his appeals.<\/p>\n<p>Chatman\u2019s petitions specifically targeted repeated references at trial about his crack cocaine addiction, including claims that the $500 he took from the cash register after stabbing LoBue 51 times at a Photo Drive-Up near downtown San Jose was spent on buying more of the drug to use with his wife and mother-in-law.<\/p>\n<p>A violation of the RJA, Gadeberg further argued, would vacate the entire conviction \u2014 and the settlement preserved the first-degree murder conviction.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThere is pending litigation that that has raised colorable claims that the Racial Justice Act may have been violated during the trial in the early \u201990s,\u201d Gadeberg said in court before the decision Friday. \u201cBased on the possible risks that come with all litigation, we are electing to resolve the pending litigation by way of a legal stipulation with defense counsel.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Even if Chatman had been granted parole eligibility under the deal, Gadeberg noted that his freedom was no sure thing since he still would have to prove to a parole board that he had rehabilitated to a point where he was longer a public danger. James McManis, a longtime South Bay attorney who appeared in court on behalf of the LoBue family, argued that Chatman would have eventually been freed if Geffon approved the settlement.<\/p>\n<p>Chatman admitted to stabbing Rosellina LoBue, who was 18 and worked with his then-wife at a Photo Drive-Up in San Jose, on Oct. 7, 1987, reportedly after a strained conversation about his personal life. She was stabbed 51 times; authorities said Chatman\u2019s two-and-half-year-old son was on hand when the deadly attack occurred.<\/p>\n<p>Chatman was arrested in 1990 in Houston after being linked to the killing. Later trial testimony established that after the killing, Chatman was seen back home in East Palo Alto with his young son in a bathtub, both of them washing off blood from their bodies.<\/p>\n<p>Before and at Friday\u2019s hearing, McManis argued that the district attorney\u2019s office did not have the legal or \u201cinterest of justice\u201d grounds to further change Chatman\u2019s sentence.<\/p>\n<p>Geffon ultimately sided with McManis and the LoBue family, but cited different legal reasoning, contending that what the prosecution and Chatman\u2019s attorneys were asking for was essentially a pre-conviction plea deal that was mismatched with the current post-conviction status of the case. He added that the racial bias claims were still unproven allegations and granting the petition would be an \u201cextraordinary\u201d use of his power.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThe request to recall the defendant and sentence is denied,\u201d Geffon concluded.<\/p>\n<p>After the hearing, McManis said the judge \u201clistened very carefully, heard all the parties and I think made the correct decision.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>The district attorney\u2019s office also addressed the ruling, saying in a statement, \u201cThe court\u2019s ruling today provides an alternative path for our office to achieve justice by preserving the defendant\u2019s first-degree murder conviction and keeping him in prison where he has remained for the last 35 years.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Chatman was removed from death row last year as part of a policy initiative by Rosen to resentence Santa Clara County\u2019s condemned men to life-without-parole terms. The policy was borne from Rosen\u2019s determination that the death penalty was unjust and that pursuing death penalty cases was impractical given a state moratorium on capital punishment and the literal dismantling of the physical death row at at San Quentin State Prison.<\/p>\n<p>Eleven men were resentenced under the initiative, while a handful declined Rosen\u2019s resentencing offer in order to preserve their appellate rights. One man, Richard Wade Farley, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.mercurynews.com\/2025\/03\/21\/richard-farley-death-penalty-els-workplace-shooting-resentencing\/\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">was denied resentencing relief<\/a> after a judge determined he had not expressed remorse or shown sufficient rehabilitation following his conviction for the infamous 1988 ESL mass shooting in Sunnyvale.<\/p>\n<p>Tony LoBue, his sister Marie, and other groups of surviving relatives and loved ones galvanized over their opposition to Rosen and their desire to leave the death sentences undisturbed.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cIf he thinks we\u2019re stopping here, we\u2019re going to keep going,\u201d Tony LoBue said. \u201cWe\u2019re going to keep fighting him with everything we have \u2026 and we\u2019re not the only ones.\u201d<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"SAN JOSE \u2014 A Santa Clara County judge on Friday rejected a proposed settlement between prosecutors and convicted&hellip;\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":84023,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[29],"tags":[1312,47515,47516,14226,47513,47514,1331,8948,88,90,89,198],"class_list":["post-84098","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-san-jose","tag-courts","tag-death-penalty","tag-death-row","tag-district-attorneys-office","tag-erik-chatman","tag-lobue","tag-murder","tag-parole","tag-san-jose","tag-san-jose-headlines","tag-san-jose-news","tag-santa-clara-county"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/84098","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=84098"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/84098\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/84023"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=84098"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=84098"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=84098"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}