{"id":224962,"date":"2026-04-09T15:21:20","date_gmt":"2026-04-09T15:21:20","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-fl\/224962\/"},"modified":"2026-04-09T15:21:20","modified_gmt":"2026-04-09T15:21:20","slug":"miamis-tree-permitting-overhaul-returns-as-quiet-changes-take-root","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-fl\/224962\/","title":{"rendered":"Miami&#8217;s tree permitting overhaul returns as quiet changes take root"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Miami\u2019s effort to rewrite its tree protection laws is springing back to life, with a proposed overhaul expected to reach the City Commission later this year \u2014 but parts of it may already be in place.<\/p>\n<p>Internal records reviewed by the Spotlight show that in early 2024 \u2014 as city officials were drafting a controversial set of proposed changes to Miami\u2019s tree ordinance \u2014 they were also revising internal permitting policies governing tree removal. Some of those policy changes, officials say, are only now being implemented.<\/p>\n<p>Among the recent changes: no site visits by reviewing officers before issuing tree removal permits, a move critics say could harm the tree canopy by allowing false or misleading applications to go unchecked. Instead, documents show, permitting decisions will rely more heavily on information submitted by arborists, other licensed professionals and, in some cases, property owners themselves.<\/p>\n<p>Meanwhile, the city\u2019s longtime chief overseeing tree permitting and enforcement was abruptly reassigned last month to another department, a move city officials have not publicly explained amid the ongoing overhaul of tree permitting practices.<\/p>\n<p>The legislative push to rewrite Miami\u2019s tree laws surfaced publicly in October 2024, when District 1 Commissioner Miguel Gabela introduced a proposal that would have reduced permitting requirements, loosened oversight of tree removals and altered how mitigation funds \u2014 the fees property owners pay when trees make way for development \u2014 are used.<\/p>\n<p>    <img decoding=\"async\" class=\"Image\" alt=\"View of the dense tree canopy along Palermo Avenue in Coral Gables. In Miami, a controversial tree ordinance, if passed, would change the way the city handles permitting for tree removal as well as trimming on private and public property.\"  width=\"880\" height=\"495\" loading=\"lazy\" src=\"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-fl\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/1775748080_553_.jpeg\"\/><\/p>\n<p>Pedro Portal<\/p>\n<p>\/<\/p>\n<p> Miami Herald<\/p>\n<p>View of the dense tree canopy along Palermo Avenue in Coral Gables. In Miami, a controversial tree ordinance, if passed, would change the way the city handles permitting for tree removal as well as trimming on private and public property.<\/p>\n<p>The item drew immediate backlash from environmental groups and neighborhood advocates, who objected not only to the substance of the proposed changes but also to the lack of public notice ahead of a binding commission vote. The commission ultimately deferred the proposal.<\/p>\n<p>But the changes were anything but sudden. Emails obtained through a public records request and reviewed by the Spotlight show that officials in the Building Department \u2014 which has authority over tree permitting for the city \u2014 had, by early 2024, begun laying out plansto significantly alter the regulatory scope of the city\u2019s tree protection laws by amending the city code.<\/p>\n<p>At the same time, internal documents show, those same officials were advancing internal policy changes designed to \u201cstreamline the overall permitting process\u201d by eliminating \u201credundant work efforts and bottlenecks\u201d \u2014 changes that could reshape how the code is applied even without legislative action.<\/p>\n<p>READ MORE: <a href=\"https:\/\/www.wlrn.org\/government-politics\/2025-04-25\/miami-tree-ordinance-manolo-reyes-park\" class=\"Link\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">City of Miami drops controversial tree ordinance law, honors late Manolo Reyes with a park<\/a><\/p>\n<p>Only now, city officials say, are those changes beginning to take hold.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cWe\u2019ve had some minor changes in procedures,\u201d Building Department Director Ed Santamaria said in an interview with the Spotlight. \u201cWhere the code is open to some interpretation, we\u2019re looking to interpret in a way that doesn\u2019t slow down things and just speeds up processes. We\u2019re looking to be more responsive.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Santamaria says the effort aligns with a broader directive from new Mayor Eileen Higgins and City Manager James Reyes to adopt a more user-friendly permitting ecosystem at city hall.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThe new administration has taken up this banner of improving the permitting process,\u201d he said. \u201cAnd we are here to deliver around the mission as much as possible.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Santamaria said reviewers are being instructed to rely on the accuracy of permit applications \u2014 including the size, number, species, location and condition of trees proposed for removal \u2014 while acknowledging the process depends largely on the competence and integrity of applicants and their arborists.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThere are bad actors,\u201d he acknowledged, noting that some applicants may attempt to misrepresent conditions in order to secure approvals.<\/p>\n<p>While Santamaria is quick to insist that Chapter 17 of the city code \u2013 the tree protection and permitting ordinance \u2014 remains intact, the internal guidelines outlined in the Building Department\u2019s updated manual of policies and procedures reflects a clear departure from a review process historically grounded in on-site inspection and staff discretion, toward a faster, applicant-driven system built around documentation and standardized workflows.