![\"\"](\"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-fl\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/Hoffman_cvr-200x300.jpg\")
<\/p>\nBelow is an excerpt from the new book, Making the Miami Cubanita: A Pop Cultural Genealogy, available to purchase by clicking here.\u00a0<\/p>\n
Laura: You can\u2019t take Miami and put it inside a little box. It\u2019s within you. You can\u2019t put a yellow cardigan on and say, \u201cOh, Miami, I am going to cover you up with my little yellow caca cardigan.\u201d It can\u2019t happen that way.<\/p>\n
Jenny: Okay. Well, let\u2019s take the tetas out.<\/p>\n
\u2014 Laura Di Lorenzo and Jenny Lorenzo on Pero Like Presents: \u201cWomen Transform into Chongas\u201d<\/p>\n
What follows is the story of a group of young women who empowered themselves by exaggerating ownership of an ethno-racial identity they were explicitly forbidden to assume. Amid communal efforts to scramble back to the white side of the color line, llegaron las chongas (the chongas arrived), but they were gyrating in the opposite direction. Nobody knows exactly when the term \u201cchonga\u201d was first hurled as an insult, but at some point in the late 1980s a gaggle of Miami cubanitas redefined cubanidad on their own terms. Growing ubiquitous in South Florida in subsequent decades, their signature aesthetic provoked ridicule and enmity in the Cuban exile community, which coined the term \u201cchonga\u201d to describe these wayward daughters. This was not typical intergenerational conflict; older and established Cuban exiles were waging a battle for the hard-won ethnic capital that had once propelled them to the top of immigrant prestige. The sparkle was wearing off the Golden Exiles, and every flick of a chonga\u2019s thick black eyeliner stained the community\u2019s white skin brown. The insult was a call for hegemony, a protection of privilege, and a battle for whiteness. Miami Cubans had come too far to let these little ni\u00f1as ruin their model-minority status with lip liner.<\/p>\n
Elsewhere, I argue that chongaism was born at a time of deteriorating racial privilege and was a way to assert and define an identity that was increasingly contested. By the late 1980s, abiding by middle-class norms of white respectability was no longer the protective or viable measure it had once been for Miami\u2019s Cuban community. In defiance of an unobtainable standard, many young women embraced the pan- Latin classification that their parents had long resisted, adopting sartorial signifiers of a tough sexuality that proudly advertised their otherness. To Cubans driving around with \u201cYo no soy hispano . . . yo soy cubano\u201d (I\u2019m not Hispanic . . . I\u2019m Cuban) bumper stickers, watching these young cubanas don expressions of brownness was una barbaridad (a barbarity) because it jeopardized the ethnic capital their parents and grandparents had carefully cultivated.<\/p>\n
Although the practice of regulating the behavior and appearance of young women is not exclusive to any one community, I contend that this particular struggle (of the chongas) in this particular community (Cuban Miami) at this particular time (the late 1980s and early 1990s) and in this particular space (South Florida) differed from typical intergenerational conflict because of the particular sociopolitical import carried by the image and reputation of young cubanas at the time\u2026<\/p>\n
In the 1980s and early 1990s, the city was under a microscope. Across disciplines, scholars and cultural critics published books investigating Miami. While their perspectives differed, they agreed on one inescapable principle: Miami at this time was like no other place on Earth, and part of what made it so was a frightening acceptance of exile-on-exile domestic terrorism. The following examples of contemporary works about Miami establish the lengths the exile community underwent to punish anybody not in line with a narrowly defined understanding of cubanidad. Some of the works cited below claimed that a de-escalation of terrorism occurred by the early 1990s, but in both 1992 and 1994, Human Rights Watch issued separate reports strongly condemning the city for violence and intimidation against those exiles who were not in line with the community\u2019s right-wing ideology.<\/p>\n
In 1987 celebrated author Joan Didion published Miami, a social and political analysis in which she marveled at the impact Cuban exiles had had on the city. As a well- traveled white woman, she noted that Miami was hardly the only American city with a sizable Spanish-speaking population. But unlike cities such as Houston and Los Angeles, where Spanish was \u201cambient noise\u201d spoken by underclass service people such as waiters and car washers, in Miami, Spanish was spoken by the movers and the shakers, the people who ate at restaurants and drove expensive cars and adorned their fancy houses with expensive landscaping. Arguing Miami Cubans operated in a parallel culture to the once-dominant Anglo structure, she warned of a dangerous underside to the Golden Exiles. Much of Didion\u2019s work focused on the prevalence and social acceptance of exilic political violence.<\/p>\n
In 1993 sociologists Alejandro Portes and Alex Stepick illuminated the exile community\u2019s response to its drastic change in reputation after the 1980 Mariel boatlift in City on the Edge: The Transformation of Miami. They argued that first-wave Cubans turned their attention inward and silenced detractors, ramping up efforts to present a monolithic and positive image. Journalist David Rieff\u2019s 1993 The Exile: Cuba in the Heart of Miami and historian Mar\u00eda Cristina Garc\u00eda\u2019s 1996 Havana USA: Cuban Exiles and Cuban Americans in South Florida, 1959\u2013 1994 also focused on terrorism. Rieff and Garc\u00eda addressed the Miami Cuban community\u2019s anxiety over the Americanization of the next generation more than did the aforementioned authors, but they still did not draw attention to chongaism, the burgeoning subculture I explore in part 2 of this book.<\/p>\n
These authors writing in the late 1980s and early 1990s omitted important voices, which were discounted and overlooked because they belonged to those preteen and adolescent girls who were quickly earning their community\u2019s scorn\u2014 the chongas. Originally used to stigmatize cubanitas challenging their community\u2019s white-centered acculturation, staid gender norms, and stifling behavioral mandates, the label has now blossomed into something much bigger. It is important to recognize that the impulse behind intra-exile political violence and this derogatory label of \u201cchonga\u201d were not unrelated. Both were based on an us-against-them mentality and were intended to punish those exiles who refused to conform to a narrow understanding of Cuban American identity. Exiles attempted to create a unified vertical community by punishing political dissidents, and in the late 1980s and early 1990s, suspected communists were not the only victims of their aggressive repudiations of difference. Nobody was ever bombed or killed for being too \u201cchongalicious,\u201d but the bravery of young women performing non-whiteness at a time when their volatile community was desperately trying to reanimate their once-pristine and whitewashed reputation amid drastic status reversal should not be discounted.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Liked it? Take a second to support The Jitney on Patreon! The Jitney needs gas. Please donate or become a Patron here<\/p>\n
![\"Become](\"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-fl\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/become_a_patron_button.png\")
<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Below is an excerpt from the new book, Making the Miami Cubanita: A Pop Cultural Genealogy, available to…\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":208225,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[9],"tags":[123,125,124],"class_list":["post-208224","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-miami","tag-miami","tag-miami-headlines","tag-miami-news"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-fl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/208224","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-fl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-fl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-fl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-fl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=208224"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-fl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/208224\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-fl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/208225"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-fl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=208224"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-fl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=208224"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-fl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=208224"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}