{"id":231341,"date":"2026-04-14T15:08:07","date_gmt":"2026-04-14T15:08:07","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-fl\/231341\/"},"modified":"2026-04-14T15:08:07","modified_gmt":"2026-04-14T15:08:07","slug":"research-development-review-paper-co-authored-by-rdis-karen-walker-defines-competitive-intelligence-for-higher-education","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-fl\/231341\/","title":{"rendered":"Research Development Review paper, co-authored by RDI\u2019s Karen Walker, defines competitive intelligence for higher education"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>\u00a0by Ann Comer-Woods, USF Research<\/p>\n<p>A new scholarly paper co-authored by Karen Walker, competitive intelligence associate<br \/>\n                  director at the University of South Florida\u2019s <a href=\"https:\/\/www.usf.edu\/research-innovation\/rdi\/\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Research Development Institute<\/a>, and Alba Clivati McIntyre, policy and planning analyst for the University of Wisconsin\u2019s<br \/>\n                  <a href=\"https:\/\/crisp.wisc.edu\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Collective for Research Impact and Social Partnerships<\/a>, is helping shape how universities nationwide think about strategy, funding and research<br \/>\n                  growth.<\/p>\n<p>Published in the National Organization of Research Development Professionals\u2019 inaugural<br \/>\n                  issue of Research Development Review, the paper titled \u201c<a href=\"https:\/\/scholarscompass.vcu.edu\/cgi\/viewcontent.cgi?article=1009&amp;context=rdr_nordp\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Defining Competitive Intelligence for Research Development<\/a>,\u201d offers the first comprehensive, higher-education-focused definition of competitive<br \/>\n                  intelligence and explains how it is increasingly essential to success in academic<br \/>\n                  research development.<\/p>\n<p>Competitive intelligence refers to the ethical collection, analysis and interpretation<br \/>\n                  of information to provide actionable insights that guide strategic decision-making.<br \/>\n                  In the university research context, Walker and McIntyre assert that competitive intelligence<br \/>\n                  allows institutions to move from reacting to funding announcements to positioning<br \/>\n                  themselves proactively in a highly competitive research ecosystem. \u201cUniversities are<br \/>\n                  operating in an environment of rapid change\u2014shifting federal priorities, growing competition<br \/>\n                  for grants, and expanding opportunities for interdisciplinary and industry partnerships,\u201d<br \/>\n                  the paper notes. \u201cCompetitive intelligence provides the structure needed to navigate<br \/>\n                  that complexity with clarity and purpose.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>While competitive intelligence has long been embedded in industry and government,<br \/>\n                  the practice is relatively new but quickly growing within higher education. The Competitive<br \/>\n                  Intelligence Working Group, founded by Walker as a national community of practice<br \/>\n                  for university CI professionals, has expanded from about 20 members in 2017 to nearly<br \/>\n                  120 in 2025. Several universities, including USF, now employ dedicated CI professionals<br \/>\n                  to support research leadership and faculty.<\/p>\n<p>A central contribution of the paper is its explanation of how intelligence differs<br \/>\n                  from raw data or basic information. Drawing on frameworks from military intelligence<br \/>\n                  and corporate strategy, Walker and McIntyre outline a knowledge continuum: data becomes<br \/>\n                  information, and information becomes intelligence only through expert analysis and<br \/>\n                  context.<\/p>\n<p>For example, knowing how many grants a funding program has awarded is data. Identifying<br \/>\n                  patterns among awardees is information. Using that knowledge to recommend potential<br \/>\n                  collaborators or proposal strategies tailored to a specific researcher is intelligence.<br \/>\n                  This transformation, the authors contend, requires skilled analysts who can synthesize<br \/>\n                  multiple data sources, anticipate trends and align insights with institutional goals.<\/p>\n<p>               Three Core Domains of Competitive Intelligence<\/p>\n<p>The paper identifies three core areas where competitive intelligence delivers the<br \/>\n                  greatest value to university research offices:<\/p>\n<p>                  Sponsor Intelligence and Funding Strategy: Analyzing funding agencies\u2019 priorities,<br \/>\n                     award trends and policy shifts to help faculty tailor more competitive proposals and<br \/>\n                     anticipate emerging opportunities.<\/p>\n<p>                  Institutional Capacity Assessment: Mapping a university\u2019s internal research strengths,<br \/>\n                     facilities and expertise to inform strategic investments and leadership decisions.<\/p>\n<p>                  Competitor and Partnership Analysis: Benchmarking peer institutions, identifying potential<br \/>\n                     collaborators and understanding where competition may be strongest or collaboration<br \/>\n                     most advantageous.<\/p>\n<p>At USF, these approaches support efforts to align research strengths with funder interests,<br \/>\n                  diversify funding portfolios and build partnerships that amplify impact.<\/p>\n<p>               Practical Impact through a Case Study<\/p>\n<p>To illustrate CI in action, the paper presents a detailed case study in which analysts<br \/>\n                  assessed whether a university had the research capacity to compete for state funding<br \/>\n                  to establish an institute focused on opioid and substance abuse research. Using grant<br \/>\n                  data, publication analysis and collaboration network mapping, the analysts identified<br \/>\n                  more than 200 affiliated researchers and multiple interdisciplinary clusters working<br \/>\n                  in the field. The analysis concluded that the university was well positioned to pursue<br \/>\n                  the opportunity, providing leadership with the confidence to move forward.<\/p>\n<p>Beyond individual proposals, the authors emphasize that competitive intelligence strengthens<br \/>\n                  long-term institutional resilience. By monitoring shifts in funding landscapes and<br \/>\n                  competitor activity, universities can mitigate risk, avoid misaligned investments<br \/>\n                  and respond more nimbly to change.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cCI helps leaders understand not only where the university stands today, but where<br \/>\n                  it could be tomorrow\u2014and what it will take to get there,\u201d the authors write. They<br \/>\n                  also note that CI is a collaborative enterprise, relying on partnerships with units<br \/>\n                  such as government relations, advancement, information technology and academic leadership.<\/p>\n<p>The paper concludes by calling for broader recognition of competitive intelligence<br \/>\n                  as a core function within research development. Future work, the authors suggest,<br \/>\n                  should focus on practical tools, emerging technologies such as artificial intelligence<br \/>\n                  and professional development pathways for CI analysts, while emphasizing that human<br \/>\n                  judgment and contextual expertise remain irreplaceable.<\/p>\n<p>For USF, the work reflects the Research Development Institute\u2019s commitment to advancing<br \/>\n                  not only proposal success, but the strategic capacity of the university. As competition<br \/>\n                  for research funding intensifies nationwide, the authors argue, competitive intelligence<br \/>\n                  may prove to be one of the most important drivers of academic innovation and success.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"\u00a0by Ann Comer-Woods, USF Research A new scholarly paper co-authored by Karen Walker, competitive intelligence associate director at&hellip;\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":231342,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[10],"tags":[135,137,136],"class_list":["post-231341","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-tampa","tag-tampa","tag-tampa-headlines","tag-tampa-news"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-fl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/231341","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-fl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-fl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-fl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-fl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=231341"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-fl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/231341\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-fl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/231342"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-fl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=231341"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-fl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=231341"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-fl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=231341"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}