<\/p>\n<p>Santamaria said he has seen an uptick in tree removal permits in recent months, which he cited as evidence of the success of the new approach.<\/p>\n<p>The internal changes are unfolding alongside a leadership shakeup within the Building Department division responsible for enforcing the city\u2019s tree protections. Quatisha Oguntoyinbo-Rashad, a 26-year City Hall veteran who spent the last 14 years leading the 10-member Environmental Resources Division, has been reassigned to the Department of Resilience and Public Works, where she no longer has a role in tree permitting or enforcement.<\/p>\n<p>City officials refused repeated requests to make Oguntoyinbo-Rashad available for an interview. (Under city policy, employees are forbidden from speaking with the media without prior authorization).<\/p>\n<p>Oguntoyinbo-Rashad raised eyebrows during the public outcry over the proposed changes to the tree laws in late 2024 when she told civic leaders that neither she nor her staff had been asked to weigh in on the legislative overhaul \u2014 even though her division is charged with implementing and enforcing the laws.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cNeither I nor the Environmental Resources Division has been involved in the proposed changes to this ordinance,\u201d she wrote to community stakeholders in a widely circulated email.<\/p>\n<p>Performance reviews obtained by the Spotlight through a public records request show glowing evaluations throughout her long tenure with the city, followed by a sudden red flag in 2024, when she received a \u201cneeds improvement\u201d in the \u201cJudgment\u201d category, with a Building Department official recommending that she \u201cshow more willingness to accept and implement directions from supervisors.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Her 2025 performance review, completed in December, has been withheld from the Spotlight without explanation, despite repeated requests and despite state law requiring that any documents exemption be justified.<\/p>\n<p>Oguntoyinbo-Rashad\u2019s reassignment comes as the effort to revisit the city\u2019s tree ordinance gains momentum \u2014 this time with broader public input and, city officials hope, buy-in from residents.<\/p>\n<p>Last summer, after yet another false start at revising the tree ordinance, city commissioners instructed staff to engage Florida State University\u2019s Florida Conflict Resolution Center under a $180,000 contract to help find common ground among civic groups pushing for stricter tree removal and enforcement laws and development interests who see them as overly burdensome.<\/p>\n<p>While off to a slow start, Assistant Building Director Melissa Fernandez-Stiers said in an interview that the center is now conducting outreach to a broad cross-section of community stakeholders \u2014 residents, civic groups and developers. Later this year, the center will conduct at least one and perhaps two community workshops within each of the city\u2019s five commission district to engage the public.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThis has been an ongoing effort,\u201d Fernandez-Stiers said. \u201cWe want to make sure we\u2019re hearing from all sides before anything is put forward.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>The center\u2019s principals did not respond to a request for comment.<\/p>\n<p>Also off to a slow start is the creation of a resident advisory group that will work in tandem with the Conflict Resolution Center. Fernandez-Stiers said the exact makeup of the group, which will include two nominations from each commissioner, has yet to be finalized.<\/p>\n<p>(District 2 Commissioner Damian Pardo has not responded to the Spotlight\u2019s request to say who, if anyone, he has nominated, but North Grove arborist Ian Wogan said he has been asked to serve.)<\/p>\n<p>At the earliest, Fernandez-Stiers said, a draft ordinance \u2014 which, like its 2024 predecessor, will be overseen by officials in the city\u2019s Building Department \u2014 is not expected before December. \u201cAnd even that,\u201d she cautioned, \u201cis a best-case scenario if everything goes according to plan.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>This story was originally published in the <a href=\"https:\/\/coconutgrovespotlight.com\/\" class=\"Link\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\">Coconut Grove Spotlight<\/a>, a WLRN News partner.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Miami\u2019s effort to rewrite its tree protection laws is springing back to life, with a proposed overhaul expected&hellip;\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":224963,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[9],"tags":[123,125,124],"class_list":["post-224962","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-miami","tag-miami","tag-miami-headlines","tag-miami-news"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-fl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/224962","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-fl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-fl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-fl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-fl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=224962"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-fl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/224962\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-fl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/224963"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-fl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=224962"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-fl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=224962"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-fl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=224962"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}