![\"Aerial](\"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-fl\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/city-of-Tampa-aerial-Gianfranco-Vivi-shutterstock_2477922495.jpg\")
Tampa, Florida Credit: Gianfranco Vivi \/ Shutterstock<\/p>\nTampa, Florida Credit: Gianfranco Vivi \/ Shutterstock<\/p>\n
Long time readers of Tampa Monitor will know that one of the single biggest issues raised here has been the failure of city council to grasp the budget process. To fully understand what they are approving. One of the biggest misconceptions has been what approving the 5 year Capital Improvement Program (CIP) and the projects in the fiscal year they are voting on. At various times over the last 8 years individual council members have expressed that the budget and CIP are aspirational. Conceptual projects. That there would be some future \u201creal\u201d vote to approve the project before it would proceed. \u201cMore bites at the apple.\u201d<\/p>\n
What they\u2019ve learned is that the \u201creal\u201d future vote isn\u2019t a vote whether or not to pursue the project but a vote to approve a contract to start. Start design. Buy the land. Often times 6\u20139 months after the CIP approval. And it might be a small contract, seem benign. Exploratory. So it\u2019s approved because \u201cthere\u2019s another bite at the apple.\u201d<\/p>\n
Then a year or more later a multimillion dollar contract lands on their agenda and people throws up their arms yelling \u201cwhen was this approved?\u201d \u201cWhy are we just learning about it now?\u201d And then accusations get thrown around and the debate devolves into personal attacks. A contract amount that\u2019s the same amount approved in a prior year\u2019s CIP budget by the same council.<\/p>\n
During Thursday\u2019s workshop it was made abundantly clear by staff that approving the CIP green lights the first steps of the project. Yes, there will be a vote on a preliminary step, and council should evaluate any vote to make sure it\u2019s within budget and meets their expectations for the project\u00a0when they approved it in the budget.\u00a0Same for a final build with a Guaranteed Maximum Price (GMP). If the contract comes back within budget and satisfies the goals of the project, it shouldn\u2019t be controversial. Over budget or missing scope? Sure, valid issues to raise and grounds to vote against a project.<\/p>\n
Freshly armed with that timely knowledge, Tampa City Council will be holding in what Tampa City Council Attorney Martin Shelby\u2019s believes is a first of its kind, special call workshop Tuesday evening from 5pm to 8pm to discuss the Fiscal Year (FY) 27 budget. An open discussion to allow them as a body to give direction to their budget analyst, to start talking about priorities as well to consider how they want to use their time between when the mayor presents her budget and when it needs to be adopted.<\/p>\n
The previous two years, Mayor Jane Castor has presented her budget proposal mid-July when council returns from their summer break. The charter only requires a budget proposal to be presented 45 days prior to the end of the fiscal year on Sept. 30, 2026. If a budget isn\u2019t approved before Oct. 1, the Charter does provide for the mayor and council to operate under current funding levels for operations until an agreement is reached. Either four council members along with the mayor or five council members are required for budget adoption.<\/p>\n
Historically council holds two workshops prior to the two public adoption hearings during the time. Last year council unanimously approved Council member Lynn Hurtak\u2019s motion to hold a third workshop specifically to discuss stormwater. Next week\u2019s budget workshop was also proposed by Council member Hurtak and unanimously approved.<\/p>\n
Who ever the next mayor and council are, they will be inheriting this budget.<\/p>\n
Have the debates about the merits of what capital improvement projects are included before approving the budget. If there are projects or funding proposals you find egregious, don\u2019t vote for it. If enough members find issue \u2014 they don\u2019t have to be the same concerns \u2014 there\u2019s not 4 or 5 votes. Real debates will be had. Changes will need to be made, amendments introduced and hard votes taken. Set priorities with clarity and transparency so that residents can hold their next elected officials to the same expectations.<\/p>\n
That\u2019s a legacy to leave.<\/p>\n
This post first appeared on The Tampa Monitor and is used under the Creative Commons license CC BY-NC-ND 4.<\/p>\n
If you are a non-paywalled Bay area publication interested in TBJP, please email rroa@ctampa.com<\/a>. Support The Tampa Monitor<\/a> by making a donation or buying Michael Bishop a coffee.<\/p>\n Pitch in to help make the Tampa Bay Journalism Project a success.<\/a><\/p>\n Subscribe to Creative Loafing newsletters.<\/a><\/p>\n Follow us:\u00a0Google News<\/a>\u00a0|\u00a0NewsBreak<\/a>\u00a0|\u00a0Reddit<\/a>\u00a0|\u00a0Instagram<\/a>\u00a0|\u00a0Facebook\u00a0<\/a>|\u00a0BlueSky<\/a><\/p>\n This article appears in Feb. 26 \u2013 Mar. 04, 2026<\/a>.<\/p>\n \n\tRelated\n<\/p>\n \t