{"id":175539,"date":"2026-03-02T22:03:06","date_gmt":"2026-03-02T22:03:06","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-fl\/175539\/"},"modified":"2026-03-02T22:03:06","modified_gmt":"2026-03-02T22:03:06","slug":"court-rejects-trump-admin-bid-to-slow-tariff-refund-process","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-fl\/175539\/","title":{"rendered":"Court rejects Trump admin bid to slow tariff refund process"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>WASHINGTON \u2014 A federal court on Monday rejected the Trump administration&#8217;s attempt to slow the process of refunding billions of dollars&#8217; worth of tariffs the Supreme Court struck down as illegal last month.<\/p>\n<p>What You Need To Know<\/p>\n<p>A federal court on Monday rejected the Trump administration&#8217;s attempt to slow the process of refunding billions of dollars&#8217; worth of tariffs the Supreme Court struck down as illegal last month<br \/>\n<br \/>The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit started the next phase in the refund process by sending it to a lower court to sort out<br \/>\n<br \/>In a court filing Friday, Trump&#8217;s Justice Department had urged the Federal Circuit to proceed cautiously and hold off for 90 days,\u00a0but the judges refused<\/p>\n<p>The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit started the next phase in the refund process by sending it to a lower court to sort out.<\/p>\n<p>In a court filing Friday, Trump&#8217;s Justice Department had urged the Federal Circuit to proceed cautiously and hold off for 90 days. But the judges refused.<\/p>\n<p>The Supreme Court ruled Feb. 20 that Trump&#8217;s sweeping tariffs on most countries in the world were illegal, clearing the way for the importers who paid them to seek refunds.<\/p>\n<p>The government had collected more than $130 billion from the tariffs by mid-December, and could ultimately be on the hook for refunds worth $175 billion, according to calculations by the Penn Wharton Budget Model.<\/p>\n<p>But the Supreme Court offered no guidance on refunds; its decision did not even mention them. Now the U.S. Court of International Trade in New York will decide how the complicated refund process should proceed.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;I would expect the Court of International Trade to quickly issue an order requesting a status update from the government on their plans with respect to refunds (or expedited briefing),&#8221; said trade lawyer Ryan Majerus, a partner at King &amp; Spalding and a former U.S. trade official. &#8220;I expect the court to take an aggressive posture, asking the government to justify how they intend to comply with the Supreme Court&#8217;s ruling.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Siddartha Rao, a partner at law firm Hoguet Newman Regal &amp; Kenney, said he has been getting a lot of calls from clients with questions.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;We are somewhat in uncharted territory,&#8221; he said.<\/p>\n<p>The Trump administration has been reaching for new tariffs to replace the ones the Supreme Court struck down.<\/p>\n<p>One question, he said, is how the government might actually pay for these refunds.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Everyone is sort of cognizant of the fact that it&#8217;s not like there&#8217;s over a hundred billion dollars sitting in, you know, in a room somewhere to just cut checks,&#8221; Rao said. &#8220;So, you know, this is a Treasury problem, and it may very well be that the administration is reimposing tariffs for the reasons that it&#8217;s cited &#8230; it&#8217;s important for strategic trade agreements and for bargaining power and all of that. But it also might be that they need to raise revenue to pay out refunds.&#8221;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"WASHINGTON \u2014 A federal court on Monday rejected the Trump administration&#8217;s attempt to slow the process of refunding&hellip;\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":175540,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[17],"tags":[12109,12111,26796,274,2205,249,251,250,115,12110,99,278],"class_list":{"0":"post-175539","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-fort-lauderdale","8":"tag-all-markets-rank-everywhere","9":"tag-app-for-your-consideration","10":"tag-app-national-politics","11":"tag-app-top-stories","12":"tag-associated-press","13":"tag-fort-lauderdale","14":"tag-fort-lauderdale-headlines","15":"tag-fort-lauderdale-news","16":"tag-news","17":"tag-nnt","18":"tag-politics","19":"tag-top-stories"},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-fl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/175539","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-fl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-fl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-fl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-fl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=175539"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-fl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/175539\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-fl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/175540"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-fl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=175539"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-fl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=175539"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-fl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=175539"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}