Hyperlocal journalism still matters deeply, even in today’s environment of clickbait headlines and manufactured drama, as it gives readers the context to understand how broader County and State issues affect their own community.

Take, for example, the uncertain future of the Marjory Stoneman Douglas Biscayne Nature Center (BNC), an environmental and educational landmark that, for more than 30 years, has operated under a three-way partnership among the Marjory Stoneman Douglas nonprofit, the Miami-Dade Public School District and Miami-Dade County.

Each partner has played a vital role: the County as land lessor, the School District providing classrooms and field trips for more than 20,000 students annually and the nonprofit, led by BNC Director Theodora “Theo” Long, offering naturalist-led programs for children, families, and the wider community.

Now, as a potential change in operators looms, many Key Biscayne residents and organizations who have long supported and enjoyed this “nature jewel” are left wondering what comes next.

More importantly, why?

Why did the Miami-Dade County Parks, Recreation and Open Spaces Department not reach out to the Center’s operators before deciding to terminate the lease?

Why did County leadership, including Mayor Daniella Levine Cava, decline to meet with BNC leadership before the decision was reached?

These questions may never be answered but they have created a sense of distrust in how the process has been handled to date.

This editorial aims to forge forward some possible solutions and respectfully ask the County to pause and reconsider, even as a meeting last week did not offer much hope for a resolution.

Let’s be fair: the County faced a $400 million shortfall as it finalized the new 2025-2026 fiscal year’s $12.9 billion budget. Tough decisions had to be made. Mayor Daniella Levine Cava, who, in this newspaper’s opinion and that of many residents, has generally done a good job and has shown a willingness to work with the Village of Key Biscayne on issues such as the Rickenbacker Causeway, also faced a Board of County Commission whose members often focus on their own district priorities.

But should a countywide environmental and educational treasure, one that carries the legacy of Marjory Stoneman Douglas, one of South Florida’s most revered advocates for nature, be put at risk … over $1 million?

That’s the amount the County reportedly expects to generate from BNC’s operation by altering its model to a revenue generating one.

Again, we ask, why?

Why not work with Theo Long and her Board to explore ways of increasing revenue instead of dismantling a partnership that has served the Miami-Dade County community so well?

Why risk new County-run costs that could easily erase the $1 million goal?

Why not engage Key Biscayne stakeholders, schools, residents, and local organizations, to find creative solutions?

Why not try a short-term, two-year extension to allow all sides to collaborate on new income strategies before taking irreversible action?

All these “whys” should have been considered before the County sent its certified letter, effectively an eviction notice, on September 5, advising BNC to halt all programs by November 23, 2025, and remove every exhibit, aquarium, and touch tank.

This issue is understandably emotional for those involved. Still, we hope cooler, creative heads will prevail and that a compromise can be reached before that November 23 deadline.

Why not?