{"id":149466,"date":"2026-02-10T00:04:22","date_gmt":"2026-02-10T00:04:22","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-fl\/149466\/"},"modified":"2026-02-10T00:04:22","modified_gmt":"2026-02-10T00:04:22","slug":"desantis-ai-bill-of-rights-stalls-in-house","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-fl\/149466\/","title":{"rendered":"DeSantis’ ‘AI Bill of Rights’ stalls in House"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"Gov.Gov. Ron DeSantis introducing his AI Bill of Rights proposal on Dec. 4, 2025. Credit: GovRonDeSantis \/ Facebook<\/a><\/p>\n

TALLAHASSEE\u2014Gov. Ron DeSantis ratcheted up his concerns last week about potential \u201cserious harms\u201d on humans from the growth of artificial intelligence and the need for state regulations.<\/p>\n

Yet as the Legislature approaches the scheduled midpoint of the regular session, only the Senate has moved DeSantis\u2019 desired \u201cArtificial Intelligence Bill of Rights\u201d and his call to lessen the impact of massive data centers on utility ratepayers.<\/p>\n

In the Senate, legislation seeking to create a regulatory framework that would address key issues such as electricity and water use needed to operate massive data centers (SB 484) and a corresponding effort that creates a public-records exemption that could keep information about potential large data centers confidential for up to a year (SB 1118) are one committee stop, Rules, from reaching the chamber\u2019s floor.<\/p>\n

The Senate effort involving an \u201cAI Bill of Rights,\u201d which ranges from parental controls to limits on state agency contracts with certain foreign countries (SB 482), also awaits a final hearing in the Appropriations Committee.<\/p>\n

However, the House hasn\u2019t put forward similar legislation, even though Speaker Daniel Perez in December had committee leaders consider the \u201cpotentially positive and negative impacts\u201d of artificial intelligence, ahead of the 2026 legislative session.<\/p>\n

The House version of the \u201cAI Bill of Rights\u201d (HB 1395) has been assigned to four committees, which has historically been a sign of leadership opposition to a proposal.<\/p>\n

A factor in the House delay appears to be a need to balance DeSantis\u2019 proposals with a federal push for national regulations regarding AI that put a hold on state laws.<\/p>\n

President Donald Trump wouldn\u2019t go that far when he issued a Dec. 11 directive to require the U.S. Department of Justice create an \u201cAI Litigation Council\u201d that reviews \u201conerous\u201d state laws that don\u2019t align with the White House\u2019s positions. States not in alignment could become ineligible for money intended to expand high-speed internet or face lawsuits.<\/p>\n

This has left lawmakers having to balance the desires of the two Republican leaders.<\/p>\n

In December, Perez, a Miami Republican who has clashed with DeSantis on numerous issues over the past year, said he disagreed with DeSantis\u2019 approach that seemed to be at odds with the president.<\/p>\n

\u201cI think technology as a whole, especially national technology policy, is not something that states should be getting involved in on a state level,\u201d Perez told the News Service of Florida.<\/p>\n

\u201cAm I open to having the conversation on AI, the good, the bad, and the ugly? Of course, but the way that the president opined on AI and on technology as a whole, he was coming at it from the perspective of national security and an executive order that has to deal with, of course, technology, but more importantly, with the national security of this country,\u201d Perez continued. <\/p>\n

\u201cI don\u2019t believe that we should be negating the president\u2019s opinion or diminishing its value. I think it\u2019s something that we should absolutely take into consideration. And the House stands with the president in acknowledging that technology is a national security issue and has to be discussed in deep, deep thought, but can\u2019t just be negated off the top.\u201d<\/p>\n

On Wednesday, DeSantis held a roundtable on artificial intelligence at New College of Florida in Sarasota where he stressed that the state has a responsibility to channel technology to benefit people and enhance, rather than supplant, the human experience.<\/p>\n

\u201cIt\u2019s being proposed and purported to be not just something that could kind of take us to the next level,\u201d DeSantis said. \u201cThere are some people who are big advocates of that, who almost relish in the fact that they think this just displaces human beings and then ultimately you\u2019re going to have AI run society and that you\u2019re not going to be able to control it. Count me out on that.\u201d<\/p>\n

Among his concerns are the use of chatbots to sexually groom teens and the impact of mass data centers, which he maintains will result in higher costs for electricity, increased demand on the regional water supply, and produce few new jobs.<\/p>\n

\u201cIf you\u2019re increasing demand exponentially, you are going to have individuals pay more. The cost is going to be higher,\u201d DeSantis said. \u201cAnd I don\u2019t think there\u2019s very many people that want to have higher energy bills just so a chatbot can try to corrupt some 13-year-old kid online.\u201d<\/p>\n

The proposal seeking an \u201cAI Bill of Rights\u201d by Sen. Tom Leek, R-Ormond Beach, seeks to establish a right for parents to control children\u2019s interactions with artificial intelligence; that people have a right to know when they\u2019re communicating with a human or an AI system or chatbot; and sets rules about the unauthorized use of people\u2019s names, images or likenesses.<\/p>\n

The measure also says people have a right to know whether political advertisements were created in whole or in part with the use of artificial intelligence and would prohibit Florida government agencies from contracting with AI firms tied to what is known as a \u201cforeign country of concern,\u201d such as China or Russia.<\/p>\n

Tom Mann, state policy manager for the Computer & Communications Industry Association, a national tech industry group, advised the Senate last month that Leek\u2019s bill \u201cwould create a standalone state framework that increases compliance burdens without delivering clear safety benefits.\u201d<\/p>\n

\u201cFragmented state laws make it challenging for a company to deploy more features and services in a particular state and risk undermining online free expression,\u201d Mann said in a news release.<\/p>\n

The data center bill, in part, would require the Florida Public Service Commission, which regulates electric utilities, to develop what are known as \u201ctariffs\u201d and service requirements to \u201creasonably ensure that each large load customer bears its own full cost of service and that such cost is not shifted to the general body of ratepayers.\u201d That would include costs related to issues such as connecting to electric systems and increased power transmission and generation costs.<\/p>\n

Pitch in to help make the Tampa Bay Journalism Project a success.<\/a><\/p>\n

Subscribe to Creative Loafing newsletters.<\/a><\/p>\n

Follow us:\u00a0Google News<\/a>\u00a0|\u00a0NewsBreak<\/a>\u00a0|\u00a0Reddit<\/a>\u00a0|\u00a0Instagram<\/a>\u00a0|\u00a0Facebook\u00a0<\/a>|\u00a0BlueSky<\/a><\/p>\n

Recent Stories<\/p>\n

\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\"Why\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/a><\/p>\n

\n\t\t\t\t\tThe Tampa and Miami areas split most of Florida\u2019s data centers.\t\t\t\t<\/p>\n

\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\"In\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/a><\/p>\n

\n\t\t\t\t\tSouthern Poverty Law Center recently found that overcrowding and understaffing at a nearby prison led to complaints of excessive force and staff misconduct.\t\t\t\t<\/p>\n

\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\"DeSantis\u2019\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/a><\/p>\n

\n\t\t\t\t\tThe bill\u2019s House version has been assigned to four committees\u2014a historic sign of leadership opposition.\t\t\t\t<\/p>\n

This article appears in Feb. 05 \u2013 11, 2026<\/a>.<\/p>\n

\n\tRelated\n<\/p>\n

\t